Communication Quality in Business Negotiations

The quality of a business negotiation process is usually assessed by its economic outcome, e.g. in terms of Pareto efficiency or distance to Nash equilibrium. We argue that this assessment method is insufficient in that it fails to provide a comprehensive analysis of business negotiations. Negotiators engage in highly complex communication tasks, and these communication processes should be analysed along with the outcome in the overall evaluation of a business negotiation. To this end, we will introduce Communication Quality as a new construct for analyzing the negotiation process. Furthermore, it will be argued that Communication Quality itself can affect economic negotiation outcomes both short- and long-term. We will present relevant aspects of Communication Quality, outline a scheme for its operationalisation and measurement, and discuss its probable impacts on business negotiations.

[1]  C. Morris.  Foundations of the theory of signs , 1938 .

[2]  Christopher Orpen,et al.  The Interactive Effects of Communication Quality and Job Involvement on Managerial Job Satisfaction and Work Motivation , 1997 .

[3]  S. Lloyd.  Conflict in Premarital Relationships: Differential Perceptions of Males and Females. , 1987 .

[4]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[5]  S. Duck,et al.  Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions. , 1998 .

[6]  Ralf Peters,et al.  Elektronische Märkte und automatisierte Verhandlungen , 2000, Wirtschaftsinf..

[7]  L. Thompson,et al.  A Look into the Mind of the Negotiator: Mental Models in Negotiation , 2003 .

[8]  D. W. Barclay,et al.  The Effects of Organizational Differences and Trust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships , 1997 .

[9]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Communication , 1950 .

[10]  P. Carnevale,et al.  Methods in negotiation research: Introduction , 2004 .

[11]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[12]  J. Hauser,et al.  The House of Quality , 1988 .

[13]  R. Carnap,et al.  INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF UNIFIED SCIENCE. , 1939, Science.

[14]  H. Raiffa.  The art and science of negotiation , 1983 .

[15]  Markus Spörndli.  Discourse quality and political decisions: an empirical analysis of debates in the German Conference Committee , 2003 .

[16]  C. Carter,et al.  The impact of electronic reverse auctions on supplier performance: The mediating role of relationship variables , 2007 .

[17]  Melvin F. Shakun,et al.  Right Problem Solving: Doing the Right Thing Right , 2003 .

[18]  Hans Weigand,et al.  B2B Negotiation Support: The Need for a Communication Perspective , 2003 .

[19]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Communication and Negotiation , 1992 .

[20]  James K. Sebenius,et al.  Negotiating the spirit of the deal. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[21]  A. Dennis,et al.  Paradox of richness: a cognitive model of media choice , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[22]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[23]  Annette N. Shelby,et al.  Communication Quality Revisited: Exploring the Link with Persuasive Effects , 1998 .

[24]  Stephen M. Garcia.  Power and the Illusion of Transparency in Negotiations , 2002 .

[25]  Katharina Holzinger,et al.  Verhandeln statt Argumentieren oder Verhandeln durch Argumentieren? Eine empirische Analyse auf der Basis der Sprechakttheorie , 2001 .

[26]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[27]  Hans Weigand,et al.  Towards a Semiotic Communications Quality Model , 2001, Organizational Semiotics.

[28]  A. Firth.  The Discourse of Negotiation , 2005 .

[29]  Lisa Hisae Nishii,et al.  Negotiating Rationally: The Dynamics of the Relational-Self in Negotiations , 2017 .

[30]  M. Schoop.  A Language-Action Approach to Electronic Negotiations , 2005 .

[31]  Tara M. Emmers-Sommer,et al.  The Effect of Communication Quality and Quantity Indicators on Intimacy and Relational Satisfaction , 2004 .

[32]  Owen Eriksson.  Communication Quality in the Context of Information Systems and Business Processes , 2002 .

[33]  Mike Robinson,et al.  Double-level languages and co-operative working , 2005, AI & SOCIETY.

[34]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Menschliche Kommunikation : Formen, Störungen, Parodoxien , 1996 .

[35]  Mareike Schoop,et al.  An introduction to the language-action perspective , 2001, SIGG.

[36]  Jakki J. Mohr,et al.  Communication Flows in Distribution Channels: Impact on Assessments of Communication Quality and Satisfaction , 1995 .

[37]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Shared Cognition as a Product of, and Precursor to, Shared Identity in Negotiations , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[38]  Mareike Schoop,et al.  Challenges and Solutions , 2004, J. Decis. Syst..

[39]  B. Montgomery.  Quality communication in personal relationships. , 1988 .

[40]  A. Firth.  CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW , 1995 .

[41]  Harald Müller.  Arguing, Bargaining and all that: Communicative Action, Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations , 2004 .

[42]  S. Koeszegi,et al.  Hot Versus Cool Behavioural Styles in Electronic Negotiations: The Impact of Communication Mode , 2006 .

[43]  Charles Pavitt,et al.  An Examination of the Coherence of Group Discussions , 1999 .

[44]  R. Fisher,et al.  Das Harvard-Konzept , 2011 .

[45]  B. Montgomery,et al.  The Form and Function of Quality Communication in Marriage. , 1981 .

[46]  R. Jorna,et al.  COORDINATION AND COMMUNICATION USING SIGNS: STUDIES IN ORGANISATIONAL SEMIOTICS 2 , 2002 .