Creating environments for innovation: Designing and implementing advanced experimental network research testbeds based on the Global Lambda Integrated Facility and the StarLight Exchange

Large scale national and international experimental research environments are required to advance communication services and supporting network architecture, technology, and infrastructure. Theories and concepts are often explored using simulation and modeling techniques within labs or on small scale testbeds. However, while such testbeds are valuable resources for the research process, these facilities alone cannot provide an appropriate approximation of the real world conditions required to explore ideas at scale. Very large scale global, experimental network research capabilities are required to deeply investigate innovative concepts. For many years, network testbeds were created to address fairly specific, well defined, limited research goals, and they were implemented for fairly short periods. Recently, taking advantage of a number of macro information technology trends, such as virtualization and programmable resources, several network research communities have been developing innovative types of network research environments. Instead of designing traditional network testbeds, research communities are designing large scale, highly flexible distributed platforms that can be used to create many different types of testbeds. Also, rather than creating short term testbeds for limited research objectives, these new environments are being designed as long term persistent resources to support many types of experimental research. This paper describes the motivations for this trend, provides several examples of large scale distributed network research environments based on the Global Lambda Integrated Facility (GLIF) and the StarLight Exchange Facility, including the Global Environment for Network Innovation (GENI), and indicates emerging future trends for these types of environments.

[1]  Admela Jukan,et al.  Evolution of Optical Networking Toward Rich Digital Media Services , 2012, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[2]  Nick McKeown,et al.  OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks , 2008, CCRV.

[3]  Chase Qishi Wu,et al.  Ultrascience net: network testbed for large-scale science applications , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  Guido Appenzeller,et al.  Maturing of OpenFlow and Software-defined Networking through deployments , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[5]  Xi Wang,et al.  Wide-Area experiments with LambdaStream over dedicated high-bandwidth networks , 2006 .

[6]  Phuoc Tran-Gia,et al.  Future Internet research and experimentation: The G-Lab approach , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[7]  Robert L. Grossman,et al.  The Open Cloud Testbed: A Wide Area Testbed for Cloud Computing Utilizing High Performance Network Services , 2009, ArXiv.

[8]  Joe Mambretti Designing 21st Century Communications: Architecture, Services, Technology, and Facilities , 2009, GridNets.

[9]  Cees T. A. M. de Laat,et al.  Special section: OptIPlanet - The OptIPuter global collaboratory , 2009, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[10]  Tiejun J. Xia,et al.  Flexible architectures for optical transport nodes and networks , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Didier Colle,et al.  Design and implementation of the OFELIA FP7 facility: The European OpenFlow testbed , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[12]  E. D. Giorgi Selected Papers , 2006 .

[13]  Jing Wu,et al.  A grid oriented lightpath provisioning system , 2004, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference Workshops, 2004. GlobeCom Workshops 2004..

[15]  Mon-Yen Luo,et al.  Openflow services for science: an international experimental research network demonstrating multi-domain automatic network topology discovery, direct dynamic path provisioning using edge signaling and control, integration with multipathing using MPTCP , 2012, 2012 SC Companion: High Performance Computing, Networking Storage and Analysis.

[16]  Joe Mambretti OptIPuter: Enabling advanced applications with novel optical control planes and backplanes , 2009, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[17]  Joe Mambretti,et al.  Multipathing with MPTCP and OpenFlow , 2012, 2012 SC Companion: High Performance Computing, Networking Storage and Analysis.

[18]  Mauro Campanella,et al.  The FEDERICA infrastructure and experience , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[19]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[20]  Chu-Sing Yang,et al.  Design and Implementation of an Automatic Network Topology Discovery System for the Future Internet Across Different Domains , 2012, 2012 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.

[21]  Michael Stanton RNP Experiences and Expectations in Future Internet Research and Development , 2010 .

[22]  Gicheol Wang,et al.  K-GENI testbed deployment and federated meta operations experiment over GENI and KREONET , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[23]  Akihiro Nakao,et al.  GENI: A federated testbed for innovative network experiments , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[24]  S. Figuerola,et al.  Infrastructure Services for Optical Networks [Invited] , 2009, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[25]  Fei Yeh,et al.  Distributed optical testbed (DOT): a grid applications and optical communications testbed , 2005, 2nd International Conference on Broadband Networks, 2005..

[26]  Cees T. A. M. de Laat,et al.  TransLight: a global-scale LambdaGrid for e-science , 2003, CACM.

[27]  Jeremy Weinberger,et al.  Optical dynamic intelligent network services (ODIN): an experimental control-plane architecture for high-performance distributed environments based on dynamic lightpath provisioning , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[28]  Michel Savoie,et al.  High Performance Digital Media Network (HPDMnet): An advanced international research initiative and global experimental testbed , 2011, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[29]  Gabriel Junyent,et al.  Extending the UCLP software with a Dynamic Optical Multicast Service to support high performance digital media , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling.

[30]  Robert Ricci,et al.  The InstaGENI initiative: An architecture for distributed systems and advanced programmable networks , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[31]  Thomas A. DeFanti,et al.  StarLight: Next-Generation Communication Services, Exchanges, and Global Facilities , 2010, Adv. Comput..

[32]  Michel Savoie,et al.  Layer 1 virtual private network management by users , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[33]  Robert L. Grossman,et al.  An overview of the Open Science Data Cloud , 2010, HPDC '10.

[34]  Masahiko Jinno,et al.  G-lambda and EnLIGHTened: wrapped in middleware co-allocating compute and network resources across Japan and the US , 2007, GridNets '07.

[35]  Phil DeMar,et al.  A collaborative network middleware project by Lambda Station, TeraPaths, and Phoebus , 2010 .

[36]  F. Travostino,et al.  DWDM-RAM: an architecture for data intensive services enabled by next generation dynamic optical networks , 2004, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference Workshops, 2004. GlobeCom Workshops 2004..

[37]  Adrian Farrel,et al.  Network Working Group Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (gmpls) Traffic Engineering Management Information Base , 2007 .

[38]  Robert L. Grossman,et al.  A peer-to-peer infrastructure for distributing large scientific data sets over wide area high-performance networks: experimental studies using wide area layer 2 services , 2007, GridNets '07.

[39]  Joel Mambretti,et al.  Optical Switching Middleware for the OptlPuter , 2003 .

[40]  Shawn McKee,et al.  TeraPaths: End-to-End Network Path QoS Configuration Using Cross-Domain Reservation Negotiation , 2006, 2006 3rd International Conference on Broadband Communications, Networks and Systems.

[41]  Andy C. Bavier,et al.  TransCloud - Design Considerations for a High-performance Cloud Architecture Across Multiple Administrative Domains , 2011, CLOSER.