Conceptual Fingerprints: Lexical Decomposition by Means of Frames - a Neuro-cognitive Model

Frames, i.e., recursive attribute-value structures, are a general format for the decomposition of lexical concepts. Attributes assign unique values to objects and thus describe functional relations. Concepts can be classified into four groups: sortal, individual, relational and functional concepts. The classification is reflected by different grammatical roles of the corresponding nouns. The paper aims at a cognitively adequate decomposition, particularly, of sortal concepts by means of frames. Using typed feature structures, an explicit formalism for the characterization of cognitive frames is developed. The frame model can be extended to account for typicality effects. Applying the paradigm of object-related neural synchronization, furthermore, a biologically motivated model for the cortical implementation of frames is developed. Cortically distributed synchronization patterns may be regarded as the fingerprints of concepts.

[1]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age , 1991 .

[2]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations? , 1999, Neuron.

[3]  Markus Werning,et al.  The Neural Basis of the Object Concept in Ambiguous and Illusionary Perception , 2006 .

[4]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Concepts, attributes and arbitrary relations , 1992, Data Knowl. Eng..

[5]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Categories and concepts , 1984 .

[6]  Wiebke Petersen,et al.  Inheritance-based models of the lexicon , 2006 .

[7]  Markus Werning,et al.  THE CORTICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPLEX ATTRIBUTE AND SUBSTANCE CONCEPTS: SYNCHRONY, FRAMES, AND HIERARCHICAL BINDING , 2007 .

[8]  Christoph von der Malsburg,et al.  The Correlation Theory of Brain Function , 1994 .

[9]  Markus Werning,et al.  Ventral versus dorsal pathway: The source of the semantic object/event and the syntactic noun/verb distinction? , 2003, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[10]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[11]  M. Werning.  MARKUS WERNING THE TEMPORAL DIMENSION OF THOUGHT Cortical Foundations of Predicative Representation , 2005 .

[12]  W. Singer,et al.  Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties , 1989, Nature.

[13]  A. Treisman.  The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  Lawrence J. Mazlack,et al.  Frames, Coherency Chains and Hierarchical Binding: The Cortical Implementation of Complex Concepts , 2005 .

[15]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Thirty categorization results in search of a model. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Bob Carpenter,et al.  The logic of typed feature structures , 1992 .

[18]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  D. Bobrow,et al.  Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science , 1975 .

[20]  Dieter Wunderlich,et al.  Advances in the theory of the lexicon , 2006 .

[21]  Patrick Henry Winston,et al.  The psychology of computer vision , 1976, Pattern Recognit..

[22]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1998 .

[23]  Peter König,et al.  Binding by temporal structure in multiple feature domains of an oscillatory neuronal network , 1994, Biological Cybernetics.

[24]  Bucciarelli,et al.  Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2005 .

[25]  Alexander Maye,et al.  Temporal binding of non-uniform objects , 2004, Neurocomputing.

[26]  L. Barsalou.  Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields , 1992 .

[27]  William A. Woods,et al.  What's in a Link: Foundations for Semantic Networks , 1975 .