In vivo real-time cavitation imaging in moving organs

The stochastic nature of cavitation implies visualization of the cavitation cloud in real-time and in a discriminative manner for the safe use of focused ultrasound therapy. This visualization is sometimes possible with standard echography, but it strongly depends on the quality of the scanner, and is hindered by difficulty in discriminating from highly reflecting tissue signals in different organs. A specific approach would then permit clear validation of the cavitation position and activity. Detecting signals from a specific source with high sensitivity is a major problem in ultrasound imaging. Based on plane or diverging wave sonications, ultrafast ultrasonic imaging dramatically increases temporal resolution, and the larger amount of acquired data permits increased sensitivity in Doppler imaging. Here, we investigate a spatiotemporal singular value decomposition of ultrafast radiofrequency data to discriminate bubble clouds from tissue based on their different spatiotemporal motion and echogenicity during histotripsy. We introduce an automation to determine the parameters of this filtering. This method clearly outperforms standard temporal filtering techniques with a bubble to tissue contrast of at least 20 dB in vitro in a moving phantom and in vivo in porcine liver.

[1]  C. Chin,et al.  Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Functional ultrasound imaging of intrinsic connectivity in the living rat brain with high spatiotemporal resolution , 2014, Nature Communications.

[3]  J M Rubin,et al.  Power Doppler US: a potentially useful alternative to mean frequency-based color Doppler US. , 1994, Radiology.

[4]  J Bercoff,et al.  Ultrafast compound doppler imaging: providing full blood flow characterization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  Zhen Xu,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound backscatter for pulsed cavitational ultrasound therapy-histotripsy , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  High-contrast ultrafast imaging of the heart , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[7]  Michael R. Bailey,et al.  Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy , 2005, Urological Research.

[8]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Ultrafast imaging in biomedical ultrasound , 2014 .

[9]  Lawrence A Crum,et al.  Acoustic characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound fields: a combined measurement and modeling approach. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Mingxi Wan,et al.  Spatial-temporal ultrasound imaging of residual cavitation bubbles around a fluid-tissue interface in histotripsy. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  M. Tanter,et al.  Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super-resolution vascular imaging , 2015, Nature.

[12]  Zhen Xu,et al.  Effects of acoustic parameters on bubble cloud dynamics in ultrasound tissue erosion (histotripsy). , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Lawrence A. Crum,et al.  Nucleation and stabilization of microbubbles in liquids , 1982 .

[14]  Mathieu Pernot,et al.  Combined passive detection and ultrafast active imaging of cavitation events induced by short pulses of high-intensity ultrasound , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[15]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Focal beam distortion and treatment planning in abdominal focused ultrasound surgery. , 2005 .

[16]  Miklós Gyöngy,et al.  Passive Spatial Mapping of Inertial Cavitation During HIFU Exposure , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Zhen Xu,et al.  Image-guided non-invasive ultrasound liver ablation using histotripsy: Feasibility study in an in vivo porcine model , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[18]  Charlie Demené,et al.  Spatiotemporal Clutter Filtering of Ultrafast Ultrasound Data Highly Increases Doppler and fUltrasound Sensitivity , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Zhen Xu,et al.  Therapeutic ultrasound to noninvasively create intracardiac communications in an intact animal model , 2011, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[20]  Zhen Xu,et al.  Size measurement of tissue debris particles generated from pulsed ultrasound cavitational therapy-histotripsy. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Imaging Tumor Angiogenesis With Contrast Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to &agr;v&bgr;3 , 2003 .

[22]  M. Fink,et al.  Functional ultrasound imaging of the brain , 2011, Nature Methods.

[23]  C. Cain,et al.  Controlled ultrasound tissue erosion , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[24]  Mathieu Pernot,et al.  Ultrafast Doppler Imaging of Blood Flow Dynamics in the Myocardium , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Lawrence A Crum,et al.  Effects of nonlinear propagation, cavitation, and boiling in lesion formation by high intensity focused ultrasound in a gel phantom. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Oleg A. Sapozhnikov,et al.  Twinkling artifact of Doppler imaging for cavitation detection during high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy: Sensitivity and resolution , 2013 .

[27]  Adam D. Maxwell,et al.  Boiling histotripsy: A noninvasive method for mechanical tissue disintegration , 2014 .