Fairness and accountability of AI in disaster risk management: Opportunities and challenges

Summary Disaster risk management (DRM) seeks to help societies prepare for, mitigate, or recover from the adverse impacts of disasters and climate change. Core to DRM are disaster risk models that rely heavily on geospatial data about the natural and built environments. Developers are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence (AI) to improve the quality of these models. Yet, there is still little understanding of how the extent of hidden geospatial biases affects disaster risk models and how accountability relationships are affected by these emerging actors and methods. In many cases, there is also a disconnect between the algorithm designers and the communities where the research is conducted or algorithms are implemented. This perspective highlights emerging concerns about the use of AI in DRM. We discuss potential concerns and illustrate what must be considered from a data science, ethical, and social perspective to ensure the responsible usage of AI in this field.

[1]  Julia Rubin,et al.  Fairness Definitions Explained , 2018, 2018 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Software Fairness (FairWare).

[2]  A. Mostafavi,et al.  Revealing Unfairness in social media contributors’ attention to vulnerable urban areas during disasters , 2021 .

[3]  Tim Miller,et al.  Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences , 2017, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Cletus T. Andoh.  Bioethics and the Challenges to Its Growth in Africa , 2011 .

[5]  Chris Russell,et al.  Explaining Explanations in AI , 2018, FAT.

[6]  Daniel E. Acuna,et al.  Are AI Ethics Conferences Different and More Diverse Compared to Traditional Computer Science Conferences? , 2021, AIES.

[7]  Sekou Remy,et al.  Narratives and Counternarratives on Data Sharing in Africa , 2021, FAccT.

[8]  Paula Lucci,et al.  Are we underestimating urban poverty , 2018 .

[9]  R. Muir-Wood,et al.  Climate change: New dimensions in disaster risk, exposure, vulnerability, and resilience , 2012 .

[10]  G. Kemper,et al.  SENSOR FUSION, GIS AND AI TECHNOLOGIES FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT , 2020 .

[11]  M. de Wit,et al.  From “Communicating” to “Engagement”: Afro-Relationality as a Conceptual Framework for Climate Change Communication in Africa , 2020 .

[12]  Andrew D. Selbst,et al.  Big Data's Disparate Impact , 2016 .

[13]  J. Dramsch,et al.  70 years of machine learning in geoscience in review , 2020, Advances in Geophysics.

[14]  Benjamin Rosman,et al.  Applying a principle of explicability to AI research in Africa: should we do it? , 2020, Ethics and Information Technology.

[15]  J. Sarmiento,et al.  Establishing public accountability, speaking truth to power and inducing political will for disaster risk reduction: ‘Ocho Rios + 25’ , 2011 .

[16]  Madhulika Srikumar,et al.  Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[17]  Kristin Bergtora Sandvik,et al.  Do no harm: A taxonomy of the challenges of humanitarian experimentation , 2017, International Review of the Red Cross.

[18]  Dennis Wagenaar,et al.  Invited perspectives: How machine learning will change flood risk and impact assessment , 2020 .

[19]  George Vosselman,et al.  Evaluating the Societal Impact of Using Drones to Support Urban Upgrading Projects , 2018, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[20]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems , 2019, FAT.

[21]  S. Hellsten.  Global bioethics: utopia or reality? , 2008, Developing world bioethics.

[22]  Suresh Venkatasubramanian,et al.  A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learning , 2018, FAT.

[23]  Godwin Yeboah,et al.  "Domains of deprivation framework" for mapping slums, informal settlements, and other deprived areas in LMICs to improve urban planning and policy: A scoping review , 2021, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[24]  Francesca Rossi,et al.  AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations , 2018, Minds and Machines.

[25]  Antonio. Donini.  Humanitarian ethics. A guide to the morality of aid in war and disaster , 2016 .

[26]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores , 2016, ITCS.

[27]  Y. Georgiadou,et al.  The Changing Face of Accountability in Humanitarianism: Using Artificial Intelligence for Anticipatory Action , 2020 .

[28]  Shivam Behl,et al.  Twitter for disaster relief through sentiment analysis for COVID-19 and natural hazard crises , 2021, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[29]  E. Zagheni,et al.  The ABCDE of Big Data: Assessing Biases in Call-Detail Records for Development Estimates , 2019, The World Bank Economic Review.

[30]  Tony Doyle,et al.  Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy , 2017, Inf. Soc..

[31]  F. Chukwuneke,et al.  Global Bioethics and Culture in a Pluralistic World: How does Culture influence Bioethics in Africa? , 2014, Annals of medical and health sciences research.

[32]  S. West.  Redistribution and Rekognition , 2020 .

[33]  Norman Kerle,et al.  Remote Sensing-Based Proxies for Urban Disaster Risk Management and Resilience: A Review , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[34]  A. Zipf,et al.  The evolution of humanitarian mapping within the OpenStreetMap community , 2021, Scientific reports.

[35]  K. Moodley.  Microbicide research in developing countries: have we given the ethical concerns due consideration? , 2007, BMC medical ethics.

[36]  Robert Soden,et al.  Machine Learning for Disaster Risk Management , 2019 .

[37]  Harris Mateen.  Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy , 2018 .

[38]  Manzhu Yu,et al.  Big Data in Natural Disaster Management: A Review , 2018 .

[39]  Maranke Wieringa,et al.  What to account for when accounting for algorithms: a systematic literature review on algorithmic accountability , 2020, FAT*.

[40]  Harini Suresh,et al.  A Framework for Understanding Unintended Consequences of Machine Learning , 2019, ArXiv.

[41]  Israel R. Orimoloye,et al.  Systematic mapping of disaster risk management research and the role of innovative technology , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[42]  Miranda Fricker,et al.  Epistemic justice as a condition of political freedom? , 2012, Synthese.

[43]  Safiya Noble,et al.  Algorithms of Oppression , 2018 .

[44]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis , 1995 .