Brainstem injury in motor vehicle crashes

ABSTRACT Objective: This is a descriptive study of the frequency and risk for brainstem injury by crash type, belt use, and crash severity (delta-V). NASS-CDS electronic cases were reviewed to see whether the transition from vehicles without advanced airbags and seat belts and side airbags and curtains to vehicles with the safety technologies has influenced the risk for brainstem injury. Methods: 1994–2013 NASS-CDS was analyzed to determine the number of brainstem injuries in nonejected adults (15+ years old) in vehicle crashes. Crashes were grouped by front, side, rear, and rollover. The effect of belt use was investigated. Light vehicles were included with model year (MY) 1994+. Occupants with severe head injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] 4+) and Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS) 4+F injury were also determined. The risk for injury with standard errors was determined using the MAIS 0+F exposure by belt use and crash type. NASS-CDS electronic cases were studied with brainstem injury in 2001–2013 MY vehicles. Results: NASS-CDS indicates there are 872 ± 133 cases of brainstem injury per year. About 16.0% of AIS 4+ head injury involves the brainstem. For belted occupants, the highest risk for brainstem injury was in side impacts at 0.065 ± 0.010%. In contrast, the highest risk for brainstem injury was 0.310 ± 0.291% in rear impacts and 0.310 ± 0.170% in rollovers for unbelted occupants. The risk for brainstem injury increased with crash severity. The highest risk for brainstem injury was 3.54 ± 1.45% in crashes with >72 km/h (>45 mph) delta-V. Exponential functions fit the change in risk with delta-V. Eighteen NASS-CDS electronic cases showed that brainstem injury occurred in very severe collisions where the occupant experienced multiple injuries from intrusion or impact on vehicle structures stiffened by deformation. Conclusions: The risk for brainstem injury in belted occupants has remained essentially constant over 20 years, whereas the risk for MAIS 4+F injury has declined 38.3%. The prevention of brainstem injuries must address the extreme speed of collisions and weight mismatches that overwhelm structures, seat belts, frontal airbags, side airbags, and curtains in modern vehicles.

[1]  David C. Viano,et al.  Fatalities by Seating Position and Principal Direction of Force (PDOF) for 1st, 2nd and 3rd Row Occupants , 2008 .

[2]  Mark Mynatt,et al.  A Study of the Factors Affecting Fatalities of Air Bag and Belt-Restrained Occupants in Frontal Crashes , 2009 .

[3]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Association of contact loading in diffuse axonal injuries from motor vehicle crashes. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  Aloke Prasad,et al.  NHTSA's Frontal Offset Research Program , 2004 .

[5]  Ulf Björnstig,et al.  Passenger car collision fatalities--with special emphasis on collisions with heavy vehicles. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  David C Viano,et al.  Difference in dummy responses in matched side impact tests of vehicles with and without side airbags , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[7]  Gerald McGwin,et al.  Association between side-impact airbag deployment and risk of injury: A matched cohort study using the CIREN and the NASS-CDS , 2012, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[8]  Mats O Lindquist,et al.  Kinematics of belted fatalities in frontal collisions: A new approach in deep studies of injury mechanisms. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  David C Viano,et al.  Effectiveness of the revision to FMVSS 301: FARS and NASS-CDS analysis of fatalities and severe injuries in rear impacts. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Andy Shea,et al.  Traffic Safety and the Driver , 1992 .

[11]  David C. Viano,et al.  Concussion, Diffuse Axonal Injury, and AIS4+ Head Injury in Motor Vehicle Crashes , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[12]  Ola Bostrom,et al.  Real-Life Fatal Outcome in Car-to-Car Near-Side Impacts—Implications for Improved Protection Considering Age and Crash Severity , 2009, Traffic injury prevention.

[13]  Etienne Javouhey,et al.  Incidence and risk factors of severe traumatic brain injury resulting from road accidents: a population-based study. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  F M Streff,et al.  IDENTIFYING UNSAFE DRIVER ACTIONS THAT LEAD TO FATAL CAR-TRUCK CRASHES , 2002 .

[15]  S. Newstead,et al.  Evaluation of vehicle side airbag effectiveness in Victoria, Australia. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  B. Fildes,et al.  Demographics, Velocity Distributions, and Impact Type as Predictors of AIS 4+ Head Injuries in Motor Vehicle Crashes. , 2011, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[17]  Michael B. James,et al.  Injury and Intrusion in Side Impacts and Rollovers , 1984 .

[18]  Ruth Welsh,et al.  Injury outcomes in side impacts involving modern passenger cars , 2007 .

[19]  Anders Lie,et al.  Census Study of Fatal Car-to-Car Intersection Crashes in Sweden Involving Modern Vehicles , 2011, Traffic injury prevention.

[20]  Thomas P Wenzel,et al.  The effects of vehicle model and driver behavior on risk. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Rodney W Rudd,et al.  Injury analysis of real-world small overlap and oblique frontal crashes , 2011 .

[22]  Anne T. McCartt,et al.  Efficacy of Side Airbags in Reducing Driver Deaths in Driver-Side Car and SUV Collisions , 2007, Traffic injury prevention.