Integrating bioclimate with population models to improve forecasts of species extinctions under climate change

Climate change is already affecting species worldwide, yet existing methods of risk assessment have not considered interactions between demography and climate and their simultaneous effect on habitat distribution and population viability. To address this issue, an international workshop was held at the University of Adelaide in Australia, 25–29 May 2009, bringing leading species distribution and population modellers together with plant ecologists. Building on two previous workshops in the UK and Spain, the participants aimed to develop methodological standards and case studies for integrating bioclimatic and metapopulation models, to provide more realistic forecasts of population change, habitat fragmentation and extinction risk under climate change. The discussions and case studies focused on several challenges, including spatial and temporal scale contingencies, choice of predictive climate, land use, soil type and topographic variables, procedures for ensemble forecasting of both global climate and bioclimate models and developing demographic structures that are realistic and species-specific and yet allow generalizations of traits that make species vulnerable to climate change. The goal is to provide general guidelines for assessing the Red-List status of large numbers of species potentially at risk, owing to the interactions of climate change with other threats such as habitat destruction, overexploitation and invasive species.

[1]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[2]  T. Dawson,et al.  Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data , 2004 .

[3]  Corey J A Bradshaw,et al.  Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Use and misuse of the IUCN Red List Criteria in projecting climate change impacts on biodiversity , 2006 .

[5]  Donald A. Dinero Use and Misuse , 2011 .

[6]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models , 2008, Biology Letters.

[7]  M. Araújo,et al.  Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling , 2006 .

[8]  M. A. O'connell,et al.  Demography of woody plants in relation to fire: Banksia ericifolia L.f. and Petrophile pulchella (Schrad) R.Br. , 1988 .

[9]  Damien A. Fordham,et al.  Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  E J Milner-Gulland,et al.  Quantification of Extinction Risk: IUCN's System for Classifying Threatened Species , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[11]  Hong S. He,et al.  Integrating Landscape and Metapopulation Modeling Approaches: Viability of the Sharp‐Tailed Grouse in a Dynamic Landscape , 2004 .

[12]  Mark New,et al.  Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.