Multi-site harmonization of diffusion MRI data in a registration framework

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) data acquired on different scanners varies significantly in its content throughout the brain even if the acquisition parameters are nearly identical. Thus, proper harmonization of such data sets is necessary to increase the sample size and thereby the statistical power of neuroimaging studies. In this paper, we present a novel approach to harmonize dMRI data (the raw signal, instead of dMRI derived measures such as fractional anisotropy) using rotation invariant spherical harmonic (RISH) features embedded within a multi-modal image registration framework. All dMRI data sets from all sites are registered to a common template and voxel-wise differences in RISH features between sites at a group level are used to harmonize the signal in a subject-specific manner. We validate our method on diffusion data acquired from seven different sites (two GE, three Philips, and two Siemens scanners) on a group of age-matched healthy subjects. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method by statistically comparing diffusion measures such as fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity and generalized fractional anisotropy across these sites before and after data harmonization. Validation was also done on a group oftest subjects, which were not used to “learn” the harmonization parameters. We also show results using TBSS before and after harmonization for independent validation of the proposed methodology. Using synthetic data, we show that any abnormality in diffusion measures due to disease is preserved during the harmonization process. Our experimental results demonstrate that, for nearly identical acquisition protocol across sites, scanner-specific differences in the signal can be removed using the proposed method in a model independent manner.

[1]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Multi-site study of additive genetic effects on fractional anisotropy of cerebral white matter: Comparing meta and megaanalytical approaches for data pooling , 2014, NeuroImage.

[2]  R. Deriche,et al.  Regularized, fast, and robust analytical Q‐ball imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Vijay K. Venkatraman,et al.  Region of interest correction factors improve reliability of diffusion imaging measures within and across scanners and field strengths , 2015, NeuroImage.

[4]  Joy T. Matsui,et al.  Development of image processing tools and procedures for analyzing multi-site longitudinal diffusion-weighted imaging studies , 2014 .

[5]  Richard Frayne,et al.  Reliability of neuroanatomical measurements in a multisite longitudinal study of youth at risk for psychosis , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[6]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  MultiCenter Reliability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging , 2012, Brain Connect..

[7]  Kilian M. Pohl,et al.  Harmonizing DTI measurements across scanners to examine the development of white matter microstructure in 803 adolescents of the NCANDA study , 2016, NeuroImage.

[8]  Peter Savadjiev,et al.  Harmonizing Diffusion MRI Data Across Multiple Sites and Scanners , 2015, MICCAI.

[9]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Multi-site genetic analysis of diffusion images and voxelwise heritability analysis: A pilot project of the ENIGMA–DTI working group , 2013, NeuroImage.

[10]  Peter Savadjiev,et al.  Inter-site and inter-scanner diffusion MRI data harmonization , 2016, NeuroImage.

[11]  Yang Yang,et al.  Advanced Normalization Tools for Cardiac Motion Correction , 2014, STACOM.

[12]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Image-based vs. Coordinate-based Meta-analysis , 2009, NeuroImage.

[13]  Theo G. M. van Erp,et al.  Reliability of functional magnetic resonance imaging activation during working memory in a multi-site study: Analysis from the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study , 2014, NeuroImage.

[14]  Baba C. Vemuri,et al.  Resolution of complex tissue microarchitecture using the diffusion orientation transform (DOT) , 2006, NeuroImage.

[15]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Corrigendum to “Multi-site genetic analysis of diffusion images and voxelwise heritability analysis: A pilot project of the ENIGMA–DTI working group” [NeuroImage 81 (2013) 455–469] , 2014, NeuroImage.

[16]  Wei Huang,et al.  Demonstration of nonlinearity bias in the measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in multicenter trials , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution , 2007, NeuroImage.

[18]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Tract-based spatial statistics: Voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[19]  Mauro Iori,et al.  MR Scanner Systems Should Be Adequately Characterized in Diffusion-MRI of the Breast , 2014, PloS one.