Galileo IOV RTK positioning: standalone and combined with GPS

Abstract Results are presented of real time kinematic (RTK) positioning based on carrier phase and code (pseudorange) observations of the four Galileo In-Orbit Validation (IOV) satellites, as they were in orbit and transmitting navigation data at the time of writing this article (2013). These Galileo data were collected by multi-GNSS receivers operated by Curtin University and as such this article is one of the first presenting results of short baseline ambiguity resolution and positioning based on Galileo IOV observations. The results demonstrate that integer ambiguity resolution based on the four IOV satellites needs fewer than three minutes when at least observables from three frequencies are used. Combined with data of four GPS satellites even instantaneous (single epoch) ambiguity resolution is demonstrated, using only two frequencies per constellation (i.e. E1+E5a & L1+L2). We also show that at locations with obstructed satellite visibility, such that positioning based on either GPS-only or Galileo-only becomes impossible or only in a very inaccurate way, combined Galileo&GPS positioning is feasible, within 10 min if one frequency of each constellation is used and only 2 min time-to-fix the ambiguities based on observations of two frequencies of each constellation. It is furthermore demonstrated that this results in positions with centimetre level accuracy in the horizontal plane and sub-decimetre accuracy in the vertical direction.

[1]  Blair Fonville,et al.  ACCOUNTING FOR TIMING BIASES BETWEEN GPS, MODERNIZED GPS, AND GALILEO SIGNALS , 2005 .

[2]  P. Teunissen,et al.  The ratio test for future GNSS ambiguity resolution , 2013, GPS Solutions.

[3]  Torben Schüler,et al.  Precise position determination using a Galileo E5 single-frequency receiver , 2013, GPS Solutions.

[4]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  First Demonstration of Galileo-Only Positioning , 2013 .

[5]  Bernhard Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  GNSS - Global Navigation Satellite Systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and more , 2007 .

[6]  Dennis Odijk,et al.  Performance improvement with low-cost multi-GNSS receivers , 2010, 2010 5th ESA Workshop on Satellite Navigation Technologies and European Workshop on GNSS Signals and Signal Processing (NAVITEC).

[7]  Andrew Simsky,et al.  Performance Assessment of Galileo Ranging Signals Transmitted by GSTB-V2 Satellites , 2006 .

[8]  Peter Teunissen.  A canonical theory for short GPS baselines. Part III: the geometry of the ambiguity search space , 1997 .

[9]  Xiao-Wen Chang,et al.  Code and carrier phase based short baseline GPS positioning: computational aspects , 2005 .

[10]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  GPS for geodesy , 1996 .

[11]  P. Teunissen.  A canonical theory for short GPS baselines. Part I: The baseline precision , 1997 .

[12]  E. Breeuwer,et al.  Galileo Orbit Selection , 2004 .

[13]  Peter Teunissen,et al.  Characterization of between-receiver GPS-Galileo inter-system biases and their effect on mixed ambiguity resolution , 2013, GPS Solutions.

[14]  Clyde C. Goad,et al.  On optimal filtering of GPS dual frequency observations without using orbit information , 1991 .

[15]  Oliver Montenbruck,et al.  Characterization of GPS/GIOVE sensor stations in the CONGO network , 2011 .

[16]  P. Teunissen.  The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation , 1995 .

[17]  L. L. Presti,et al.  First Joint GPS/IOV-PFM Galileo PVT estimation using carrier phase measurements , 2012 .

[18]  Peter Boiua,et al.  Precision, Cross Correlation, and Time Correlation of GPS Phase and Code Observations , 2000 .

[19]  Richard B. Langley,et al.  First Results: Precise Positioning with Galileo Prototype Satellites , 2012 .