Image matching based local Delaunay triangulation and affine invariant geometric constraint

Abstract Finding correspondences between two sets of visual features of 2D image is a key problem in computer vision tasks. In practice situation, objects often undergo occlusion, background clutter, illumination and 3D viewpoint changes which increase the difficulties of matching, thus a robust matching method is needed to tackle with these problems. In this paper, we propose a robust approach to image matching based on Hessian affine region detector and local Delaunay triangulation and affine invariant geometric constraint. Firstly, Hessian affine keypoints with Scale Invariant Feature Transform(SIFT) descriptors are extracted for model and scene image, then matching the Hessian affine keypoints to get initial matched keypoints based on Euclidean distance of their (SIFT) descriptors. Third, Delaunay triangulation of the initial matched Hessian affine keypoints. Based on unique topological structure of Delaunay triangulation of a set of keypoints, we divide the keypoints into two classes, one class with the same number of neighbor triangles, the other class with different number of neighbor triangles, from the two classes of keypoints, we obtained matched triangles by local Delaunay triangulation. There are may have wrong matched triangles, we adopt local affine invariant geometric constraint to refine the matched triangles. Finally, get the final matched keypoints from the refined matched triangles. By using three pairs of images, the experimental results indicate that the proposed method can get higher correctness of image matching than RANSAC based method.

[1]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[2]  Martial Hebert,et al.  A spectral technique for correspondence problems using pairwise constraints , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[3]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Localizing Overlapping Parts by Searching the Interpretation Tree , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Efficient representation of local geometry for large scale object retrieval , 2009, CVPR.

[5]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  Efficient image matching with distributions of local invariant features , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[7]  Jean-Daniel Boissonnat,et al.  Complexity of the delaunay triangulation of points on surfaces the smooth case , 2003, SCG '03.

[8]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Evaluation of Interest Point Detectors , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[9]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Shape matching and object recognition using low distortion correspondences , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[10]  David S. Doermann,et al.  Robust point matching for nonrigid shapes by preserving local neighborhood structures , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Wide baseline stereo matching , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[12]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  A Comparison of Affine Region Detectors , 2005, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Feature Detection with Automatic Scale Selection , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[14]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Beyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[15]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Local Grayvalue Invariants for Image Retrieval , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  David P. Dobkin,et al.  The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls , 1996, TOMS.

[17]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Scale & Affine Invariant Interest Point Detectors , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.