An Examination of Test-Wiseness In the Cognitive Test Domain

The construct of test-wiseness (TW) has a relatively short history in educational research. Originally suggested as a possible effector of reliability (Thorndike, 1951), it has since become a frequently used term, but one not without its problems of interpretation. Early confusion over the precise components and functioning of TW stemmed from the fact that although most test-constructors testified to its existence, no empirical research was performed to thoroughly examine the construct. Thorndike's pioneering discussion of TW classified it as a possible source of variance in test scores, and described it as a persistent general trait of the test-taker. Although he did postulate possible characteristics of the test-wise individual, Thorndike's brief treatise of TW was descriptive in nature, and did not suggest any specific directions for research. Similarly, in another early appearance in the literature, TW was listed as a component of response variance in objective test questions, but no experimentation was cited or proposed (Ebel & Damrin, 1960). In providing the first thorough empirical investigation of TW, Gibb (1964) illustrated the dearth of research, by claiming that the most complete reference on the subject was the early work of Thorndike (1951). However, Gibb's own work altered that circumstance. In examining individual differences in TW skills, he provided an operational definition of TW, and also developed an instrument to measure the construct.

[1]  John W. Wick Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. , 1980 .

[2]  ARE INNER CITY CHILDREN TEST‐WISE? , 1977 .

[3]  I. Wedman,et al.  On Test‐Wiseness and Some Related Constructs , 1976 .

[4]  Frederic M. Lord,et al.  FORMULA SCORING AND NUMBER-RIGHT SCORING1 , 1975 .

[5]  John C. Jessell,et al.  The Effect of Keyed Response Sequencing of Multiple Choice Items on Performance. , 1975 .

[6]  Katheryn K. Woodley Test-Wiseness: A Cognitive Function?. , 1975 .

[7]  Ingvar Nilsson The occurence of test-wiseness and the possibility of inducing it via instruction : a cross-sectional study , 1975 .

[8]  M. Slakter,et al.  LONGITUDINAL STUDIES OF TEST‐WISENESS , 1974 .

[9]  Valeria A. Ford Everything You Wanted To Know About Test-Wiseness. , 1973 .

[10]  D. H. Bauer Error Sources in Aptitude and Achievement Scores: A Review and Recommendation. , 1973 .

[11]  Carl Callenbach THE EFFECTS OF INSTRUCTION AND PRACTICE IN CONTENT‐INDEPENDENT TEST‐TAKING TECHNIQUES UPON THE STANDARDIZED READING TEST SCORES OF SELECTED SECOND‐GRADE STUDENTS , 1973 .

[12]  F. Pyrczak Use of Similarities between Stems and Keyed Choices in Multiple-Choice Items. , 1973 .

[13]  T. Oakland The Effects of Test-Wiseness Materials on Standardized Test Performance of Preschool Disadvantaged Children. , 1972 .

[14]  EFFECTS OF VIOLATING ITEM CONSTRUCTION PRINCIPLES1 , 1972 .

[15]  The Effect of Selected Poor Item-Writing Practices on Test Difficulty, Reliability and Validity: A Replication. , 1972 .

[16]  James J. Diamond,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF THE COGNITIVE CORRELATES OF TEST‐WISENESS 1,2 , 1972 .

[17]  Test Sophistication: An Important Consideration , 1972 .

[18]  R. L. Ebel,et al.  Essentials of educational measurement , 1972 .

[19]  Effects of Guidance on the Results of Standardized Achievement Testing. , 1971 .

[20]  James C. Moore Test Wiseness and Analogy Test Performance. , 1971 .

[21]  M. Slakter,et al.  LEARNING TEST‐WISENESS BY PROGRAMMED TEXTS1 , 1970 .

[22]  M. Slakter,et al.  GRADE LEVEL, SEX, AND SELECTED ASPECTS OF TEST‐WISENESS1 , 1970 .

[23]  Henry A. Alker,et al.  Multiple-choice questions and student characteristics. , 1969 .

[24]  Robert L. Ebel,et al.  BLIND GUESSING ON OBJECTIVE ACHIEVEMENT TESTS1 , 1968 .

[25]  L. Kreit The Effects of Test-Taking Practice on Pupil Test Performance1 , 1968 .

[26]  M. Slakter THE EFFECT OF GUESSING STRATEGY ON OBJECTIVE TEST SCORES1 , 1968 .

[27]  F. Boersma,et al.  The Influence of Test-Wiseness Upon Achievement , 1968 .

[28]  M. Slakter THE PENALTY FOR NOT GUESSING1 , 1968 .

[29]  The effects of anxiety and item difficulty sequence on achievement testing scores. , 1968, The Journal of psychology.

[30]  J. Millman,et al.  A Comparison of the Performance of American and Indonesian Students on Three Types of Test Items , 1966 .

[31]  R. L. Baker,et al.  The Application of a Self-Instructional Technique to Develop a Test-Taking Strategy , 1966 .

[32]  R. L. Ebel,et al.  An Analysis of Test-Wiseness , 1965 .

[33]  K. Hopkins,et al.  Intraindividual and Interindividual Positional Preference Response Styles in Ability Tests , 1964 .

[34]  Clinton I. Chase,et al.  Relative Length of Option and Response Set in Multiple Choice Items , 1964 .

[35]  Test difficulty, reliability, and discrimination as functions of item difficulty order. , 1964 .

[36]  Score : the strategy of taking tests , 1964 .

[37]  A. Gustav RESPONSE SET IN OBJECTIVE ACHIEVEMENT TESTS. , 1963, The Journal of psychology.

[38]  Leonard Wevrick Response Set in a Multiple-Choice Test , 1962 .

[39]  Students’ Perceptions of Factors Affecting Test Performance , 1962 .

[40]  Gilbert Sax,et al.  An Investigation of Response Sets on Altered Parallel Forms , 1962 .

[41]  T. F. Dunn,et al.  Test Difficulty, Validity, and Reliability as Functions of Selected Multiple-Choice Item Construction Principles , 1959 .

[42]  A. Montagu A Comprehensive Dictionary of Psychological and Psychoanalytical Terms , 1959 .

[43]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  Gilbert Sax,et al.  Systematic Biases in the Keying of Correct Responses on Certain Standardized Tests , 1958 .

[45]  How to take examinations in college , 1958 .

[46]  I. A. Berg,et al.  Response Sets in a Multiple-Choice Test , 1955 .

[47]  L. Cronbach Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design , 1950 .

[48]  L. Cronbach Response Sets and Test Validity , 1946 .

[49]  W. Decker Tests and Examinations , 1928 .