Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones?

The paper contributes to our understanding of the nature and impact of green technological change. We focus on the search and impact spaces of green inventions, scrutinising the knowledge recombination processes leading to the generation of the invention and the impact of the invention on subsequent technological developments. Using a large sample of patents filed during 1980-2012, we analyse a set of established patent indicators that capture different aspects of the invention process. Technological heterogeneity is controlled for by comparing green and non-green technologies within similar narrow technological domains. Green technologies are found to be more complex and radical than non-green ones and to have a larger and more pervasive impact on subsequent inventions. However, the results show a variety of distinctive patterns with respect to the knowledge dimension considered. We derive some important policy implications.

[1]  R. Grandinetti,et al.  Does the development of environmental innovation require different resources? Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms , 2015 .

[2]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Where does energy R&D come from? Examining crowding out from energy R&D , 2012 .

[3]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Technological Breakthroughs: An analysis of US State-Level Patenting , 2015 .

[4]  Gavin J. Wright An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[5]  Muge Ozman,et al.  Technological pervasiveness and variety of innovators in Green ICT: A patent-based analysis , 2014 .

[6]  Hélène Dernis,et al.  Triadic Patent Families Methodology , 2004 .

[7]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[8]  Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli,et al.  Investigating the antecedents of general purpose technologies , 2016 .

[9]  Nicolò Barbieri,et al.  Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones? , 2020 .

[10]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Stelios Kafandaris,et al.  Problem Solving: A Statistician's Guide , 1996 .

[12]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[13]  Nicolò Barbieri,et al.  A Survey of the Literature on Environmental Innovation Based on Main Path Analysis , 2016 .

[14]  Gianluca Carnabuci,et al.  Where do firms' recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms' ability to innovate through technological recombination , 2013 .

[15]  K. Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth , 2007 .

[16]  Z. Griliches The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[17]  Yeonbae Kim,et al.  Measuring relatedness between technological fields , 2010, Scientometrics.

[18]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  Research Commentary - Too Big to Fail: Large Samples and the p-Value Problem , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Oksana Mont,et al.  Clarifying the Concept of Product-Service System , 2002 .

[20]  B. Looy,et al.  Co-Ownership of Intellectual Property: Exploring the Value-Appropriation and Value-Creation Implications of Co-Patenting with Different Partners , 2013 .

[21]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2001 .

[22]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[23]  Sigvald Harryson,et al.  Transformation Networks in Innovation Alliances the Development of Volvo C70 , 2008 .

[24]  P. Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment , 2005 .

[25]  Totti Könnölä,et al.  Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies , 2010 .

[26]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[27]  D. Rodrik Green industrial policy , 2014 .

[28]  Ram Mudambi,et al.  Knowing when to leap: Transitioning between exploitative and explorative R&D , 2014 .

[29]  Martin Andersson,et al.  Which types of relatedness matter in regional growth? Industry, occupation and education , 2017 .

[30]  Nicolò Barbieri,et al.  The division of labour between academia and industry for the generation of radical inventions , 2018, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[31]  Davide Consoli,et al.  Do Green Jobs Differ from Non-Green Jobs in Terms of Skills and Human Capital? , 2015 .

[32]  P. Aghion,et al.  The Environment and Directed Technical Change , 2009, The American economic review.

[33]  V. Marchi ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND R&D COOPERATION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SPANISH MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 2012 .

[34]  F. Malerba,et al.  Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification , 2003 .

[35]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value , 2006 .

[36]  Edlyn S. Simmons,et al.  “Black sheep” in the patent family , 2009 .

[37]  Antoine Dechezleprêtre,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers from Clean and Dirty Technologies , 2014 .

[38]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Technological Change and the Environment , 2000 .

[39]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Interactive overlay maps for US patent (USPTO) data based on International Patent Classification (IPC) , 2012, Scientometrics.

[40]  Richard Florida,et al.  Lean and Green: The Move to Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing , 1996 .

[41]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[42]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[43]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[44]  Carlota Perez,et al.  11. Capitalism, Technology and a Green Global Golden Age: The Role of History in Helping to Shape the Future , 2015 .

[45]  Z. Griliches HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[46]  Hariolf Grupp The concept of entropy in scientometrics and innovation research , 2005, Scientometrics.

[47]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[48]  J. Lerner The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[49]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[50]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[51]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[52]  B. Nooteboom Institutions and Forms of Co-ordination in Innovation Systems , 2000 .

[53]  L. Gagliardi,et al.  The greener the better? Job creation effects of environmentally-friendly technological change , 2016 .

[54]  James Joyce,et al.  Perspectives on technology , 1977, Medical History.

[55]  David Popp,et al.  Innovation in climate policy models: Implementing lessons from the economics of R&D , 2006 .

[56]  John Metcalfe,et al.  Evolutionary Economics and Technology Policy , 1994 .

[57]  Daniele Rotolo,et al.  Emerging Technology , 2001 .

[58]  Kristina Dahlin,et al.  When is an Invention Really Radical? Defining and Measuring Technological Radicalness , 2005 .

[59]  J. Hagedoorn Sharing intellectual property rights - an exploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies. , 2003 .

[60]  M. Lange,et al.  Patent indicators for the technology life cycle development , 2007 .

[61]  J. Schumpeter The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[62]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  The team scaling fallacy: Underestimating the declining efficiency of larger teams , 2012 .

[63]  U. Cantner,et al.  Pervasive technologies and industrial linkages: Modeling acquired purposes , 2017 .

[64]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[65]  Ivan Haščič,et al.  Measuring environmental innovation using patent data , 2015 .

[66]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[67]  Vanessa Oltra,et al.  Determinants and Specificities of Eco-innovations – An Econometric Analysis for the French and German Industry based on the Community Innovation Survey , 2009 .

[68]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  A Time to Sow and a Time to Reap: Growth Based on General Purpose Technologies , 1994 .

[69]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Measuring intersectoral technology spillovers estimates from the European and US patent office databases , 1997 .

[70]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[71]  Peter J. G. Pearson,et al.  A low carbon industrial revolution? Insights and challenges from past technological and economic transformations , 2012 .

[72]  M. Weitzman,et al.  Recombinant Growth , 2009 .

[73]  Deepak Hegde,et al.  Highly innovative small firms in the markets for technology , 2005 .

[74]  Harry Rothman,et al.  An experiment in science mapping for research planning , 1986 .

[75]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .

[76]  Sandro Montresor,et al.  Forms of knowledge and eco-innovation modes: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms , 2017 .

[77]  Massimiliano Mazzanti,et al.  Diversely moving towards a green economy: Techno-organisational decarbonisation trajectories and environmental policy in EU sectors , 2017 .

[78]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[79]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[80]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Innovation and Diffusion of Clean/Green Technology: Can Patent Commons Help? , 2011 .

[81]  G. Duysters,et al.  The technological origins of radical inventions , 2010 .

[82]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Measuring Technological Novelty with Patent-Based Indicators , 2015 .

[83]  F. Montobbio,et al.  Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations , 2009 .

[84]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[85]  Vanessa Oltra,et al.  The dynamics of environmental innovations: three stylised trajectories of clean technology , 2005 .

[86]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[87]  Sandro Montresor,et al.  The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries , 2015 .