Multiple constraints on semantic integration in a hierarchical structure: ERP evidence from German

A recent ERP study on Chinese demonstrated dissociable neural responses to semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy (Zhou et al., 2010). However, it is unclear whether such findings are restricted to a non-case marked language that relies heavily on word order and semantic information for the construction of sentence representation. This study aimed to further investigate, in a case-marked language, how semantic processes in a hierarchical structure take place during sentence reading. We used German sentences with the structure "subject noun+verb+article/determiner+adjective+object noun+prepositional phrase", in which the object noun was constrained either at the lower level by the adjective or at the higher level by the verb, and manipulated the semantic congruency between the adjective and the object noun and/or between the verb and the object noun. EEGs were recorded while participants read sentences and judged for their semantic acceptability. Compared with correct sentences, a biphasic pattern of an N400 effect followed by a late positivity effect was observed on the object noun for sentences with either lower- or higher-level mismatch or with double mismatches. Both the N400 effect and the late positivity (P600) effect were larger for the double mismatch condition than for either of the single mismatch conditions. These findings demonstrate cross-language mechanisms for processing multiple semantic constraints at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension.

[1]  Z. Ye,et al.  Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: An ERP study , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  Executive control in language processing , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[3]  S. Pinker,et al.  The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky) , 2005, Cognition.

[4]  A. Friederici,et al.  Semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2006, Brain Research.

[5]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[6]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  A. Friederici,et al.  Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[8]  G. Mulder,et al.  When syntax meets semantics. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[9]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiological analysis of context effects in Alzheimer's disease. , 2003, Neuropsychology.

[10]  Z. Ye,et al.  Involvement of cognitive control in sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs , 2008, Brain Research.

[11]  H. Kolk,et al.  Late positivities in unusual situations , 2007, Brain and Language.

[12]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[13]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in language perception: Evidence from ERPs in a picture–sentence matching task , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  When Heuristics Clash with Parsing Routines: ERP Evidence for Conflict Monitoring in Sentence Perception , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[16]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Neural correlates of processing syntactic, semantic, and thematic relationships in sentences , 2006 .

[17]  A. Anwander,et al.  The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Elsi Kaiser,et al.  The Effect of Classifiers in Predicting Chinese Relative Clauses , 2010 .

[19]  A. Friederici Processing local transitions versus long-distance syntactic hierarchies , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  D. Caplan,et al.  Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  Distinct effects of semantic plausibility and semantic composition in MEG , 2004 .

[22]  P. Hagoort Interplay between Syntax and Semantics during Sentence Comprehension: ERP Effects of Combining Syntactic and Semantic Violations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[24]  H. Kolk,et al.  The interplay of heuristics and parsing routines in sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs and reaction times , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[25]  David R. Dowty Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[26]  A. Friederici,et al.  Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: early and late event-related brain potential effects. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Ping Li,et al.  Mental Representation of Verb Meaning: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Beyond syntax: Language-related positivities reflect the revision of hierarchies , 2002, Neuroreport.

[29]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  W. Sommer,et al.  Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: A brain potential study of noun–adjective agreement in Spanish , 2006, Brain Research.

[31]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  D. Caplan,et al.  The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2007, Brain and Language.

[33]  John C J Hoeks,et al.  Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[34]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[35]  A. Friederici,et al.  Neural basis of processing sequential and hierarchical syntactic structures , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[37]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  On incremental interpretation: Degrees of meaning accessed during sentence comprehension , 2004 .

[38]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[39]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[40]  H. Kolk,et al.  An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[41]  Francesco Vespignani,et al.  A deeper reanalysis of a superficial feature: An ERP study on agreement violations , 2008, Brain Research.

[42]  Giosuè Baggio,et al.  Computing and recomputing discourse models : An ERP study , 2008 .

[43]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[44]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[45]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[46]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.

[47]  P. Gordon,et al.  The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[48]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  Conflicts in language processing: A new perspective on the N400–P600 distinction , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[49]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  Processing different levels of syntactic hierarchy: An ERP study on Chinese , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  H. Kolk,et al.  Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.

[51]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Language, music, syntax and the brain , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[53]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Hierarchical and Linear Sequence Processing: An Electrophysiological Exploration of Two Different Grammar Types , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  P. Hagoort,et al.  The interaction of discourse context and world knowledge in online sentence comprehension. Evidence from the N400 , 2007, Brain Research.

[55]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Finding the right word: Hemispheric asymmetries in the use of sentence context information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  C. Petten A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials , 1993 .

[57]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Two Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Semantic Integration during the Comprehension of Visual Real-world Events , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[59]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  Think globally: Cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension , 2011, Brain and Language.

[60]  A. Friederici,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Two Steps in Syntactic Analysis: Early Automatic and Late Controlled Processes , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[61]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  The semantic processing of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: An ERP study , 2007, Brain Research.

[62]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  The Role of Prominence Information in the Real-Time Comprehension of Transitive Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Approach , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[63]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .

[64]  Xiaolin Zhou,et al.  Processing the universal quantifier during sentence comprehension: ERP evidence , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[65]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[66]  D. Kemmerer,et al.  Big brown dog or brown big dog? An electrophysiological study of semantic constraints on prenominal adjective order , 2007, Brain and Language.

[67]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  Exploring the nature of the ‘subject’-preference: Evidence from the online comprehension of simple sentences in Mandarin Chinese , 2009 .

[68]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Differential integration efforts of mandatory and optional sentence constituents. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[69]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Semantics vs. world knowledge in prefrontal cortex , 2009 .

[70]  Hartmut Leuthold,et al.  Processing local pragmatic anomalies in fictional contexts: evidence from the N400. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[71]  A. Friederici,et al.  Verb Argument Structure Processing: The Role of Verb-Specific and Argument-Specific Information☆☆☆ , 2000 .

[72]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[73]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 1999 .

[74]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in Language Perception: Mild and Strong Conflicts Elicit Different ERP Patterns , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[75]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Working Memory Capacity Dissociates Lexical and Sentential Context Effects , 1997 .

[76]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Testing the limits of the semantic illusion phenomenon: ERPs reveal temporary semantic change deafness in discourse comprehension. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[77]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  A lexical basis for N400 context effects: Evidence from MEG , 2009, Brain and Language.

[78]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The linguistic processes underlying the P600 , 2010 .

[79]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  The role of animacy in the real time comprehension of Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from auditory event-related brain potentials , 2008, Brain and Language.

[80]  Alfred Anwander,et al.  Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.