Understanding Social Media Logic

Over the past decade, social media platforms have penetrated deeply into the mech­anics of everyday life, affecting people's informal interactions, as well as institutional structures and professional routines. Far from being neutral platforms for everyone, social media have changed the conditions and rules of social interaction. In this article, we examine the intricate dynamic between social media platforms, mass media, users, and social institutions by calling attention to social media logic—the norms, strategies, mechanisms, and economies—underpin­ning its dynamics. This logic will be considered in light of what has been identified as mass me­dia logic, which has helped spread the media's powerful discourse outside its institutional boundaries. Theorizing social media logic, we identify four grounding principles—programmabil­ity, popularity, connectivity, and datafication—and argue that these principles become increas­ingly entangled with mass media logic. The logic of social media, rooted in these grounding principles and strategies, is gradually invading all areas of public life. Besides print news and broadcasting, it also affects law and order, social activism, politics, and so forth. Therefore, its sustaining logic and widespread dissemination deserve to be scrutinized in detail in order to better understand its impact in various domains. Concentrating on the tactics and strategies at work in social media logic, we reassess the constellation of power relationships in which social practices unfold, raising questions such as: How does social media logic modify or enhance ex­isting mass media logic? And how is this new media logic exported beyond the boundaries of (social or mass) media proper? The underlying principles, tactics, and strategies may be relat­ively simple to identify, but it is much harder to map the complex connections between plat­forms that distribute this logic: users that employ them, technologies that drive them, economic structures that scaffold them, and institutional bodies that incorporate them.

[1]  Eric Gossett,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2015 .

[2]  R. Milner Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture , 2014 .

[3]  James Mussell Raw Data is an Oxymoron , 2014 .

[4]  Viktor Mayer-Schnberger,et al.  Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think , 2013 .

[5]  Cherian George The Net Delusion: How not to liberate the world , 2013 .

[6]  Anne Helmond,et al.  The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web , 2013, New Media Soc..

[7]  Henry Jenkins,et al.  Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture , 2013 .

[8]  Terje Rasmussen,et al.  Internet-based media, Europe and the political public sphere , 2013 .

[9]  Pablo J. Boczkowski,et al.  The Relevance of Algorithms , 2013 .

[10]  J. Dijck The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media , 2013 .

[11]  Bernhard Rieder The refraction chamber: Twitter as sphere and network , 2012, First Monday.

[12]  M. Castells ”Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age”. , 2019 .

[13]  Anders Olof Larsson,et al.  Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign , 2012, New Media Soc..

[14]  W. Bennett,et al.  THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION , 2012 .

[15]  Taina Bucher,et al.  Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook , 2012, New Media Soc..

[16]  Eli Pariser The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think , 2012 .

[17]  Claes H. de Vreese,et al.  The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings , 2012 .

[18]  Eugenia Siapera,et al.  Understanding new media , 2012 .

[19]  Thomas Poell,et al.  Twitter as a Multilingual Space: The Articulation of the Tunisian Revolution Through #Sidibouzid , 2012 .

[20]  Louise Amoore,et al.  Data Derivatives , 2011 .

[21]  Mark Andrejevic,et al.  THE WORK THAT AFFECTIVE ECONOMICS DOES , 2011 .

[22]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Two hearts in three-quarter time: How to waltz the social media/viral marketing dance , 2011 .

[23]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2011 .

[24]  Wendy Hui Kyong Chun,et al.  Programmed Visions: Software and Memory , 2011 .

[25]  William Uricchio,et al.  The algorithmic turn: photosynth, augmented reality and the changing implications of the image , 2011 .

[26]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[27]  David M. Berry,et al.  The Philosophy of Software: Code and Mediation in the Digital Age , 2011 .

[28]  David A. Shamma,et al.  Characterizing debate performance via aggregated twitter sentiment , 2010, CHI.

[29]  Tarleton Gillespie,et al.  The politics of ‘platforms’ , 2010, New Media Soc..

[30]  Johan Bollen Determining the Public Mood State by Analysis of Microblogging Posts , 2010, ALIFE.

[31]  Patrick Paroubek,et al.  Twitter as a Corpus for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining , 2010, LREC.

[32]  David Beer,et al.  Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious , 2009, New Media Soc..

[33]  M. Castells Communication Power: Mass Communication, Mass Self-Communication and Power Relationships in the Network Society , 2009, Media and Society.

[34]  Gabrielle Durepos Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[35]  D. Graber When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrinaby W. Lance Bennett, Regina G. Lawrence, and Steven Livingston , 2008 .

[36]  William Uricchio,et al.  Television’s Next Generation: Technology/Interface Culture/Flow , 2004 .

[37]  Nick Couldry,et al.  Liveness, “Reality,” and the Mediated Habitus from Television to the Mobile Phone , 2004 .

[38]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy. , 2002 .

[39]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism , 2001, Digital Cities.

[40]  Let Us Infotain You: Politics in the New Media Age , 2001 .

[41]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[42]  Jarol B. Manheim,et al.  Mediated Politics: The Big Spin: Strategic Communication and the Transformation of Pluralist Democracy , 2000 .

[43]  Ivor Gaber Government by spin: an analysis of the process , 1999 .

[44]  Philip Auslander,et al.  Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture , 1999 .

[45]  R. Day Remediation: Understanding new media , 1999 .

[46]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Work, Friendship, and Media Use for Information Exchange in a Networked Organization , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[47]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Comparative perspectives on social movements : political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings , 1996 .

[48]  John D. McCarthy,et al.  Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing processes – toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social movements , 1996 .

[49]  Peter Lunt,et al.  Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate , 1993 .

[50]  Marshall McLuhan,et al.  Television: Technology and Cultural Form , 1978 .

[51]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  The Volunteer Subject , 1965 .