Optimizing the design of storage facilities through the application of ISD and QRA

Abstract Four strategies can be used to achieve safety in chemical processes: inherent, passive, active and procedural. However, the strategy that offers the best results is the inherent safety approach, especially if it is applied during the initial stages of a project. Inherently Safer Design (ISD) permanently eliminates or reduces hazards, and thus avoids or diminishes the consequences of incidents. ISD can be applied using four strategies: substitution, minimization, moderation and simplification. In this paper, we propose a methodology that combines ISD strategies with Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) to optimize the design of storage installations. As 17% of major accidents in the chemical industry occur during the storage process and cause significant losses, it is essential to improve safety in such installations. The proposed method applies QRA to estimate the risk associated with a specific design. The design can then be compared to others to determine which is inherently safer. The risk analysis may incorporate complex phenomena such as the domino effect and possible impacts on vulnerable material and human elements. The methodology was applied to the San Juanico tragedy that occurred in Mexico in 1984.

[1]  Jonathan dela Cruz,et al.  Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) , 2015 .

[2]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Estimation of probabilities and likely consequences of a chain of accidents (domino effect) in Manali Industrial Complex , 2001 .

[3]  Azmi Mohd Shariff,et al.  Inherent risk assessment—A new concept to evaluate risk in preliminary design stage , 2009 .

[4]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The quantitative assessment of domino effects caused by overpressure. Part I. Probit models. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[5]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Threshold values for domino effects caused by blast wave interaction with process equipment , 2004 .

[6]  Esteban J. Bernechea,et al.  Design optimization of hazardous substance storage facilities to minimize project risk , 2013 .

[7]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The assessment of the damage probability of storage tanks in domino events triggered by fire. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Trevor Kletz Plant Design For Safety: A User-Friendly Approach , 1990 .

[9]  Josep Arnaldos,et al.  A model for estimating the impact of the domino effect on accident frequencies in quantitative risk assessments of storage facilities , 2013 .

[10]  Ernesto Salzano,et al.  Hazard of Pressurized Tanks Involved in Fires , 2003 .

[11]  Joaquim Casal Fàbrega,et al.  El riesgo químico y el territorio , 2010 .

[12]  Klaus D. Timmerhaus,et al.  Plant design and economics for chemical engineers , 1958 .

[13]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Application of domino effect quantitative risk assessment to an extended industrial area , 2009 .

[14]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Application of land-use planning criteria for the control of major accident hazards: a case-study. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[15]  Robin Smith,et al.  Chemical Process: Design and Integration , 2005 .

[16]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Consequences of major accidents: assessing the number of injured people. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.