The effect of memory schemata on memory and the phenomenological experience of naturalistic situations

Two experiments document the effect of memory schemata in naturalistic situations. Participants in both experiments watched a short videotaped lecture in which the instructor enacted several schema-consistent actions (e.g. writing on a whiteboard) and schema-inconsistent actions (e.g. smoking a cigarette). Following the videotaped lecture, participants completed a recognition test and rated the phenomenological content of their memories. In both experiments, memory was more accurate for schema-inconsistent actions than for schema-consistent actions. Participants also indicated that their memories of schema-inconsistent actions were more vivid than schema-consistent actions. Interestingly, in Experiment 2, the false memory rate for typical items increased across both 48-hour and one week retention intervals. These results have important implications for the processes of normal human memory in everyday situations. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  F. Bartlett,et al.  Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology , 1932 .

[2]  T. S. Hyde,et al.  Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. , 1969 .

[3]  R. E. Morin,et al.  Recognition reaction time for digits in consecutive and nonconsecutive memorized sets , 1970 .

[4]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[5]  D. Dooling,et al.  Intrusion of a thematic idea in retention of prose. , 1974 .

[6]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Recognition memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities: Tests of a script pointer + tag hypothesis , 1979 .

[7]  John B. Black,et al.  Scripts in memory for text , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  On Evaluating Story Grammars , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  W. Brewer,et al.  Role of schemata in memory for places , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  A. Graesser.  Prose Comprehension Beyond the Word , 1981 .

[11]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory , 1982 .

[12]  C SchankRoger,et al.  Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People , 1983 .

[13]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Is memory schematic , 1983 .

[14]  Francis T. Durso,et al.  Effect of schema-incongruent information on memory for stereotypical attributes. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  E. Tulving.  Memory and consciousness. , 1985 .

[16]  James R. Riha,et al.  Script processing in a natural situation , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[17]  E F Loftus,et al.  Qualities of the unreal. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  Memory for Real-World Scenes: The Role of Consistency With Schema Expectation , 1989 .

[21]  A. Parkin,et al.  Attention and recollective experience in recognition memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  Scripts for typical crimes and their effects on memory for eyewitness testimony , 1992 .

[23]  C. Stangor,et al.  Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. , 1992 .

[24]  Suparna Rajaram,et al.  Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[25]  E. Heit.  Modeling the Effects of Expectations on Recognition Memory , 1993 .

[26]  V. Reyna,et al.  Development of Gist versus Verbatim Memory in Sentence Recognition: Effects of Lexical Familiarity, Semantic Content, Encoding Instructions, and Retention Interval. , 1994 .

[27]  E. Loftus,et al.  Recovered memories of childhood abuse: A source monitoring perspective. , 1994 .

[28]  F. Strack,et al.  Memory for Nonoccurrences: Metacognitive and Presuppositional Strategies , 1994 .

[29]  Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision processes , 1994 .

[30]  V. Reyna,et al.  Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis , 1995 .

[31]  K. McDermott,et al.  Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. , 1995 .

[32]  Jason M. Blackwell,et al.  Memory Illusions: Recalling, Recognizing, and Recollecting Events that Never Occurred , 1996 .

[33]  V. L. Smith,et al.  What do you expect?: The influence of people's prior knowledge of crime categories on fact-finding , 1996 .

[34]  W. Donaldson,et al.  The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Charles J. Brainerd,et al.  Mere memory testing creates false memories in children. , 1996 .

[36]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[37]  D. G. Payne,et al.  Compelling Memory Illusions , 1997 .

[38]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[39]  David G. Payne,et al.  Memory illusions and consciousness: Examining the phenomenology of true and false memories , 1997 .

[40]  M. Greenberg,et al.  When Believing Is Seeing: The Effect of Scripts on Eyewitness Memory , 1998, Law and human behavior.

[41]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Verification of Statements about Story Worlds That Deviate from Normal Conceptions of Time: What Is True aboutEinstein's Dreams? , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  G. Cowan.  What are the important questions , 1999 .

[43]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Suppressing False Recognition in Younger and Older Adults: The Distinctiveness Heuristic ☆ ☆☆ ★ , 1999 .

[44]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Dynamic Memory Revisited , 1999 .

[45]  Michael P. Toglia,et al.  Recollections of things schematic: The influence of scripts on recollective experience , 2000 .

[46]  J. Lampinen,et al.  The impersistence of false memory persistence , 2000, Memory.

[47]  D. G. Payne,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of warnings and the phenomenological characteristics of false memories , 2001, Memory.

[48]  Ron Wright,et al.  Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection. , 2001 .

[49]  J. Neuschatz,et al.  Recollections of things schematic: room schemas revisited. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  Output monitoring tests reveal false memories of memories that never existed , 2001, Memory.