(www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/bdm.575 The Transience of Constructed Preferences

A large body of research suggests that preferences are constructed rather than merely accessed in the course of making decisions. The current research examines the stability of constructed preferences over time. Preferences for various factors relevant to a job choice were measured prior to presentation of the job choice task, at the point of decision, and again following a delay. It was found that relative to baseline pre-decision levels, preferences shifted to provide stronger support for the emerging decision. Preference changes proved to be transient, receding to baseline after one week (Ex. 1), and even within fifteen minutes (Ex. 2). These findings, which can be interpreted in terms of decision making by constraint satisfaction, suggest that preferences are constructed to serve the decision at hand, without constraining the decision maker in future decisions.

[1]  O. Svenson.  Decision Making and the Search for Fundamental Psychological Regularities: What Can Be Learned from a Process Perspective? , 1996 .

[2]  Authors' Biographies , 2005 .

[3]  D. Ariely,et al.  “Coherent Arbitrariness”: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences , 2003 .

[4]  D. Simon.  A Third View of the Black Box: Cognitive Coherence in Legal Decision Making , 2004 .

[5]  S. Read,et al.  The redux of cognitive consistency theories: evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  P. Juslin,et al.  Judgment and decision making: Neo-Brunswikian and process tracing approaches , 1999 .

[7]  A. Brownstein,et al.  Biased predecision processing. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  J. Payne,et al.  Measuring Constructed Preferences: Towards a Building Code , 1999 .

[9]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach , 1993 .

[10]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Book Reviews : Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improv ing Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998, 136 pages, $26.00 , 1998 .

[11]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  The Distortion of Information during Decisions , 1996 .

[12]  Deborah Monique,et al.  Authors' addresses , 2004 .

[13]  O. Svenson.  Differentiation and consolidation theory of human decision making: A frame of reference for the study of pre- and post-decision processes , 1992 .

[14]  E. O’neal,et al.  Anticipated choice, attention, and halo effect , 1971 .

[15]  W. Edwards,et al.  MULTIATTRIBUTE EVALUATION , 2003 .

[16]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  A Coherence Model of Cognitive Consistency: Dynamics of Attitude Change During the Persian Gulf War , 1993 .

[17]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction , 1999 .

[18]  P. Thagard,et al.  Explanatory coherence , 1993 .

[19]  S. Read,et al.  Connectionism, Parallel Constraint Satisfaction Processes, and Gestalt Principles: (Re)Introducing Cognitive Dynamics to Social Psychology , 1997, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[20]  Daniel G Goldstein,et al.  Making better decisions: from measuring to constructing preferences. , 2005, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[21]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Construction of Preference: References , 2006 .

[22]  Kelly G. Shaver,et al.  Handbook of Basic Principles in Social Psychology (Book) , 1997 .

[23]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Decision Rules and the Search for a Dominance Structure: Towards a Process Model of Decision Making* , 1983 .

[24]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The emergence of coherence over the course of decision making. , 2001 .

[25]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .

[26]  Daniel Gilbert,et al.  Stumbling on Happiness , 2015 .

[27]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Construction of Preferences by Constraint Satisfaction , 2022 .

[29]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[30]  P. Slovic,et al.  The Construction of Preference: Index , 2006 .

[31]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[32]  D. Ariely,et al.  Constructing Stable Preferences: A Look Into Dimensions of Experience and Their Impact on Preference Stability , 1999 .

[33]  L. Festinger.  Conflict, Decision, and Dissonance , 1964 .

[34]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction , 1999 .