Indoor Localization With Range-Based Measurements and Little Prior Information

We address the problem of indoor localization with networks of sensors taking range-based measurements in the presence of very little prior information. We propose several robust methods that do not require previous measurement campaigns when a network is deployed. The focus is on networks of ultrawideband sensors, but the proposed range-based methods can also be applied to other types of sensor networks. The location of a target node is estimated from measured distances to anchor nodes of known positions. We allow for the possibility of large errors in the range measurements due to undetected direct path (UDP) propagation conditions. In mitigating the UDP effect, our approach is to combine intermediate location estimates from different subsets of beacons. We propose novel criteria for identifying the combinations that produce bad estimates. These combinations are then discarded in obtaining the final estimates. Simulations reveal that the proposed methods achieve improved performance with respect to that of existing techniques that exploit the same prior information. Under many scenarios, the proposed methods reach the performance of some algorithms that exploit more prior information.

[1]  Chia-Chin Chong,et al.  NLOS Identification and Weighted Least-Squares Localization for UWB Systems Using Multipath Channel Statistics , 2008, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[2]  G.B. Giannakis,et al.  Localization via ultra-wideband radios: a look at positioning aspects for future sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[3]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Fundamental Limits of Wideband Localization— Part I: A General Framework , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Sinan Gezici,et al.  A Survey on Wireless Position Estimation , 2008, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[5]  Weihua Zhuang,et al.  Nonline-of-sight error mitigation in mobile location , 2005, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..

[6]  GeziciSinan A Survey on Wireless Position Estimation , 2008 .

[7]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Fundamental Limits of Wideband Localization— Part II: Cooperative Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  R.L. Moses,et al.  Locating the nodes: cooperative localization in wireless sensor networks , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[9]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Network localization and navigation via cooperation , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[10]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  NLOS Identification and Mitigation for Localization , 2010 .

[11]  Reiner S. Thomä,et al.  Range-Based Localization for UWB Sensor Networks in Realistic Environments , 2010, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[12]  Pi-Chun Chen,et al.  A non-line-of-sight error mitigation algorithm in location estimation , 1999, WCNC. 1999 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (Cat. No.99TH8466).

[13]  Kaveh Pahlavan,et al.  A New Statistical Model for the Behavior of Ranging Errors in TOA-Based Indoor Localization , 2007, 2007 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[14]  Juha-Pekka Makela,et al.  Indoor geolocation science and technology , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[15]  Kaveh Pahlavan,et al.  Modeling of the TOA-based distance measurement error using UWB indoor radio measurements , 2006, IEEE Communications Letters.

[16]  Chuan Heng Foh,et al.  Hybrid RF Mapping and Kalman Filtered Spring Relaxation for Sensor Network Localization , 2012, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[17]  Kaveh Pahlavan,et al.  Indoor geolocation in the absence of direct path , 2006, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[18]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Ranging With Ultrawide Bandwidth Signals in Multipath Environments , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[19]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Network Experimentation for Cooperative Localization , 2012, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[20]  Umberto Mengali,et al.  A Maximum Likelihood UWB Localization Algorithm Exploiting Knowledge of the Service Area Layout , 2013, Wirel. Pers. Commun..