Multiple constraints on semantic integration in a hierarchical structure: ERP evidence from German
暂无分享,去创建一个
Xiaoming Jiang | Xiaolin Zhou | Yang Zhang | Henrik Saalbach | Xiaolin Zhou | Xiaoming Jiang | Henrik Saalbach | Yang Zhang
[1] Z. Ye,et al. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: An ERP study , 2010, Neuropsychologia.
[2] Xiaolin Zhou,et al. Executive control in language processing , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[3] S. Pinker,et al. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky) , 2005, Cognition.
[4] A. Friederici,et al. Semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2006, Brain Research.
[5] L. Osterhout,et al. The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .
[6] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[7] A. Friederici,et al. Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[8] G. Mulder,et al. When syntax meets semantics. , 1997, Psychophysiology.
[9] Marta Kutas,et al. Electrophysiological analysis of context effects in Alzheimer's disease. , 2003, Neuropsychology.
[10] Z. Ye,et al. Involvement of cognitive control in sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs , 2008, Brain Research.
[11] H. Kolk,et al. Late positivities in unusual situations , 2007, Brain and Language.
[12] E. Gibson. Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.
[13] Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al. Monitoring in language perception: Evidence from ERPs in a picture–sentence matching task , 2008, Neuropsychologia.
[14] Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al. When Heuristics Clash with Parsing Routines: ERP Evidence for Conflict Monitoring in Sentence Perception , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[15] Colin M. Brown,et al. The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .
[16] Phillip J. Holcomb,et al. Neural correlates of processing syntactic, semantic, and thematic relationships in sentences , 2006 .
[17] A. Anwander,et al. The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[18] Elsi Kaiser,et al. The Effect of Classifiers in Predicting Chinese Relative Clauses , 2010 .
[19] A. Friederici. Processing local transitions versus long-distance syntactic hierarchies , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[20] D. Caplan,et al. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[21] Liina Pylkkänen,et al. Distinct effects of semantic plausibility and semantic composition in MEG , 2004 .
[22] P. Hagoort. Interplay between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension: ERP Effects of Combining Syntactic and Semantic Violations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[23] Gina R. Kuperberg,et al. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.
[24] H. Kolk,et al. The interplay of heuristics and parsing routines in sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs and reaction times , 2007, Biological Psychology.
[25] David R. Dowty. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .
[26] A. Friederici,et al. Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[27] Ping Li,et al. Mental Representation of Verb Meaning: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[28] Matthias Schlesewsky,et al. Beyond syntax: Language-related positivities reflect the revision of hierarchies , 2002, Neuroreport.
[29] M. Garrett,et al. Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[30] W. Sommer,et al. Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: A brain potential study of noun–adjective agreement in Spanish , 2006, Brain Research.
[31] Ellen F. Lau,et al. A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[32] D. Caplan,et al. The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2007, Brain and Language.
[33] John C J Hoeks,et al. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[34] M. Kutas,et al. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.
[35] A. Friederici,et al. Neural basis of processing sequential and hierarchical syntactic structures , 2007, Human brain mapping.
[37] Matthias Schlesewsky,et al. On incremental interpretation: Degrees of meaning accessed during sentence comprehension , 2004 .
[38] E. Gibson,et al. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .
[39] Noam Chomsky,et al. Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .
[40] H. Kolk,et al. An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[41] Francesco Vespignani,et al. A deeper reanalysis of a superficial feature: An ERP study on agreement violations , 2008, Brain Research.
[42] Giosuè Baggio,et al. Computing and recomputing discourse models : An ERP study , 2008 .
[43] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing , 2007, Brain Research.
[44] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.
[45] Peter Hagoort,et al. Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. , 2003, Psychophysiology.
[46] Matthias Schlesewsky,et al. An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.
[47] P. Gordon,et al. The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.
[48] Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al. Conflicts in language processing: A new perspective on the N400–P600 distinction , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[49] Xiaolin Zhou,et al. Processing different levels of syntactic hierarchy: An ERP study on Chinese , 2009, Neuropsychologia.
[50] H. Kolk,et al. Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.
[51] Aniruddh D. Patel,et al. Language, music, syntax and the brain , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.
[52] S. Geisser,et al. On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .
[53] Angela D. Friederici,et al. Hierarchical and Linear Sequence Processing: An Electrophysiological Exploration of Two Different Grammar Types , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[54] P. Hagoort,et al. The interaction of discourse context and world knowledge in online sentence comprehension. Evidence from the N400 , 2007, Brain Research.
[55] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Finding the right word: Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.
[56] C. Petten. A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials , 1993 .
[57] Phillip J. Holcomb,et al. Two Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Semantic Integration during the Comprehension of Visual Real-world Events , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[58] G. Altmann,et al. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.
[59] M. Schlesewsky,et al. Think globally: Cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension , 2011, Brain and Language.
[60] A. Friederici,et al. Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Steps in Syntactic Analysis: Early Automatic and Late Controlled Processes , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[61] Xiaolin Zhou,et al. The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: An ERP study , 2007, Brain Research.
[62] Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al. The Role of Prominence Information in the Real-Time Comprehension of Transitive Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Approach , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[63] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .
[64] Xiaolin Zhou,et al. Processing the universal quantifier during sentence comprehension: ERP evidence , 2009, Neuropsychologia.
[65] P. Holcomb,et al. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .
[66] D. Kemmerer,et al. Big brown dog or brown big dog? An electrophysiological study of semantic constraints on prenominal adjective order , 2007, Brain and Language.
[67] Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al. Exploring the nature of the ‘subject’-preference: Evidence from the online comprehension of simple sentences in Mandarin Chinese , 2009 .
[68] Shlomo Bentin,et al. Differential integration efforts of mandatory and optional sentence constituents. , 2006, Psychophysiology.
[69] L. Pylkkänen,et al. Semantics vs. world knowledge in prefrontal cortex , 2009 .
[70] Hartmut Leuthold,et al. Processing local pragmatic anomalies in fictional contexts: evidence from the N400. , 2008, Psychophysiology.
[71] A. Friederici,et al. Verb Argument Structure Processing: The Role of Verb-Specific and Argument-Specific Information☆☆☆ , 2000 .
[72] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[73] Colin M. Brown,et al. Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 1999 .
[74] Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al. Monitoring in Language Perception: Mild and Strong Conflicts Elicit Different ERP Patterns , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[75] Marta Kutas,et al. Working Memory Capacity Dissociates Lexical and Sentential Context Effects , 1997 .
[76] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Testing the limits of the semantic illusion phenomenon: ERPs reveal temporary semantic change deafness in discourse comprehension. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[77] Ellen F. Lau,et al. A lexical basis for N400 context effects: Evidence from MEG , 2009, Brain and Language.
[78] D. Poeppel,et al. The linguistic processes underlying the P600 , 2010 .
[79] Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al. The role of animacy in the real time comprehension of Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from auditory event-related brain potentials , 2008, Brain and Language.
[80] Alfred Anwander,et al. Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.