An examination of critical success factors in the implementation of ePortfolios in universities

Many Australian university teachers have been experimenting with the use of ePortfolio applications as a learning tool for students in recent years. The typical characteristics of an ePortfolio include a learner-centred approach, formative assessment, and collaborative sharing. These characteristics enable a highly individualised elearning environment. However, few teachers conduct early assessments to determine if their students, syllabi, and learning environments suit the implementation of ePortfolios. This paper presents an overview of the critical success factors in elearning and mlearning from existing literature and offers a set of critical success factors which could be used by teachers to determine if the use of ePortfolios is appropriate for their class settings. The identification of these factors is based on investigations of previous successes and failures of ePortfolio projects and other elearning systems and tools in learning environments. While previous research focused primarily on pedagogical approaches, technology, or aspects of the learning environment, this work-in-progress attempts to adopt a broader perspective, taking into consideration other factors such as social network strategies, usability studies, and factors in human–computer interaction design. It is argued that a preliminary assessment of the critical success factors would help the teacher to decide whether to use ePortfolios, and minimise the chances of failure or rejection by students. The identification of the critical success factors would lead to a comprehensive model for the implementation of ePortfolios in universities.

[1]  Roger Bateman,et al.  Reflections on 3 years of mlearning implementation (2007-2009) , 2010 .

[2]  J. Chau,et al.  Towards understanding the potential of e-portfolios for independent learning: A qualitative study , 2010 .

[3]  Siobhan Thomas,et al.  Pervasive, persuasive elearning: modeling the pervasive learning space , 2005, Third IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops.

[4]  Sarah R Lambert,et al.  Moving towards a University-wide implementation of an ePortfolio tool , 2007 .

[5]  Brenda Mallinson,et al.  A Proposed Theoretical Model for M-Learning Adoption in Developing Countries , 2005 .

[6]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Information Technology for Management: Making Connections for Strategic Advantage , 2000 .

[7]  Dowming Yeh,et al.  What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Robin Mason,et al.  The Educational Potential of e-Portfolios: Supporting Personal Development and Reflective Learning , 2007 .

[9]  Gillian C. Hallam,et al.  The ePortfolio as a tool for lifelong learning: Contextualising Australian practice , 2008 .

[10]  Christian Dorninger,et al.  Future Learning Strategy and ePortfolios in Education , 2008, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[11]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Online Social Networks: Why Do "We" Use Facebook? , 2008, WSKS.

[12]  Hasan Tinmaz,et al.  Implementing Project-Based Learning And E-Portfolio Assessment In an Undergraduate Course , 2006 .

[13]  C. Taran,et al.  Motivation techniques in elearning , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05).

[14]  Gary Greenberg,et al.  The Digital Convergence. Extending The Portfolio Model. , 2004 .

[15]  Hassan M. Selim,et al.  Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[16]  J. Chau A developer's challenges on an ePortfolio journey , 2007 .

[17]  Doris U. Bolliger,et al.  Student perceptions of ePortfolio integration in online courses , 2010 .

[18]  Leif M. Hokstad,et al.  Digital literacy - towards a re description of literacy for the digital learning environments. Paper presented at the Conference Interactive Computer Aided Learning, 26-28 September, Villach, Austria , 2007 .

[19]  Elizabeth Hartnell-Young,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF ACKNOWLEDGING LEARNING PROCESSES IN ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF EPORTFOLIOS , .

[20]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Authentic mobile learning in higher education , 2007 .

[21]  Building community: Introducing ePortfolios in university education , 2008 .

[22]  K. Allmendinger Social Presence in Synchronous Virtual Learning Situations: The Role of Nonverbal Signals Displayed by Avatars , 2010 .

[23]  Charles B. Hodges Designing to Motivate: Motivational Techniques to Incorporate in E-Learning Experiences , 2004 .

[24]  Brett A. Bumgarner,et al.  You have been poked: Exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults , 2007, First Monday.

[25]  Lori Howard,et al.  Curry CONNECT: How Online Discourse Creates Community for Education Students. , 1998 .

[26]  Douglas Love,et al.  Portfolios to Webfolios and beyond: Levels of Maturation , 2004 .

[27]  Youmei Liu,et al.  ePortfolios: Beyond Assessment , 2006 .

[28]  Patrick R. Lowenthal The evolution and influence of social presence theory on online learning , 2010 .

[29]  Gillian C. Hallam,et al.  ePortfolio use by university students in Australia: Informing excellence in policy and practice , 2008 .

[30]  Douglas Love,et al.  On Implementing Web-Based Electronic Portfolios. , 2002 .

[31]  Michelle Drouin,et al.  The Relationship Between Students' Perceived Sense of Community and Satisfaction, Achievement, and Retention in an Online Course , 2008 .

[32]  Benjamin Kehrwald,et al.  Understanding social presence in text‐based online learning environments , 2008 .

[33]  K Scheele Strategic planning in selection of a lab information system. , 1988, MLO: medical laboratory observer.

[34]  J. Ittelson Building an E-dentity for Each Student , 2001 .

[35]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[36]  Julie Hughes,et al.  Letting in the Trojan mouse: Using an eportfolio system to re-think pedagogy , 2008 .

[37]  Thierry Volery,et al.  Critical success factors in online education , 2000 .

[38]  Chi-Cheng Chang,et al.  Use and performances of Web-based portfolio assessment , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[39]  Helen C. Barrett,et al.  Balancing the Two Faces of ePortfolios , 2010 .

[40]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook , 2008, CHI.

[41]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[42]  Barbara Illsley,et al.  Using ePortfolios to Enhance Reflective Learning and Development , 2006 .

[43]  Theo J. Bastiaens,et al.  The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[44]  Hock Chuan Chan,et al.  Critical success factors for on-line course resources , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[45]  Tanko Ishaya,et al.  Enhancing effective eportfolios through agents , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05).

[46]  Helen Barrett and Joanne Carney,et al.  Conflicting Paradigms and Competing Purposes in Electronic Portfolio Development , 2005 .

[47]  Henrique Mello Rodrigues de Freitas,et al.  WEB-BASED DISTANCE LEARNING PROGRAMMES: AN EXPLORATORY INVESTIGATION OF ITS CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS , 2003 .

[48]  Mark Brown An Eportfolio In Initial Teacher Education: Reflecting On The Pillars Of Learning , 2008, e-Learning.

[49]  Rochelle Alison Duke Students' Learning Experiences with the  Web 2.0 Tool MyPortfolio: a Case Study of One High School Classroom , 2010 .

[50]  Jen Harvey,et al.  Reflective Learning, Future Thinking: Digital Repositories, e-Portfolios, Informal Learning and Ubiquitous Computing , 2005 .

[51]  Gr Hammond,et al.  Design, implementation and evaluation of a ‘generic’ ePortfolio: the University of Newcastle Upon Tyne experience , 2012 .