The time course of predictability effects in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations

To investigate the time course of predictability effects in reading, the present study examined distributions of first-fixation durations on target words in a low predictability versus a high predictability prior context. In a replication of Staub (2011), ex-Gaussian fitting demonstrated that the low predictability distribution was significantly shifted to the right of the high predictability distribution in the absence of any contextual differences in the degree of skew. Extending this finding, the present study used a survival analysis technique to demonstrate a significant influence of predictability on fixation duration as early as 140 ms from the start of fixation, which is similar to prior results obtained with the word frequency variable. These results provide convergent evidence that lexical variables have a fast acting influence on fixation durations during reading. Implications for models of eye-movement control are discussed.

[1]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Ronan G. Reilly,et al.  Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[3]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  M. Just,et al.  The psychology of reading and language comprehension , 1986 .

[5]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Shun-Nan Yang,et al.  An oculomotor-based model of eye movements in reading: The competition/interaction model , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[7]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[8]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[9]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  The mind's eye : cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research , 2003 .

[10]  George W. McConkie,et al.  How Cognition Affects Eye Movements During Reading , 2003 .

[11]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading: Models and data , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  A Model of the Time Course and Content of Reading , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Ronan G. Reilly,et al.  Chapter 21 – Foundations of an Interactive Activation Model of Eye Movement Control in Reading , 2003 .

[14]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  E–Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[15]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Current advances in SWIFT , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[16]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[17]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Commentary on Section 2. Attention, information processing and eye movement control. , 2000 .

[18]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance The Distribution of Fixation Durations During Reading : Effects of Stimulus Quality , 2011 .

[19]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: Methods and packages , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[20]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Direct control of fixation times in scene viewing: Evidence from analysis of the distribution of first fixation duration , 2012 .

[21]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Reading Disappearing Text , 2003, Psychological science.

[22]  K. Rayner,et al.  Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading , 1981 .

[23]  M. Posner,et al.  Establishing a time‐line of word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event‐related potentials , 1998, Neuroreport.

[24]  G. Feng,et al.  Rowed to recovery: the use of phonological and orthographic information in reading Chinese and English. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  How tight is the link between lexical processing and saccade programs , 2003 .

[26]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Keith Rayner,et al.  The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  K. Rayner,et al.  Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Saccade Launch Site as a Predictor of Fixation Durations in Reading : Comments on Hand , Miellet , O ' Donnell , and Sereno ( 2010 ) , 2011 .

[32]  Heather Sheridan,et al.  The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: Evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[33]  S. Sereno,et al.  Context Effects in Word Recognition , 2003, Psychological science.

[34]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[35]  Adrian Staub,et al.  The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[38]  G. McConkie,et al.  Eye movements during reading: a theory of saccade initiation times , 2001, Vision Research.

[39]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Eye movement control in reading: accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model , 1999, Vision Research.

[41]  Gary Feng,et al.  Eye movements as time-series random variables: A stochastic model of eye movement control in reading , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[42]  R H S Carpenter,et al.  An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[43]  E. Reingold,et al.  Eye movements and visual expertise in chess and medicine , 2011 .

[44]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[45]  R. E. Morrison,et al.  Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Eye Movement Control during Reading: Effects of Word Frequency and Orthographic Familiarity Word Frequency Effects , 2022 .

[47]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[48]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing , 2002, Vision Research.