Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Comparison of two different diffusion weighted (DW) sequences in breast MRI regarding the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Breast MRI including two different DW sequences was performed in 165 consecutive women. Inclusion criteria for DW imaging and ADC evaluation were histologically proven focal mass lesions with a diameter of more than 5 mm in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. The DW sequences were pre-contrast echo-planar imaging with spectral fat saturation (EPI fs) and DW EPI with inversion recovery (EPI STIR) (b-values: 50, 400, and 800). Lesions were analyzed regarding visibility in DW sequences and ADC values. RESULTS Inclusion criteria were fulfilled in 56 women with 69 lesions. Five lesions could not be evaluated for different reasons. Finally, DW sequences were evaluated in 51 women with 64 focal mass lesions (15 benign, 49 malignant). The visibility of the lesions was significantly better in the EPI fs sequence (P<0.05). The ADC values (10(-3) mm(2)/s) in the EPI fs were 1.76, 2.58, and 1.21 (mean, maximum, minimum, respectively) for benign lesions and 0.90, 1.19, and 0.34 for malignant lesions. Respective values in the EPI STIR sequence were 1.92, 3.20, 1.10, and 0.91, 1.43, 0.35. Only in the EPI fs sequence there was no overlap in ADC values between benign and malignant lesions. CONCLUSION The DW MRI of the breast with EPI fs and EPI STIR sequences has a high potential to differentiate between benign and malignant breast lesions. Due to better lesion visibility and selectivity, the EPI fs sequence should be preferred.

[1]  E Grabbe,et al.  Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. , 1999, Radiology.

[2]  Ning-Yu An,et al.  Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion‐weighted imaging , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  Usha Sinha,et al.  In vivo diffusion‐weighted MRI of the breast: Potential for lesion characterization , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Do T2‐weighted pulse sequences help with the differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions in dynamic breast MRI? , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  N. Obuchowski,et al.  Assessment of suspected breast cancer by MRI: a prospective clinical trial using a combined kinetic and morphologic analysis. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Euan A Ashley,et al.  Does Size Matter?: Clinical Applications of Scaling Cardiac Size and Function for Body Size , 2008, Circulation.

[7]  E A Sickles,et al.  Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Shigeru Nawano,et al.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value. , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[10]  U. Fischer,et al.  International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions , 2001, European Radiology.

[11]  Ruediger Schulz-Wendtland,et al.  Mamma-Sonographie mit 7,5 MHz versus 13 MHz: Ist eine Verbesserung der diagnostischen Sicherheit im Rahmen der komplementären Mammadiagnostik möglich? , 2005 .

[12]  N. Hylton,et al.  Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. , 2006, Radiology.

[13]  Jürgen Gieseke,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: initial experience. , 2006, Radiology.

[14]  Masanori Ozaki,et al.  ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors. , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[15]  Katarzyna J Macura,et al.  Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[16]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[17]  Shiro Sugihara,et al.  MR imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Peter Aspelin,et al.  Dynamic MR Imaging Of The Breast , 2003 .

[19]  Thierry Metens,et al.  Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: A clinical prospective study , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  N. Hylton,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. , 2004, JAMA.

[21]  Isabelle Bedrosian,et al.  Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Cancer.

[22]  P. Lai,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI features of brain abscess and cystic or necrotic brain tumors: comparison with conventional MRI. , 2002, Clinical imaging.

[23]  B. Szabó,et al.  Dynamic MR imaging of the breast: Analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria , 2003, Acta radiologica.

[24]  G. Schuierer,et al.  Diffusion‐Weighted Echo‐Planar MRI of the Brain with Calculated ADCs: A Useful Tool in the Differential Diagnosis of Tumor Necrosis from Abscess? , 2003, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[25]  M D Schnall,et al.  Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. , 2001, Radiology.

[26]  L. Liberman,et al.  Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  Elizabeth A Morris,et al.  Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  W A Kaiser [Magnetic resonance tomography of the breast. The results of 253 examinations]. , 1989, Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift.