Microscale air quality impacts of distributed power generation facilities

ABSTRACT The electric system is experiencing rapid growth in the adoption of a mix of distributed renewable and fossil fuel sources, along with increasing amounts of off-grid generation. New operational regimes may have unforeseen consequences for air quality. A three-dimensional microscale chemical transport model (CTM) driven by an urban wind model was used to assess gaseous air pollutant and particulate matter (PM) impacts within ~10 km of fossil-fueled distributed power generation (DG) facilities during the early afternoon of a typical summer day in Houston, TX. Three types of DG scenarios were considered in the presence of motor vehicle emissions and a realistic urban canopy: (1) a 25-MW natural gas turbine operating at steady state in either simple cycle or combined heating and power (CHP) mode; (2) a 25-MW simple cycle gas turbine undergoing a cold startup with either moderate or enhanced formaldehyde emissions; and (3) a data center generating 10 MW of emergency power with either diesel or natural gas-fired backup generators (BUGs) without pollution controls. Simulations of criteria pollutants (NO2, CO, O3, PM) and the toxic pollutant, formaldehyde (HCHO), were conducted assuming a 2-hr operational time period. In all cases, NOx titration dominated ozone production near the source. The turbine scenarios did not result in ambient concentration enhancements significantly exceeding 1 ppbv for gaseous pollutants or over 1 µg/m3 for PM after 2 hr of emission, assuming realistic plume rise. In the case of the datacenter with diesel BUGs, ambient NO2 concentrations were enhanced by 10–50 ppbv within 2 km downwind of the source, while maximum PM impacts in the immediate vicinity of the datacenter were less than 5 µg/m3. Implications: Plausible scenarios of distributed fossil generation consistent with the electricity grid’s transformation to a more flexible and modernized system suggest that a substantial amount of deployment would be required to significantly affect air quality on a localized scale. In particular, natural gas turbines typically used in distributed generation may have minor effects. Large banks of diesel backup generators such as those used by data centers, on the other hand, may require pollution controls or conversion to natural gas-fired reciprocal internal combustion engines to decrease nitrogen dioxide pollution.

[1]  Abigail S. Hoats,et al.  Intake fraction assessment of the air pollutant exposure implications of a shift toward distributed electricity generation , 2006 .

[2]  Eduardo P Olaguer,et al.  The potential near-source ozone impacts of upstream oil and gas industry emissions , 2012, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  G. Briggs,et al.  A Plume Rise Model Compared with Observations , 1965 .

[4]  Norbert Kalthoff,et al.  Measured and simulated vertical profiles of nitrous acid—Part I: Field measurements , 2003 .

[5]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Data center demand response: avoiding the coincident peak via workload shifting and local generation , 2013, SIGMETRICS '13.

[6]  Balwinder Singh,et al.  Evaluation of the QUIC-URB fast response urban wind model for a cubical building array and wide building street canyon , 2008 .

[7]  Jan F. Kreider,et al.  Distributed Generation : The Power Paradigm for the New Millennium , 2001 .

[8]  Jacob Brouwer,et al.  Future Impacts of Distributed Power Generation on Ambient Ozone and Particulate Matter Concentrations in the San Joaquin Valley of California , 2011, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  Scott C. Herndon,et al.  Attribution of primary formaldehyde and sulfur dioxide at Texas City during SHARP/formaldehyde and olefins from large industrial releases (FLAIR) using an adjoint chemistry transport model , 2013 .

[10]  S. I. Freedman,et al.  Gas-Fired Distributed Energy Resource Technology Characterizations , 2003 .

[11]  Eduardo P Olaguer,et al.  Near-source air quality impacts of large olefin flares , 2012, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[12]  Christine Wiedinmyer,et al.  Emissions of volatile organic compounds inferred from airborne flux measurements over a megacity , 2008 .

[13]  Juliann Emmons Allison,et al.  Encouraging distributed generation of power that improves air quality: can we have our cake and eat it too? , 2002 .

[14]  J. A. de Gouw,et al.  Determination of urban volatile organic compound emission ratios and comparison with an emissions database , 2007 .

[15]  W. Brune,et al.  A comparison of chemical mechanisms based on TRAMP-2006 field data , 2010 .

[16]  Zheming Tong,et al.  The near-source impacts of diesel backup generators in urban environments , 2015 .

[17]  Thomas M. Holsen,et al.  Dry Deposition Velocities as a Function of Particle Size in the Ambient Atmosphere , 1994 .

[18]  B. Rappenglück,et al.  Radical precursors and related species from traffic as observed and modeled at an urban highway junction , 2013, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[19]  Akula Venkatram,et al.  The relative impacts of distributed and centralized generation of electricity on local air quality in the South Coast Air Basin of California , 2011 .

[20]  Lisa Fasano Bay Area Air Quality Management District statement regarding Chevron Refinery project , 2011 .

[21]  Eduardo P. Olaguer,et al.  Application of an adjoint neighborhood‐scale chemistry transport model to the attribution of primary formaldehyde at Lynchburg Ferry during TexAQS II , 2013 .

[22]  Eladio Knipping,et al.  Air Quality Impacts of Distributed Energy Resources Implemented in the Northeastern United States , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.