Comparison of estimators in nested case–control studies with multiple outcomes

Reuse of controls in a nested case–control (NCC) study has not been considered feasible since the controls are matched to their respective cases. However, in the last decade or so, methods have been developed that break the matching and allow for analyses where the controls are no longer tied to their cases. These methods can be divided into two groups; weighted partial likelihood (WPL) methods and full maximum likelihood methods. The weights in the WPL can be estimated in different ways and four estimation procedures are discussed. In addition, we address modifications needed to accommodate left truncation. A full likelihood approach is also presented and we suggest an aggregation technique to decrease the computation time. Furthermore, we generalize calibration for case-cohort designs to NCC studies. We consider a competing risks situation and compare WPL, full likelihood and calibration through simulations and analyses on a real data example.

[1]  J F Lawless,et al.  Likelihood analysis of multi-state models for disease incidence and mortality. , 1988, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  A. Scott,et al.  Fitting Logistic Models Under Case‐Control or Choice Based Sampling , 1986 .

[3]  Saarela Olli,et al.  Conditional likelihood inference in a case- cohort design: an application to haplotype analysis. , 2007 .

[4]  Thomas Lumley,et al.  Improved Horvitz–Thompson Estimation of Model Parameters from Two-phase Stratified Samples: Applications in Epidemiology , 2009, Statistics in biosciences.

[5]  L. J. Wei,et al.  The Robust Inference for the Cox Proportional Hazards Model , 1989 .

[6]  Kani Chen,et al.  Generalized case–cohort sampling , 2001 .

[7]  F. D. K. Liddell,et al.  Methods of Cohort Analysis : Appraisal by Application to Asbestos Mining , 1977 .

[8]  Thomas H Scheike,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation for Cox's regression model under nested case-control sampling. , 2004, Biostatistics.

[9]  Olli Saarela,et al.  Nested case–control data utilized for multiple outcomes: a likelihood approach and alternatives , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  Wenbin Lu,et al.  Cox Regression in Nested Case–Control Studies with Auxiliary Covariates , 2010, Biometrics.

[11]  Michal Kulich,et al.  Improving the Efficiency of Relative-Risk Estimation in Case-Cohort Studies , 2004 .

[12]  C. Särndal,et al.  Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling , 1992 .

[13]  Carl-Erik Särndal,et al.  Generalized Raking Procedures in Survey Sampling , 1993 .

[14]  J. Boivin,et al.  External Comparisons from Nested Case‐Control Designs , 1998, Epidemiology.

[15]  A. Scott,et al.  Fitting Logistic Regression Models in Stratified Case-Control Studies , 1991 .

[16]  Thomas Lumley,et al.  Using the whole cohort in the analysis of case-cohort data. , 2009, American journal of epidemiology.

[17]  Anders Skrondal,et al.  Stratified Case‐Cohort Analysis of General Cohort Sampling Designs , 2007 .

[18]  Bryan Langholz,et al.  Methods for the Analysis of Sampled Cohort Data in the Cox Proportional Hazards Model , 1995 .

[19]  W. Barlow,et al.  Robust variance estimation for the case-cohort design. , 1994, Biometrics.

[20]  R. L. Prentice,et al.  A case-cohort design for epidemiologic cohort studies and disease prevention trials , 1986 .

[21]  Sven Ove Samuelsen,et al.  A psudolikelihood approach to analysis of nested case-control studies , 1997 .

[22]  P. Magnus,et al.  Birth weight and mortality in childhood in Norway. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[23]  Agus Salim,et al.  Combining data from 2 nested case-control studies of overlapping cohorts to improve efficiency. , 2009, Biostatistics.

[24]  Thomas Lumley,et al.  Complex Surveys: A Guide to Analysis Using R , 2010 .