Notice of RetractionA Comparison of Perceptions on the Investment Theory of Creativity between Chinese and American

A social validation methodology was applied across two cultures to examine the perceptions of resources on enhancing creativity based on Sternberg & Lubart's (1991) investment theory of creativity. The importance of six resources were rated and ranked by adults from China (n=190) and the United States (n=57). Both American and Chinese considered motivation as the most important resource for human creativity. However, next to motivation, Mann-Whitney U tests revealed that Chinese adults were more inclined to emphasize the importance of intelligence (p < .001) and knowledge (p < .01), while Americans preferred to regard the importance of thinking styles (p < .05). Furthermore, the majority of Americans and Chinese considered that personal factors contributed more to creativity than situational factors. These findings indicate that the concept of creativity is partially culture-specific.

[1]  Jiannong Shi Intelligence current in creative activities1 , 2004 .

[2]  R. Sternberg Handbook of Creativity: Subject Index , 1998 .

[3]  R. Sternberg RETRACTED ARTICLE: The Nature of Creativity , 2006 .

[4]  R. Sternberg,et al.  An Investment Theory of Creativity and Its Development , 1991 .

[5]  Chi-yue Chiu,et al.  Multicultural experience enhances creativity: the when and how. , 2008, The American psychologist.

[6]  M. Morris,et al.  Culture and Cause: American and Chinese Attributions for Social and Physical Events , 1994 .

[7]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Investing in Creativity , 1993 .

[8]  Lin Chongde,et al.  THE COMPARISONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENTIFIC CREATIVITY BETWEEN ENGLISH AND CHINESE ADOLESCENTS , 2004 .

[9]  R. Sternberg Implicit theories of intelligence. creativity, and wisdom , 1985 .

[10]  Xiao-dong Yue Meritorious Evaluation Bias: How Chinese Undergraduates Perceive and Evaluate Chinese and Foreign Creators. , 2003 .

[11]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[12]  M. Runco,et al.  Parents' and Teachers' Implicit Theories of Children's Creativity: A Cross-Cultural Perspective , 2002 .

[13]  Panagiotis Kampylis,et al.  In-service and prospective teachers’ conceptions of creativity , 2009 .

[14]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Creating a Vision of Creativity: The First 25 Years , 2006 .

[15]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  ? + ? = creativity. , 2018, Public health nursing.

[16]  Xiaodong Yue,et al.  Perception of the most creative Chinese by undergraduates in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, and Taipei , 2002 .

[17]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity , 1998 .

[18]  M. Runco Teachers' Judgments of Creativity and Social Validation of Divergent Thinking Tests , 1984 .

[19]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Contemporary Studies on the Concept of Creativity: the East and the West , 2002 .

[20]  F. Palmer Socioeconomic Status and Intellective Performance Among Negro Preschool Boys. , 1970 .

[21]  Susannah B. F. Paletz,et al.  Implicit Theories of Creativity Across Cultures , 2008 .

[22]  T. Lubart Handbook of Creativity: Creativity Across Cultures , 1998 .

[23]  Howard E. Gruber,et al.  A Cross-cultural Study of the Development of Artistic Talent, Creativity and Giftedness , 2002 .