The role of verbal behavior in human learning: II. Developmental differences.

When children in four different age ranges operated a response device, reinforcers were presented according to fixed-interval schedules ranging in value from 10 to 70 seconds. Only the behavior of the subjects in the youngest of the four groups, the preverbal infants, resembled that of other animal species. The children in age ranges 5 to 6(1/2) and 7(1/2) to 9 years exhibited either the low-rate or high-rate response patterns typical of human adults. Those who showed the low-rate pattern reported a time-based formulation of the contingencies and some of them were observed to occasionally count out the interval before responding. The performance of children aged 2(1/2) to 4 years differed from that of both infants and older children, though containing some patterning elements similar to those produced by the older and younger subjects. The predominant response pattern of the infants consisted of a pause after reinforcement followed by an accelerated rate of responding that terminated when the next reinforcer was delivered. Analysis of postreinforcement-pause duration and response rate showed that infant performance, but not that of the older children, consistently exhibited the same kinds of schedule sensitivity observed in animal behavior. The evidence supports the suggestion that the development of verbal behavior greatly alters human operant performance and may account for many of the differences found between human and animal learning.

[1]  A. Decasper,et al.  Steady-State Behavior in Children: A Method and Some Data. , 1972 .

[2]  B. Skinner,et al.  The operational analysis of psychological terms , 1945, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[3]  L. Lippman,et al.  Fixed interval performance as related to instructions and to subjects’ verbalizations of the contingency , 1967 .

[4]  S. Hanson,et al.  Measurement and modeling of behavior under fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1981 .

[5]  L. Lippman,et al.  Fixed Interval Performance as Related to Subjects’ Verbalizations of the Reinforcement Contingency , 1968 .

[6]  H M HANSON,et al.  FI length and performance of an FI FR chain schedule of reinforcement. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  B C Starr,et al.  Temporal control of periodic schedules: signal properties of reinforcement and blackout. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  P B Dews,et al.  Studies on responding under fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement: II. The scalloped pattern of the cumulative record. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  S. Bem Verbal self-control: the establishment of effective self-instruction. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  V G Laties,et al.  Effects of a concurrent task on fixed-interval responding in humans. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  Behaviorism at fifty. , 1963 .

[12]  M Perone,et al.  The Place of the Human Subject in the Operant Laboratory , 1982, The Behavior analyst.

[13]  K. O'Leary,et al.  Developing Correspondence between Children's Words and Deeds. , 1973 .

[14]  H Weiner,et al.  Controlling human fixed-interval performance. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  Michael D. Zeiler,et al.  Fixed-ratio and fixed-interval schedules of cartoon presentation , 1969 .

[16]  Mark Galizio,et al.  Instructional control of human operant behavior. , 1983 .

[17]  C F Lowe,et al.  The role of verbal behavior in human learning: infant performance on fixed-interval schedules. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[18]  M. Branch,et al.  Where Have All the Behaviorists Gone? , 1980, The Behavior analyst.

[19]  C. Lowe,et al.  The flight from human behavior , 1984, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  B J Campbell,et al.  Intermittent reinforcement of operant behavior in children. , 1958, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[21]  B. A. Matthews,et al.  Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[22]  D. Baer,et al.  The Analysis of Correspondence Training as a Chain Reinforceable at Any Point. , 1982 .

[23]  B. A. Matthews,et al.  Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[24]  C. Lowe,et al.  Determinants of Operant Behaviour in Humans: Some Differences from Animals , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  C. Lowe,et al.  Species differences in temporal control of behavior. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[26]  C. Lowe,et al.  Temporal control of behavior and the power law. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[27]  C. Lowe,et al.  Is All Behaviour Modification ‘Cognitive’? , 1983 .

[28]  C F Lowe,et al.  Species differences in temporal control of behavior II: human performance. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[29]  M. Wilson,et al.  Periodic reinforcement interval and number of periodic reinforcements as parameters of response strength. , 1954, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.