An evaluation of animated demonstrations of learning computer-based tasks

Animated demonstrations are real-time instantiation of computer-based procedures. They appear to be a natural way of helping people learn direct manipulation interfaces, yet we know little about their efficacy. Carefully matched animated demonstrations, procedural textual instructions, and a combination of demonstrations and spoken text were compared. The demonstration groups were faster and more accurate when learning procedural tasks, but seven days later the text group was faster and as accurate when performing identical and similar tasks. Apparently, the processing of animated demonstrations may not be sufficient for retention and transfer of interface procedures. Even with accompanying text provided, the simplicity of using demonstrations may encourage mimicry and disregard of text.

[1]  Stephen M. Casner,et al.  ANALYSIS-BASED LEARNING IN HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION , 1987 .

[2]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive principles in the design of computer tutors , 1984 .

[3]  Philip J. Barnard,et al.  Paragraphs of Pictographs: The Use of Non-verbal Instructions for Equipment , 1979 .

[4]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Learning to use word processors: problems and prospects , 1983, TOIS.

[5]  David E. Kieras,et al.  The Acquisition and Performance of Text-Editing Skill: A Cognitive Complexity Analysis , 1990, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  A. Ehrenfeucht,et al.  Encoding and retaining information in the visuals and verbals of an educational movie , 1983 .

[7]  Noi Sukaviriya Dynamic construction of animated help from application context , 1988, UIST '88.

[8]  P Wright,et al.  "The instructions clearly state ..." Can't people read? , 1981, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  K. P. Szlichcinski,et al.  Diagrams and illustrations as aids to problem solving , 1979 .

[10]  D. Stone,et al.  How Do Young Adults Read Directions with and without Pictures , 1981 .

[11]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Exploring Exploring a Word Processor , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming Languages , 1983, Computer.

[13]  Susan Palmiter,et al.  Animated Demonstrations vs Written Instructions for Learning Procedural Tasks: A Preliminary Investigation , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[14]  Dan R. Olsen,et al.  Help by guided tasks: utilizing UIMS knowledge , 1990, CHI '90.

[15]  Myron W. Krueger,et al.  Automated Explanations as a Component of a Computer-Aided Design System , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  Patricia Baggett Structurally equivalent stories in movie and text and the effect of the medium on recall. , 1979 .

[17]  Harold R. Booher Relative Comprehensibility of Pictorial Information and Printed Words in Proceduralized Instructions , 1975 .

[18]  David E. Kieras,et al.  Toward a Model of Acquiring Procedures from Text , 1989 .

[19]  Patricia Baggett Role of Temporal Overlap of Visual and Auditory Material in Forming Dual Media Associations. , 1984 .

[20]  Daniel E. Neiman,et al.  Graphical Animation From Knowledge , 1982, AAAI.

[21]  M. Just,et al.  The psychology of reading and language comprehension , 1986 .

[22]  Patricia Baggett,et al.  Role of temporal overlap of visual and auditory material in forming dual media associations. , 1984 .

[23]  Richard Hodgkinson,et al.  Developing wordless instructions: A case history , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.