Weighted Dissociated Dipoles: An Extended Visual Feature Set

The complexity of any learning task depends on the learning method as on finding a good data representation. In the concrete case of object recognition in computer vision, the representation of the images is one of the most important decisions in the design step. As a starting point, in this work we use the representation based on Haar-like filters, a biological inspired feature set based on local intensity differences, which has been successfully applied to different object recognition tasks, such as pedestrian or face recognition problems. From this commonly used representation, we jump to the dissociated dipoles, another biological plausible representation which also includes non-local comparisons. After analyzing the benefits of both representations, we present a more general representation which brings together all the good properties of Haar-like and dissociated dipoles representations. Since these feature sets cannot be used with the classical Adaboost approach due computational limitations, an evolutionary learning algorithm is used to test them over different state of the art object recognition problems. Besides, an extended statistically study of these results is performed in order to verify the relevance of these huge feature spaces.

[1]  P. Sinha,et al.  Dissociated Dipoles: Image Representation via Non-local Comparisons , 2003 .

[2]  Steve McLaughlin,et al.  Comparative study of textural analysis techniques to characterise tissue from intravascular ultrasound , 1996, Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[3]  Jordi Vitrià,et al.  Fast Traffic Sign Detection on greyscale images , 2004 .

[4]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Object Classification Using a Fragment-Based Representation , 2000, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[5]  Rainer Lienhart,et al.  An extended set of Haar-like features for rapid object detection , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[6]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Qualitative Representations for Recognition , 2002, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[7]  R. Iman,et al.  Approximations of the critical region of the fbietkan statistic , 1980 .

[8]  Fabrizio Smeraldi Ranklets: orientation selective non-parametric features applied to face detection , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[9]  Janez Demsar,et al.  Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[10]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[11]  Jordi Vitrià,et al.  Real-time object detection using an evolutionary boosting strategy , 2006, CCIA.

[12]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.