ATUCAPTS: Automated Tests that a User Cannot Pass Twice Simultaneously

In highly anonymous environments such as the Internet, many applications suffer from the fact that a single user can pose as multiple users. Indeed, presumably many potential applications do not even get off the ground as a result. Consider the example of an online vote. Requiring voters to provide identifying information, to the extent that this is even feasible, can significantly deter participation. On the other hand, not doing so makes it possible for a single individual to vote more than once, so that the result may become almost meaningless. (A quick web search will reveal many examples of Internet polls with bizarre outcomes.) CAPTCHAs may prevent running a program that votes many times, but they do nothing to prevent a single user from voting many times by hand. In this paper, we propose ATUCAPTS (Automated Tests That a User Cannot Pass Twice Simultaneously) as a solution. ATUCAPTS are automatically generated tests such that it is (1) easy for a user to pass one instance, but (2) extremely difficult for a user to pass two instances at the same time. Thus, if it is feasible to require all users to take such a test at the same time, we can verify that no user holds more than one account. We propose a specific class of ATUCAPTS and present the results of a human subjects study to validate that they satisfy the two properties above. We also introduce several theoretical models of how well an attacker might perform and show that these models still allow for good performance on both (1) and (2) with reasonable test lengths.

[1]  S. Tipper,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.

[2]  Manuel Blum,et al.  Peekaboom: a game for locating objects in images , 2006, CHI.

[3]  John Langford,et al.  CAPTCHA: Using Hard AI Problems for Security , 2003, EUROCRYPT.

[4]  Laura A. Dabbish,et al.  Labeling images with a computer game , 2004, AAAI Spring Symposium: Knowledge Collection from Volunteer Contributors.

[5]  Stephen Wee Hun Lim,et al.  Splitting Visual Focal Attention? It Probably Depends on Who You Are , 2012, CogSci.

[6]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[7]  R. Klein,et al.  Splitting versus sharing focal attention: comment on Castiello and Umiltà (1992). , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  K. Cave,et al.  Split attention as part of a flexible attentional system for complex scenes: comment on Jans, Peters, and De Weerd (2010). , 2010, Psychological review.

[9]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  P. De Weerd,et al.  Visual spatial attention to multiple locations at once: the jury is still out. , 2010, Psychological review.

[11]  U. Castiello,et al.  Splitting focal attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Nils J. Nilsson,et al.  Artificial Intelligence , 1974, IFIP Congress.

[13]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Combinatorial Auctions , 2005, Encyclopedia of Wireless Networks.

[14]  R Klein,et al.  The spatial distribution of attention during covert visual orienting. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[15]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[16]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Using a Memory Test to Limit a User to One Account , 2008, AMEC/TADA.

[19]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Attentional distribution in the visual field duringsame-different judgments as assessed by response competition , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  John Langford,et al.  Telling humans and computers apart automatically , 2004, CACM.

[21]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Psychological Review , 2003 .

[22]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  The effect of false-name bids in combinatorial auctions: new fraud in internet auctions , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[23]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[25]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Robust Combinatorial Auction Protocol against False-Name Bids , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[26]  Manuel Blum,et al.  Telling Humans and Computers Apart Automatically or How Lazy Cryptographers do AI , 2002 .