Effects of varied-stimulus exposure training on fear reduction and return of fear.

The current investigation assessed the relative treatment benefits of persistence with one specific stimulus vs exposure to multiple versions of a stimulus. The study was a 2 (type of stimulus) x 3 (assessment occasion) design, in which two spider-fearful groups (N = 28) were compared across three different occasions: pre-treatment, post-treatment, and follow-up. Exposure trials were conducted with the same tarantula for participants in the control group, whereas experimental participants were exposed to four novel tarantulas. As predicted, the control group demonstrated significantly more habituation than the experimental group across exposure trials, yet showed a clear return of fear in response to a control spider at a 3-week follow-up assessment whereas the experimental group showed no increase in fear. These findings offer support for the beneficial effects of varying the stimulus during exposure, and challenge the reliance on indices of fear activation and habituation as accurate signals of the permanence of fear reduction.

[1]  F. Watts,et al.  Questionnaire dimensions of spider phobia. , 1984, Behaviour research and therapy.

[2]  R. Bjork.  Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. , 1994 .

[3]  S. Rachman.  The return of fear: Review and prospect , 1989 .

[4]  H. Philips.  Return of fear in the treatment of a fear of vomiting. , 1985, Behaviour research and therapy.

[5]  M. Craske,et al.  Return of fear: perceived skill and heart-rate responsivity. , 1987, The British journal of clinical psychology.

[6]  S. Rachman,et al.  Synchronous and desynchronous changes during fear reduction. , 1979, Behaviour research and therapy.

[7]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Metacognition : knowing about knowing , 1994 .

[8]  S. Rachman.  The return of fear. , 1979, Behaviour research and therapy.

[9]  Mark E. Bouton,et al.  Sources of relapse after extinction in Pavlovian and instrumental learning , 1991 .

[10]  M. Bouton,et al.  Context and ambiguity in the extinction of emotional learning: implications for exposure therapy. , 1988, Behaviour research and therapy.

[11]  R. Hodgson,et al.  I. Synchrony and desynchrony in fear and avoidance. , 1974, Behaviour research and therapy.

[12]  R. Schmidt,et al.  New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training , 1992 .

[13]  T. Borkovec.  The role of expectancy and physiological feedback in fear research: A review with special reference to subject characteristics , 1973 .

[14]  T. Borkovec.  Heart-rate process during systematic desensitization and implosive therapy for analog anxiety. , 1974 .

[15]  J. S. Jameson,et al.  Massed vs. spaced exposure sessions in the treatment of agoraphobia. , 1980, Behaviour research and therapy.

[16]  M. Kozak,et al.  Emotional processing of fear: exposure to corrective information. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Dc Washington.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed. , 1994 .

[18]  S. Rachman,et al.  Return of fear: the role of inhibition. , 1981, Behaviour research and therapy.

[19]  S. Rachman,et al.  Return of fear: the role of rehearsal. , 1982, Behaviour research and therapy.

[20]  D. Chambless,et al.  Spacing of exposure sessions in treatment of agoraphobia and simple phobia , 1990 .

[21]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation , 1992 .

[22]  S. Williams,et al.  Generalization of therapeutic changes in agoraphobia: the role of perceived self-efficacy. , 1989, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[23]  W. Garlington,et al.  The generalization of anxiety reduction following systematic desensitization of snake anxiety. , 1969, Behaviour research and therapy.

[24]  P. Dua.  Group Desensitization of a Phobia with Three Massing Procedures. , 1972 .