Influence of the positioning error on 3D conformal dose distributions during fractionated radiotherapy.

The influence of patient immobilization error on 3D planned conformal radiation therapy in tumors of the thorax and pelvis was studied. The mean positioning error in 43 patients with carcinomas of the thorax and pelvis undergoing 3D conformal radiotherapy (laser supported alignment, no immobilization device) was measured. A total of 194 portal films were superposed with the corresponding simulator radiographs according to anatomic landmarks and using a subtrascope. x-, y- and z-axis deviation was determined within a coordinate system. Using specialized software including Fourier transformation the mean positioning error was employed to recalculate the dose distributions of all cases under the influence of random (Gaussian) immobilization uncertainty. The mean two-dimensional positioning error using the data from all patients was 5.5 (+/- 3.7) mm. The distribution was Gaussian. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) of each patient with and without consideration of positioning uncertainty were compared on the base of tumor control probability estimations (TCP) using published DVH reduction and TCP algorithms. Inclusion of the positioning error resulted in a mean decrease in TCP (given as the difference between the TCP assuming no positioning error and the TCP modified by the positioning error) of 2% in a series of esophagus carcinomas and of 5% in the prostate carcinomas when looking at gross tumor volume (GTV), only. Planning target volume (PTV) exhibited a relative decrease in TCP of 5% and 11%, respectively.

[1]  A G Visser,et al.  Accuracy in radiation field alignment in head and neck cancer: a prospective study. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  Kenneth G. A. Gilhuijs,et al.  Role of electronic portal imaging in high dose/high precision radiotherapy , 1993 .

[3]  M Goitein,et al.  Strategies for treating possible tumor extension: some theoretical considerations. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  R. Pearcey,et al.  Quality control in radiotherapy: the reduction of field placement errors. , 1987, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  P. Dunscombe,et al.  Sizes and sources of field placement error in routine irradiation for prostate cancer. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  D Low,et al.  An evaluation of two methods of anatomical alignment of radiotherapy portal images. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  J Bijhold,et al.  Maximizing setup accuracy using portal images as applied to a conformal boost technique for prostatic cancer. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  A Bel,et al.  Time trend of patient setup deviations during pelvic irradiation using electronic portal imaging. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  M. Wannenmacher,et al.  Integration of coronal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) into radiation treatment planning of mediastinal tumors. , 1993, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al].

[10]  G H Hartmann,et al.  THREE DIMENSIONAL DOSE PLANNING USING TOMOGRAPHIC DATA. , 1984 .

[11]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Can modest escalations of dose be detected as increased tumor control? , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  E van der Schueren,et al.  Quality assessment of medical decision making in radiation oncology: variability in target volume delineation for brain tumours. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  A Brahme,et al.  Dosimetric precision requirements in radiation therapy. , 1984, Acta radiologica. Oncology.

[14]  J. Gérard High dose-high precision in radiation oncology. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  M. Goitein,et al.  Accuracy of radiation field alignment in clinical practice. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Wolfgang Schlegel,et al.  DREIDIMENSIONALE BESTRAHLUNGSPLANUNG. UNTERSUCHUNGEN ZUR KLINISCHEN INTEGRATION , 1993 .

[17]  M Wannenmacher,et al.  Fractionated stereotactically guided radiotherapy of head and neck tumors: a report on clinical use of a new system in 195 cases. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  A R Smith,et al.  Improved methods for determination of variability in patient positioning for radiation therapy using simulation and serial portal film measurements. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  T LoSasso,et al.  The use of a multi-leaf collimator for conformal radiotherapy of carcinomas of the prostate and nasopharynx. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  J. Moore,et al.  Dose-incidence curves for tumour control and normal tissue injury, in relation to the response of clonogenic cells. , 1983, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  G E Hanks,et al.  Conformal static field therapy for low volume low grade prostate cancer with rigid immobilization. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.