Discussion Tool Effects on Collaborative Learning and Social Network Structure

This study investigated the social network structure of booking officers at the Honolulu Police Department and how the introduction of an online discussion tool affected knowledge about operation of a booking module. Baseline data provided evidence for collaboration among officers in the same district using e-mail, telephone and face-to-face media but showed minimal collaboration between officers in different districts. On average, knowledge of the booking module was low. After introduction of the online discussion tool the social network structure changed, showing an increase in collaboration between different districts and an increase in knowledge of the booking module, even though frequency of collaboration did not increase significantly. The study suggests that the formation of new collaborative ties is more significant for learning through information sharing in social networks than raw frequency of interaction. This work is framed by theories of knowledge building, social architecture, and communities of practice.

[1]  R. Moreland,et al.  Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication? , 2000 .

[2]  Irma Bogenrieder,et al.  Social Architecture as a Prerequisite for Organizational Learning , 2002 .

[3]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[4]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[5]  D. Olson,et al.  The Handbook of education and human development : new models of learning, teaching, and schooling , 1996 .

[6]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[7]  Li Sha,et al.  An application of social network analysis to knowledge building , 2003 .

[8]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[9]  P. Resnick Beyond Bowling Together: SocioTechnical Capital , 2001 .

[10]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[11]  E. Wenger,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[12]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Media Use in a Global Corporation: Electronic Mail and Organizational Knowledge , 2003 .

[13]  R. Moreland,et al.  Group Versus Individual Training and Group Performance: The Mediating Role of Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[14]  Thomas W. Valente Network models of the diffusion of innovations , 1996, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[15]  Barry Wellman,et al.  For a social network analysis of computer networks: a sociological perspective on collaborative work and virtual community , 1996, SIGCPR '96.

[16]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[17]  Ckk Chan,et al.  Assessing and fostering knowledge building inquiry and discourse , 2001 .

[18]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[19]  W. Doise The social development of the intellect , 1984 .

[20]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  A Social Network Study of the Growth of Community Among Distance Learners , 1998, Inf. Res..

[21]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.