Object contour scanning using elastically supported technical vibrissae

Rodents, like mice and rats, use tactile hairs in the snout region (mystacial vibrissae) to acquire information about their environment, e.g., the shape or contour of obstacles. For this, the vibrissa is used for the perception of stimuli due to an object contact. Mechanoreceptors are processing units of these stimuli measured in the compliant support (follicle-sinus complex). We use this behavior from biology as an inspiration to set up a mechanical model for object contour scanning. In a plane, an elastic bending beam sweeps a rigid obstacle while the beam's foot passes by below the object. Prescribing a contour and a list of optional contact points on it, we apply Bernoulli's bending theory for large deformations in order to determine in a first step the elastic lines of the beam and the corresponding reactions of the support (the only observables in biology and technology). Taking these reaction values as data of a bending problem, an initial-value problem re-determines (within certain “measuring noise”) the starting contact points. This theoretical one-sweep scanning process is demonstrated by several examples, and their outcomes are compared to experimental results. The current confinements in theory and experimental setup and their removal are explained. A somewhat new topic could be to allow for rotationally elastic bearings of the beam instead of the usually preferred clamp. In contrast to other papers in this field, we deal with nonlinear theory throughout, follow analytical ways as far as possible, and use numerics only to find solutions of final finite equations.

[1]  Christopher D. Rahn,et al.  Three-dimensional contact imaging with an actuated whisker , 2006, IEEE Trans. Robotics.

[2]  Joachim Steigenberger A continuum model of passive vibrissae , 2013 .

[3]  H. Witte,et al.  Structural Characterization of the Whisker System of the Rat , 2012, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[4]  G. Debrégeas,et al.  An Amplitude Modulation/Demodulation Scheme for Whisker-Based Texture Perception , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Lucie A. Huet,et al.  Modeling Forces and Moments at the Base of a Rat Vibrissa during Noncontact Whisking and Whisking against an Object , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  T. Prescott,et al.  Biomimetic vibrissal sensing for robots , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Jan Awrejcewicz,et al.  On the general theory of chaotic dynamics of flexible curvilinear Euler–Bernoulli beams , 2015 .

[8]  DaeEun Kim,et al.  Biomimetic whiskers for shape recognition , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[9]  Nathan G. Clack,et al.  The Mechanical Variables Underlying Object Localization along the Axis of the Whisker , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  David Kleinfeld,et al.  Seeing What the Mouse Sees with Its Vibrissae: A Matter of Behavioral State , 2006, Neuron.

[11]  Joachim Steigenberger,et al.  Mathematical model of vibrissae for surface texture detection , 2015 .

[12]  Shigeo Hirose,et al.  The whisker sensor and the transmission of multiple sensor signals , 1989, Adv. Robotics.

[13]  Anthony G. Pipe,et al.  Whisking with robots , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[14]  Gregory R. Scholz,et al.  Profile sensing with an actuated whisker , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Joseph H. Solomon,et al.  Biomechanical models for radial distance determination by the rat vibrissal system. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Max Born,et al.  Untersuchungen über die Stabilität der elastischen Linie in Ebene und Raum, unter verschiedenen Grenzbedingungen , 1906 .