Detection of pulmonary nodules by multislice computed tomography: improved detection rate with reduced slice thickness

The purpose of this study was to find out if the use of 1.25-mm collimated thin-slice technique helps to detect more small pulmonary lung nodules than the use of 5 mm. A total of 100 patient examinations that allowed a reconstruction of 1.25-mm slice thickness in addition to the standard of 5-mm slices were included in a prospective study. Acquisition technique included four rows of 1-mm slices. Two sets of contiguous images were reconstructed and compared with 1.25- and 5-mm slice thickness, respectively. Two radiologists performed a film-based analysis of the images. The size and the confidence of the seen nodules were reported. We did not perform a histological verification, according to the normal clinical procedure, although it would be optimal regarding research. Statistical analysis was performed by using longitudinal analysis described by Brunner and Langer [10]. In addition, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value were calculated for each reader using the 1.25-mm sections as the gold standard. As an index for concordance the kappa value was used. A value of p<0.05 was regarded as significant. In 37 patients pulmonary nodules were detected. Twenty-four patients showed more than one nodule; among these, 7 patients had disseminated disease and were excluded from the study. Pulmonary nodules larger than 10 mm in size were equally well depicted with both modalities, whereas lesions smaller than 5 mm in size were significantly better depicted with 1.25 mm (p<0.05). Using 1.25 mm as the gold standard, sensitivity for 5-mm reconstruction interval was 88 and 86% for observers A and B, respectively. No false-positive results were reported for 5-mm sections. Interobserver agreement for nodule detection determined for 1.25-mm reconstruction intervals showed a k value of 0.753, indicating a good agreement, and 0.562 for 5-mm reconstruction intervals, indicating a moderate agreement. Brunner and Langer [10] analysis showed significant differences for slice thickness and no significant difference between the observers. Reduced slice thickness demonstrated an improvement of small nodule detection, confidence levels, and interobserver agreement. Application of thin-slice multidetector-row CT may raise the sensitivity for lung nodule detection, although the higher detection rate of smaller nodules has to be evaluated from a clinical perspective and remains problematic about how the detection of small nodules will effect patient outcome.

[1]  E G Theros,et al.  1976 Caldwell Lecture: varying manifestation of peripheral pulmonary neoplasms: a radiologic-pathologic correlative study. , 1977, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  P. Sheedy,et al.  Comparison of whole lung tomography and computed tomography for detecting pulmonary nodules. , 1978, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  D Blume,et al.  Pulmonary nodule: evaluation with spiral volumetric CT. , 1991, Radiology.

[4]  S. D. Davis,et al.  CT evaluation for pulmonary metastases in patients with extrathoracic malignancy. , 1991, Radiology.

[5]  R. Greene Missed lung nodules: lost opportunities for cancer cure. , 1992, Radiology.

[6]  J. Gurney Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part I. Theory. , 1993, Radiology.

[7]  J. Gurney,et al.  Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part II. Application. , 1993, Radiology.

[8]  J. Remy,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: detection with thick-section spiral CT versus conventional CT. , 1993, Radiology.

[9]  C J Bergin,et al.  Spiral CT of the lungs: optimal technique and resolution compared with conventional CT. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  A. Wright,et al.  Comparison of spiral-acquisition computed tomography and conventional computed tomography in the assessment of pulmonary metastatic disease. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  J. Austin,et al.  Glossary of terms for CT of the lungs: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. , 1996, Radiology.

[12]  M. Cohen,et al.  Maximum intensity projection images in the detection of simulated pulmonary nodules by spiral CT. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  Edgar Brunner,et al.  Nichtparametrische Analyse longitudinaler Daten , 1998 .

[14]  Taylor Murray,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1999 , 1999, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[15]  H. Scheld,et al.  Helical CT of pulmonary nodules in patients with extrathoracic malignancy: CT-surgical correlation. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  W D Foley,et al.  Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. , 2000, Radiology.

[17]  W. Heindel,et al.  Spiral CT of pulmonary nodules: interobserver variation in assessment of lesion size , 2000, European Radiology.

[18]  C. Henschke Early lung cancer action project , 2000, Cancer.

[19]  M Oudkerk,et al.  Lung cancer screening by low-dose spiral computed tomography. , 2001, The European respiratory journal.

[20]  Karin A. Herrmann,et al.  Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT der Lunge: Multiplanare Rekonstruktionen und Maximum-Intensitäts-Projektionen in der Detektion von Lungenrundherden , 2001 .

[21]  Nancy A. Obuchowski,et al.  Multi-slice computed tomography as a screening tool for colon cancer, lung cancer and coronary artery disease , 2001, European Radiology.

[22]  M. Reiser,et al.  [Multidetector-row CT of the lungs: Multiplanar reconstructions and maximum intensity projections for the detection of pulmonary nodules]. , 2001, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[23]  Stefan Tigges,et al.  Incremental benefit of maximum-intensity-projection images on observer detection of small pulmonary nodules revealed by multidetector CT. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  W. Heindel,et al.  Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral CT: prevalence in 817 asymptomatic smokers. , 2002, Radiology.