Comparison of debris removal with three different irrigation techniques.

[1]  F. Tay,et al.  Canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two irrigant agitation techniques in a closed system. , 2010, International endodontic journal.

[2]  T. Kirkpatrick,et al.  In vitro comparisons of debris removal of the EndoActivator system, the F file, ultrasonic irrigation, and NaOCl irrigation alone after hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  N. Cohenca,et al.  Effect of apical preparation size and preparation taper on irrigant volume delivered by using negative pressure irrigation system. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  R. Cisneros,et al.  Effect of EDTA, sonic, and ultrasonic activation on the penetration of sodium hypochlorite into simulated lateral canals: an in vitro study. , 2009, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  F. Tay,et al.  Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. , 2009, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  A. Reader,et al.  In vivo antibacterial efficacy of ultrasound after hand and rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  Benjamin A Nielsen,et al.  Comparison of the EndoVac system to needle irrigation of root canals. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[8]  K. Gulabivala,et al.  Effects of mechanical and chemical procedures on root canal surfaces , 2005 .

[9]  A. Reader,et al.  In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  M. Haapasalo,et al.  Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions , 2005 .

[11]  B. Applegate,et al.  Influence of irrigant needle depth in removing bioluminescent bacteria inoculated into instrumented root canals using real-time imaging in vitro. , 2005, International endodontic journal.

[12]  G. Svensäter,et al.  Biofilms in endodontic infections , 2004 .

[13]  M-K Wu,et al.  The effectiveness of syringe irrigation and ultrasonics to remove debris from simulated irregularities within prepared root canal walls. , 2004, International endodontic journal.

[14]  Ove A Peters,et al.  Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. , 2004, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  P R Wesselink,et al.  A primary observation on the preparation and obturation of oval canals. , 2001, International endodontic journal.

[16]  J F Siqueira,et al.  Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. , 2001, International endodontic journal.

[17]  D. Ørstavik,et al.  Essential Endodontology: Prevention and Treatment of Apical Periodontitis , 1998 .

[18]  R. Walton,et al.  Effect of precurving endosonic files on the amount of debris and smear layer remaining in curved root canals. , 1992, Journal of endodontics.

[19]  Gutmann Jl.  Clinical, radiographic, and histologic perspectives on success and failure in endodontics. , 1992 .

[20]  J. Gutmann.  Clinical, radiographic, and histologic perspectives on success and failure in endodontics. , 1992, Dental clinics of North America.

[21]  A. Walmsley,et al.  Canal markings produced by endosonic instruments. , 1991, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[22]  F. Vertucci.  Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. , 1984, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[23]  P. Wesselink,et al.  Factors promoting the tissue dissolving capability of sodium hypochlorite. , 1982, International endodontic journal.

[24]  G. Sundqvist,et al.  Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. , 1981, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[25]  H Schilder,et al.  Cleaning and shaping the root canal. , 1974, Dental clinics of North America.

[26]  A. Bjorndal,et al.  Root canal morphology of the human mandibular first molar. , 1971, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.