On-Line Dynamic Process Monitoring Using Wavelet-Based Generic Dissimilarity Measure

In this paper an extension to previous research into dynamic process performance monitoring using the generic dissimilarity measure (GDM) is described. The proposed method, wavelet-based GDM, combines the ability of wavelets to extract deterministic features and approximately decorrelate autocorrelated process data with that of the GDM. The GDM realizes the monitoring of changes in the time series distribution of the process data with the degree of dissimilarity defining the monitoring metric. The objective of the wavelet aspect of the analysis is to approximate the true process characteristics and to address the correlation structure present in the data whilst the GDM is the basis of the process performance monitoring step that is implemented using a moving window approach. A comprehensive analysis of data simulated from the Tennessee Eastman process indicates that the proposed method is effective in detecting process changes and faults of various magnitudes with little or no time delay. Furthermore a comparative study with three other methods, standard PCA, dynamic PCA and multiscale PCA, shows that the proposed approach exhibits superior performance in terms of false alarm rate and time to fault detection.

[1]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis , 1995 .

[2]  Manabu Kano,et al.  Comparison of statistical process monitoring methods: application to the Eastman challenge problem , 2000 .

[3]  Elaine B. Martin,et al.  The statistical monitoring of a complex manufacturing process , 2001 .

[4]  A. J. Morris,et al.  Multivariate statistical process control of an industrial fluidised-bed reactor , 2000 .

[5]  Theodora Kourti,et al.  Multivariate SPC Methods for Process and Product Monitoring , 1996 .

[6]  D. Donoho,et al.  Translation-Invariant De-Noising , 1995 .

[7]  Ravi Mazumdar,et al.  Wavelet representations of stochastic processes and multiresolution stochastic models , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[8]  C K Yoo,et al.  Disturbance detection and isolation in the activated sludge process. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  B. Bakshi Multiscale PCA with application to multivariate statistical process monitoring , 1998 .

[10]  A. J. Morris,et al.  Confidence limits for contribution plots , 2000 .

[11]  David M. Himmelblau,et al.  Sensor Fault Detection via Multiscale Analysis and Dynamic PCA , 1999 .

[12]  Xiuxi Li,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic principal component analysis for on-line process monitoring and diagnosis , 2000 .

[13]  Barry M. Wise,et al.  The process chemometrics approach to process monitoring and fault detection , 1995 .

[14]  M. P. Callao,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Process Control Applied to SulfateDetermination by Sequential Injection Analysis , 1997 .

[15]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  Ten Lectures on Wavelets , 1992 .

[16]  Kevin Amaratunga,et al.  Fast estimation of continuous Karhunen-Loeve eigenfunctions using wavelets , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[17]  A. J. Morris,et al.  Manufacturing Performance Monitoring of a Mixed Batch Continuous Process through Resampling , 2002 .

[18]  Gang Chen,et al.  Predictive on-line monitoring of continuous processes , 1998 .

[19]  E. F. Vogel,et al.  A plant-wide industrial process control problem , 1993 .

[20]  A. J. Morris,et al.  Monitoring of a Batch Continuous Process Using Mass Re-Sampling , 2002 .