Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: a literature review

Abstract The aim of this review is to identify specific types of guidance for supporting student use of online labs, that is, virtual and remote labs, in an inquiry context. To do so, we reviewed the literature on providing guidance within computer supported inquiry learning (CoSIL) environments in science education and classified all identified guidance according to a recent taxonomy of types of guidance. In addition, we classified the types of guidance in phases of inquiry. Moreover, we examined whether the types of guidance identified for each inquiry phase were found to be effective in promoting student learning, as documented in the CoSIL research. This review identifies what types of effective guidance currently exist and can be applied in developing future CoSIL environments, especially CoSIL environments with online labs. It also highlights the needs/shortcomings of these available types of guidance. Such information is crucial for the design and development of future CoSIL environments with online labs.

[1]  Hsin-Kai Wu,et al.  Modelling a Complex System: Using novice‐expert analysis for developing an effective technology‐enhanced learning environment , 2010 .

[2]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  How Scientists Think in the Real World: Implications for Science Education , 2000 .

[3]  Elliot Soloway,et al.  Pocket PiCoMap: a case study in designing and assessing a handheld concept mapping tool for learners , 2003, CHI '03.

[4]  J. Arnold,et al.  Understanding Students' Experiments—What kind of support do they need in inquiry tasks? , 2014 .

[5]  D. Klahr,et al.  All other things being equal: acquisition and transfer of the control of variables strategy. , 1999, Child development.

[6]  Arantza Díaz de Ilarraza Sánchez,et al.  Computer Aided Learning and Instruction in Science and Engineering , 1996, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Causal Models and Experimentation Strategies in Scientific Reasoning , 1991 .

[8]  Brian R. Belland,et al.  Portraits of middle school students constructing evidence-based arguments during problem-based learning: the impact of computer-based scaffolds , 2010 .

[9]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  Wie lässt sich die Experimentierstrategie-Nutzung fördern? , 2012 .

[10]  Ellen T. Kamp,et al.  Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle , 2015 .

[11]  Ton de Jong,et al.  The Integration of Computer Simulation and Learning Support: An Example from the Physics Domain of Collisions , 1999 .

[12]  Quinn James,et al.  The Effects of Simulation Complexity and Hypothesis-Generation Strategy on Learning , 1994 .

[13]  J. E. Tschirgi,et al.  Sensible reasoning: A hypothesis about hypotheses. , 1980 .

[14]  R. Slavin,et al.  Experimental Evaluations of Elementary Science Programs: A Best-Evidence Synthesis , 2014 .

[15]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  Concept Discovery in a Scientific Domain , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Byung-Ro Lim,et al.  Challenges and issues in designing inquiry on the Web , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  P. Pintrich.  The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. , 2000 .

[18]  Ann Jones,et al.  Personal Inquiry: Orchestrating Science Investigations Within and Beyond the Classroom , 2015 .

[19]  D. Leutner,et al.  Is it Merely a Question of “What” to Prompt or Also “When” to Prompt? , 2009 .

[20]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Beyond intelligent tutoring systems: Using computers as METAcognitive tools to enhance learning? , 2002 .

[21]  Astrid Wichmann,et al.  Inquiry Learning: Multilevel Support with Respect to Inquiry, Explanations and Regulation During an Inquiry Cycle , 2009 .

[22]  Inge Molenaar,et al.  The effects of scaffolding metacognitive activities in small groups , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Z. Zacharia,et al.  Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education , 2013, Science.

[24]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Supporting hypothesis generation by learners exploring an interactive computer simulation , 1991 .

[25]  Ton de Jong,et al.  The Guided Discovery Learning Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2014 .

[26]  T. Jong,et al.  Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning , 2007 .

[27]  T. Jong,et al.  Supporting simulation-based learning; the effects of model progression and assignments on definitional and intuitive knowledge , 1998 .

[28]  R. Azevedo.  Computer Environments as Metacognitive Tools for Enhancing Learning , 2005 .

[29]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  A General Platform for Inquiry Learning , 2002, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[30]  Mark Girod,et al.  Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: Teaching for aesthetic understanding , 2003 .

[31]  Georgios Olympiou,et al.  Making the invisible visible: enhancing students’ conceptual understanding by introducing representations of abstract objects in a simulation , 2013 .

[32]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Technological Advances in Inquiry Learning , 2006 .

[33]  Jill A. Marshall,et al.  Preservice teachers' theory development in physical and simulated environments , 2006 .

[34]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The effect of computer simulations on introductory thermodynamics understanding , 1993 .

[35]  Jennifer Wilhelm,et al.  Pre-service mathematics teachers become full participants in inquiry investigations , 2006 .

[36]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[37]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving , 1992 .

[38]  T. Jong,et al.  Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: learning processes and instructional support , 1993 .

[39]  Eleni A. Kyza,et al.  The rationale, design, and implementation of a web-based inquiry learning environment , 2007 .

[40]  Barbara Wasson,et al.  Using scenarios to design complex technology-enhanced learning environments , 2012 .

[41]  Elwin R. Savelsbergh,et al.  The effect of external representation on constructing computer models of complex phenomena , 2003 .

[42]  Yiping Lou,et al.  Web-Based Learning , 2004 .

[43]  Allyson F. Hadwin,et al.  CoNoteS2: A Software Tool for Promoting Self-Regulation , 2001 .

[44]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  The Journal of the Learning Sciences: Effecting Changes in Education , 1991 .

[45]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  SEEK Web tutor: fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption , 2007 .

[46]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  Hypermedia design as learner scaffolding , 2008 .

[47]  David Klahr,et al.  Cognition and Instruction : Twenty-five Years of Progress , 2013 .

[48]  W. R. van Joolingen,et al.  SimQuest: authoring educational simulations. , 2003 .

[49]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Trends and issues of regulative support use during inquiry learning: Patterns from three studies , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The generality/specificity of expertise in scientific reasoning , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[52]  J. Kolodner,et al.  Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design , 2005 .

[53]  T. Jong,et al.  Measuring intuitive knowledge in science: The development of the what-if test , 1996 .

[54]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Use of Heuristics to Facilitate Scientific Discovery Learning in a Simulation Learning Environment in a Physics Domain , 2006 .

[55]  Susanne P. Lajoie,et al.  Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld , 2001 .

[56]  Sten R. Ludvigsen,et al.  Impacts and Characteristics of Computer-Based Science Inquiry Learning Environments for Precollege Students , 2014 .

[57]  David Hestenes,et al.  Cognitive process instruction , 1979 .

[58]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Information comparisons in example-based hypermedia environments: supporting learners with processing prompts and an interactive comparison tool , 2008 .

[59]  Ton de Jong,et al.  An extended dual search space model of scientific discovery learning , 1997 .

[60]  Susan Pedersen,et al.  Advancing young adolescents' hypothesis-development performance in a computer-supported and problem-based learning environment , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[61]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : theoretical perspectives , 2001 .

[62]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Processes of Scientific Discovery: The Strategy of Experimentation , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[63]  Carolyn W. Keys.  Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report , 2000 .

[64]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Not everybody needs help to seek help: Surprising effects of metacognitive instructions to foster help-seeking in an online-learning environment , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[65]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Mathematical Problem Solving , 1985 .

[66]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Support for Simulation-Based Learning: The Effect of Assignments in Learning about Transmission Lines , 1996, CALISCE.

[67]  Wouter van Joolingen,et al.  Developments in Inquiry Learning , 2009 .

[68]  James C. Lester,et al.  The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .

[69]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Supporting Learning of Variable Control in a Computer-Based Biology Environment: Effects of Prompting College Students to Reflect on Their Own Thinking , 1999 .

[70]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Learning Scientific Reasoning Skills in Microcomputer-Based Laboratories , 1990 .

[71]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Scientific Reasoning Across Different Domains , 1992 .

[72]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Effects of learning support in simulation-based physics learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[73]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[74]  David Klahr,et al.  Dual Space Search During Scientific Reasoning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[75]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Promoting Self-Directed Learning in Simulation-Based Discovery Learning Environments Through Intelligent Support , 2000, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[76]  Pat Langley,et al.  Data-Driven Discovery of Physical Laws , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[77]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Issues in computer supported inquiry learning in science , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[78]  Paul Mulholland,et al.  How technology resources can be used to represent personal inquiry and support students' understanding of it across contexts , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[79]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  An Investigation of Software Scaffolds Supporting Modeling Practices , 2002 .

[80]  Detlef Urhahne,et al.  How effective is instructional support for learning with computer simulations? , 2012, Instructional Science.

[81]  Ioannis Stamelos,et al.  The effect of scaffolding students' context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[82]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  The Practice of Inquiry: A Pedagogical ‘Sweet Spot’ for Digital Literacy? , 2012 .

[83]  D. Suthers,et al.  “Mapping to know”: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry , 2002 .

[84]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Enabling Students to Construct Theories of Collaborative Inquiry and Reflective Learning: Computer Support for Metacognitive Development , 1999 .

[85]  Brian Hand,et al.  Using a Science Writing Heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh‐grade science: quantitative and qualitative aspects , 2004 .

[86]  Andrew T. Lumpe,et al.  Student Use of Scaffolding Software: Relationships with Motivation and Conceptual Understanding , 2008 .

[87]  D. Klahr,et al.  Heuristics for Scientific Experimentation: A Developmental Study , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[88]  Barbara L. Grabowski,et al.  Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback , 2010 .

[89]  Elizabeth A. Davis,et al.  Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE , 2000 .

[90]  Koen Veermans,et al.  Intelligent support for discovery learning , 2003 .

[91]  Janine Swaak,et al.  Self-directed learning in simulation-based discovery environments , 1998, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[92]  Valerie J. Shute,et al.  A Large-Scale Evaluation of an Intelligent Discovery World: Smithtown , 1990, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[93]  G. Olympiou,et al.  Physical versus Virtual Manipulative Experimentation in Physics Learning. , 2011 .

[94]  Luigi Sarti,et al.  Design and production of multimedia and simulation-based learning material , 1994 .

[95]  Brian R. Belland,et al.  Toward a framework on how affordances and motives can drive different uses of scaffolds: theory, evidence, and design implications , 2013 .

[96]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Leveraging machine-learned detectors of systematic inquiry behavior to estimate and predict transfer of inquiry skill , 2011, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[97]  Jörg Zumbach,et al.  The role of graphical and text based argumentation tools in hypermedia learning , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[98]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .

[99]  Chris Quintana,et al.  Scaffolding strategies for supporting middle school students' online inquiry processes , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[100]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[101]  Christopher J. Harris,et al.  Simulations for STEM Learning : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Report Overview , 2013 .

[102]  Brian K. Smith,et al.  What should a wildebeest say? Interactive nature films for high school classrooms , 1997, MULTIMEDIA '97.

[103]  Jianwei Zhang,et al.  Triple scheme of learning support design for scientific discovery learning based on computer simulation: experimental research , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[104]  Shigenori Inagaki,et al.  Knowledge-building activity structures in Japanese elementary science pedagogy , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[105]  Derek C. Briggs,et al.  Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching , 2012 .

[106]  Vaughan Prain,et al.  Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science , 1999 .

[107]  Jan L. Plass,et al.  Multimedia Learning with Simulations and Microworlds , 2014 .

[108]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learning by self-explaining causal diagrams in high-school biology , 2012 .

[109]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  The impact of goal specificity and goal type on learning outcome and cognitive load , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[110]  B. Zimmerman.  Theories of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview and Analysis , 2001 .

[111]  Adrianus W. Lazonder,et al.  The guided discovery principle in multimedia learning. , 2005 .

[112]  Kent J. Crippen,et al.  The effects of feedback protocol on self-regulated learning in a web-based worked example learning environment , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[113]  Gard Ove Sørvik,et al.  Challenges and Support When Teaching Science Through an Integrated Inquiry and Literacy Approach , 2014 .

[114]  K. Scheiter,et al.  Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments , 2007 .

[115]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Exploring the fluctuation of motivation and use of self-regulatory processes during learning with hypermedia , 2008 .

[116]  John B. Black,et al.  The Development of Cognitive Skills To Support Inquiry Learning , 2000 .

[117]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Sharing and Confronting Propositions in Collaborative Inquiry Learning , 2009 .

[118]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. , 1989 .

[119]  Claudia Nerdel,et al.  The effects of instructional support and learner interests when learning using computer simulations , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[120]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? q , 2004 .

[121]  Kent J. Crippen,et al.  The impact of web-based worked examples and self-explanation on performance, problem solving, and self-efficacy , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[122]  Naomi J. Aldrich,et al.  Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning?. , 2011 .

[123]  Maiga Chang,et al.  Smart learning environments , 2015 .

[124]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials , 2006 .

[125]  Denis Gillet,et al.  Innovations in STEM education: the Go-Lab federation of online labs , 2014, Smart Learning Environments.

[126]  Ton de Jong,et al.  SMISLE : system for multimedia integrated simulation learning environments , 1993 .