Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse

This article investigates structural aspects of source domains in metaphorical mappings with regard to their manifestation in public discourse data. Specifically, it analyses the organization of source concepts into mininarratives or "scenarios" that dominate the discourse manifestations of source domains. The material consists of examples from a bilingual corpus of British and German public debates about the &European Union.& The data show that while the two national samples share some basic mappings between the source and target domains, they each are characterised further by specific scenarios that provide focal points for conceptualizing the target topic. The scenarios can also be shown to carry evaluative and attitudinal biases that are related to particular political dispositions and preferences of the respective national discourse communities. In conclusion, it will be argued that the analysis of scenarios is a necessary complement to the study of source domains and of domain-mappings in metaphorical language use.

[1]  John A. Barnden,et al.  Domain-transcending mappings in a system for metaphorical reasoning , 2003, EACL.

[2]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[3]  J. Verschueren.  Language and ideology , 1999 .

[4]  Colin Good.  Attitudes Towards Europe: Language in the Unification Process , 2001 .

[5]  Hilary Putnam.  Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers , 1975 .

[6]  M. Leezenberg,et al.  Contexts of metaphor , 2001 .

[7]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Metaphor, metonymy, and binding , 2002 .

[8]  P. Polenz,et al.  Deutsche Sprachgeschichte vom Spätmittelalter bis zur Gegenwart , 2000 .

[9]  D. Baker,et al.  Britain for and against Europe : British politics and the question of European integration , 1998 .

[10]  A. Musolff.  Metaphor and Political Discourse , 2004 .

[11]  D. Gary Miller,et al.  1. Theoretical Prerequisites , 1994 .

[12]  J. Charteris-Black.  Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis , 2004 .

[13]  R. Dirven,et al.  Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast , 2003 .

[14]  Alain Rey,et al.  Dictionnaire alphabétique & analogique de la langue française , 1974 .

[15]  Joerg Zinken,et al.  Ideological Imagination: Intertextual and Correlational Metaphors in Political Discourse , 2003 .

[16]  Boris Paraschkewow.  Friedrich Kluge. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Bearb. von Elmar Seebold. 24., durchges. und erw. Aufl. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter, 2002, 1023 S. , 2004 .

[17]  R. Dirven,et al.  Language and Ideology: Volume 2: descriptive cognitive approaches , 2001 .

[18]  C. Fillmore.  An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Meaning , 1975 .

[19]  A. Musolff.  Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe , 2004 .

[20]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[21]  G. Lakoff.  Don't Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate--The Essential Guide for Progressives , 2004 .

[22]  J. V. Deth.  Deutschland in Europa , 2004 .

[23]  Alice Deignan,et al.  Combining Large and Small Corpora to Investigate Tuning Devices Around Metaphor in Spoken Discourse , 2003 .

[24]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies , 1993 .

[25]  George Lakoff,et al.  Moral politics : what conservatives know that liberals don't , 1998 .

[26]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[27]  Michael White,et al.  Metaphor and economics: the case of growth , 2003 .

[28]  G. Lakoff.  Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .