Visual information feedback mechanism and attitudinal prioritisation method for group decision making with triangular fuzzy complementary preference relations

Abstract A visual information feedback mechanism for group decision making (GDM) problems with triangular fuzzy complementary preference relations (TFCPRs) is investigated. The concepts of similarity degree (SD) between two experts as well as the proximity degree (PD) between an expert and the rest of experts in the group are developed for TFCPRs. The consensus level (CL) is defined by combining SD and PD, and a feedback mechanism is proposed to identify experts, alternatives and corresponding preference values that contribute less to consensus. The novelty of this feedback mechanism is that it will provide each expert with visual representations of his/her consensus status to easily ‘see’ his/her consensus position within the group as well as to identify the alternatives and preference values that he/she should be reconsidered for changing in the subsequent consensus round. The feedback mechanism also includes individualised recommendation to those identified experts on changing their identified preference values and visual graphical simulation of future consensus status if the recommended values were to be implemented. Based on the continuous ordered weighted average (COWA) operator, the triangular fuzzy COWA (TF-COWA) operator is defined, and a novel attitudinal expected score function for TFCPRs is developed. The advantage of this function is that the alternatives are ranked by taking into account the attitudinal character of the group of experts or its moderator if applicable. Additionally, a ranking sensitivity analysis of the attitudinal expected score function with respect to the attitudinal parameter is provided.

[1]  Metin Dağdeviren,et al.  Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[2]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Yejun Xu,et al.  The ordinal consistency of a fuzzy preference relation , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[4]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Group Decision-Making Model With Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations Based on Additive Consistency , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[5]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Decision support systems and intelligent systems , 1997 .

[6]  Zhibin Wu,et al.  A consistency and consensus based decision support model for group decision making with multiplicative preference relations , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[7]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[8]  Qing-wei Cao,et al.  An ILOWG operator based group decision making method and its application to evaluate the supplier criteria , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[9]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Methods for fuzzy complementary preference relations based on multiplicative consistency , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[10]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  An Adaptive Consensus Support Model for Group Decision-Making Problems in a Multigranular Fuzzy Linguistic Context , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[11]  T. Tanino Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making , 1984 .

[12]  Elena Deza,et al.  Encyclopedia of Distances , 2014 .

[13]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[15]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making With Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[16]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A C‐OWA operator‐based approach to decision making with interval fuzzy preference relation , 2006, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[17]  Beyza Ahlatçioglu Ozkok,et al.  Fuzzy portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[18]  P. Fishburn The Theory Of Social Choice , 1973 .

[19]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Group decision making based on multiple types of linguistic preference relations , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[20]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[21]  Ami Arbel,et al.  Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation , 1989 .

[22]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A web based consensus support system for group decision making problems and incomplete preferences , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[23]  Shanlin Yang,et al.  The group consensus based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributive group decision analysis , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Francisco Chiclana,et al.  Non-dominance and attitudinal prioritisation methods for intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[25]  Robert Ivor John,et al.  The sampling method of defuzzification for type-2 fuzzy sets: Experimental evaluation , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[26]  Petr Ekel,et al.  A flexible consensus scheme for multicriteria group decision making under linguistic assessments , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[27]  F. Herrera,et al.  A consistency-based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values , 2008 .

[28]  Jian Ma,et al.  A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations , 2006, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[29]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  The continuous ordered weighted geometric operator and its application to decision making , 2006, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[30]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Interval multiplicative transitivity for consistency, missing values and priority weights of interval fuzzy preference relations , 2010, Inf. Sci..

[31]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: Extensions, applications and challenges , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[32]  Fang Liu,et al.  A goal programming model for incomplete interval multiplicative preference relations and its application in group decision-making , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Autocratic Decision Making Using Group Recommendations Based on the ILLOWA Operator and Likelihood-Based Comparison Relations , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[34]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[36]  G. Marakas Decision Support Systems in the 21st Century , 1998 .

[37]  Qing-wei Cao,et al.  Some issues on properties of the extended IOWA operators in fuzzy group decision making , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[38]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[39]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[40]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[41]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A linear goal programming priority method for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its applications in new product screening , 2008, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[42]  Peter C. Fishburn,et al.  Utility theory for decision making , 1970 .

[43]  Slawomir Zadrozny,et al.  How to Support Consensus Reaching Using Action Rules: a Novel Approach , 2010, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[44]  Z. Xu,et al.  On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[46]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A consistency‐based procedure to estimate missing pairwise preference values , 2008, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[47]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - II , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[48]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words , 2000, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[49]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Group consensus algorithms based on preference relations , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[50]  Patrik Eklund,et al.  A consensus model of political decision-making , 2008, Ann. Oper. Res..

[51]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[52]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[53]  Ido Millet,et al.  The Effectiveness of Alternative Preference Elicitation Methods in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1997 .

[54]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  OWA aggregation over a continuous interval argument with applications to decision making , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[55]  Yueh-Hsiang Chen,et al.  Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[56]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  A two-stage logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[57]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A survey of preference relations , 2007, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[58]  Zhibin Wu,et al.  A concise consensus support model for group decision making with reciprocal preference relations based on deviation measures , 2012, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[59]  Zhou-Jing Wang,et al.  Goal programming approaches to deriving interval weights based on interval fuzzy preference relations , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[60]  Yin-Feng Xu,et al.  The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[61]  Fang Liu,et al.  A new method of obtaining the priority weights from an interval fuzzy preference relation , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[62]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Computing with words in decision making: foundations, trends and prospects , 2009, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[63]  David Ben-Arieh,et al.  Linguistic-labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision making using group recommendations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[64]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Cardinal Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Characterization of Multiplicative Transitivity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[65]  N. Bryson Group decision-making and the analytic hierarchy process: exploring the consensus-relevant information content , 1996 .

[66]  Qing-wei Cao,et al.  Some properties of the induced continuous ordered weighted geometric operators in group decision making , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[67]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A Learning Procedure to Estimate Missing Values in Fuzzy Preference Relations Based on Additive Consistency , 2004, MDAI.

[68]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  Group Consensus Function Estimation When Preferences are Uncertain , 1986, Oper. Res..

[69]  Zeshui Xu Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making , 2005 .

[70]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority , 1992 .

[71]  Yang Liu,et al.  An Approach to Solve Group-Decision-Making Problems With Ordinal Interval Numbers , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[72]  Robert Ivor John,et al.  The collapsing method of defuzzification for discretised interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[73]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[74]  Rami Zwick,et al.  Measures of similarity among fuzzy concepts: A comparative analysis , 1987, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[75]  Michele Fedrizzi,et al.  Incomplete pairwise comparison and consistency optimization , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[76]  Hui Li,et al.  The induced continuous ordered weighted geometric operators and their application in group decision making , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[77]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[78]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  Consensus Building in AHP-Group Decision Making: A Bayesian Approach , 2010, Oper. Res..

[79]  Humberto Bustince,et al.  Entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and on interval-valued fuzzy sets , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..