The camera convergence problem revisited

Convergence of the real or virtual stereoscopic cameras is an important operation in stereoscopic display systems. For example, convergence can shift the range of portrayed depth to improve visual comfort; can adjust the disparity of targets to bring them nearer to the screen and reduce accommodation-vergence conflict; or can bring objects of interest into the binocular field-of-view. Although camera convergence is acknowledged as a useful function, there has been considerable debate over the transformation required. It is well known that rotational camera convergence or 'toe-in' distorts the images in the two cameras producing patterns of horizontal and vertical disparities that can cause problems with fusion of the stereoscopic imagery. Behaviorally, similar retinal vertical disparity patterns are known to correlate with viewing distance and strongly affect perception of stereoscopic shape and depth. There has been little analysis of the implications of recent findings on vertical disparity processing for the design of stereoscopic camera and display systems. We ask how such distortions caused by camera convergence affect the ability to fuse and perceive stereoscopic images.

[1]  William Ribarsky,et al.  A Geometric Comparison of Algorithms for Fusion Control in Stereoscopic HTDs , 2002, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[2]  L. Lipton.  Foundations of the Stereoscopic Cinema , 1982 .

[3]  S. Freguia.  Researches in Binocular Vision. , 1950 .

[4]  B Gillam,et al.  The role of vertical disparity in the scaling of stereoscopic depth perception: An empirical and theoretical study , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  Derek H. Fender,et al.  Human Engineering in Stereoscopic Viewing Devices , 1993, Advances in Computer Vision and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  B. Gillam,et al.  The induced effect, vertical disparity, and stereoscopic theory , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  I. P. Howard,et al.  Effects of stimulus size and eccentricity on horizontal and vertical vergence , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  Neil A. Dodgson.  Resampling radially captured images for perspectively correct stereoscopic display , 1998, Electronic Imaging.

[9]  O. Faugeras,et al.  The Geometry of Multiple Images , 1999 .

[10]  Laurie M. Wilcox,et al.  Viewing stereoscopic images comfortably: the effects of whole-field vertical disparity , 2002, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[11]  J. P. Southall,et al.  HELMHOLTZ' PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS , 1926 .

[12]  Mel W. Siegel,et al.  Just enough reality: comfortable 3-D viewing via microstereopsis , 2000, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[13]  Luis Perez-Bayas.  Human factors involved in perception and action in a natural stereoscopic world: an up-to-date review with guidelines for stereoscopic displays and stereoscopic virtual reality (VR) , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[14]  R. S Allison,et al.  Depth selectivity of vertical fusional mechanisms , 2000, Vision Research.

[15]  B. Rogers,et al.  The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues , 1996, Vision Research.

[16]  Filippo Speranza,et al.  Improving the visual comfort of stereoscopic images , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[17]  J. Porrill,et al.  Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations , 1995, Vision Research.

[18]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments , 1995, Vision Research.

[19]  J. E. W. Mayhew,et al.  A computational model of binocular depth perception , 1982, Nature.

[20]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis , 1993, Nature.