US city size distribution: Robustly Pareto, but only in the tail

We establish empirically using three different definitions of US cities that the upper tail obeys a Pareto law and not a lognormal distribution. We emphasize estimation of a switching point between the body of the city size distribution (which includes most cities) and its upper tail (which includes most of the population). For the 2000 Census Places data, in particular, our preferred model suggests that switching from a lognormal to a Pareto law occurs within a narrow confidence interval around population 60,290, with a corresponding Pareto exponent of 1.25. Most cities obey a lognormal; but the upper tail and therefore most of the population obeys a Pareto law. We obtain qualitatively similar results for the upper tail with the Area Clusters data of Rozenfeld et al. (2011), and the US Census combined Metropolitan and Micropolitan Areas data, though the shape of that distribution at smaller sizes is sensitive to the definition used.

[1]  Yannick Malevergne,et al.  Testing the Pareto against the lognormal distributions with the uniformly most powerful unbiased test applied to the distribution of cities. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Wen-Tai Hsu,et al.  Central Place Theory and City Size Distribution , 2012 .

[3]  Hernán D. Rozenfeld,et al.  The Area and Population of Cities: New Insights from a Different Perspective on Cities , 2009, 1001.5289.

[4]  H. Simon,et al.  On Judging the Plausibility of Theories , 1977 .

[5]  J. Henderson,et al.  Medium size cities , 1997 .

[6]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Trade and Circuses : Explaining Urban Giants , 2007 .

[7]  Jan Eeckhout,et al.  Gibrat's Law for (All) Cities: Reply , 2009 .

[8]  J. Caers,et al.  Nonparametric tail estimation using a double bootstrap method , 1998 .

[9]  M. Handcock,et al.  Likelihood-based inference for stochastic models of sexual network formation. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[10]  J. Henderson.  The Sizes and Types of Cities , 1972 .

[11]  P. Krugman.  Confronting the Mystery of Urban Hierarchy , 1996 .

[12]  Kristian Giesen,et al.  The size distribution across all cities - Double Pareto lognormal strikes , 2010 .

[13]  Gilles Duranton,et al.  Urban Evolutions: The Fast, the Slow, and the Still , 2007 .

[14]  Esteban Rossi-Hansberg,et al.  The Effect of Information and Communication Technologies on Urban Structure , 2008, Economic Policy.

[15]  Yannis M. Ioannides,et al.  Dynamic Evolution of the U.S. City Size Distribution , 1999 .

[16]  B. Arnold,et al.  Bayesian Estimation and Prediction for Pareto Data , 1989 .

[17]  William J. Reed,et al.  The Double Pareto-Lognormal Distribution—A New Parametric Model for Size Distributions , 2004, WWW 2001.

[18]  Duncan Black,et al.  Urban evolution in the USA , 2003 .

[19]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[20]  Yannis M. Ioannides.  From Neighborhoods to Nations: The Economics of Social Interactions , 2012 .

[21]  X. Gabaix.  Zipf's Law for Cities: An Explanation , 1999 .

[22]  Yannis M. Ioannides,et al.  Spatial interactions among U.S. cities: 1900–1990 , 2001 .

[23]  J. Eeckhout.  Gibrat's Law for (All) Cities , 2004 .

[24]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[25]  S. Skouras.  Explaining Zipf's Law for US Cities , 2009 .

[26]  Moshe Levy,et al.  Gibrat's Law for (All) Cities: Comment , 2009 .

[27]  Donald Joseph Bogue,et al.  Population growth in standard metropolitan areas, 1900-1950 : with an explanatory analysis of urbanized areas , 1953 .

[28]  G. Duranton,et al.  From Sectoral to Functional Urban Specialisation , 2001 .

[29]  D. Andrews.  Testing When a Parameter Is on the Boundary of the Maintained Hypothesis , 2001 .

[30]  W. Reed,et al.  On the Rank-Size Distribution for Human Settlements , 2002 .

[31]  Gilles Duranton,et al.  From Sectoral to Functional Urban Specialization , 2001 .

[32]  Laurent Gobillon,et al.  In Economics and Social Sciences Working Papers Series the Productivity Advantages of Large Cities: Distinguishing Agglomeration from Firm Selection the Productivity Advantages of Large Cities: Distinguishing Agglomeration from Firm Selection , 2022 .