Receiver-operating characteristic analysis of multifocal VEPs to diagnose and quantify glaucomatous functional damage
暂无分享,去创建一个
Makoto Nakamura | Takayuki Nagai | Kumiko Ishikawa | Akira Negi | Makoto Nakamura | A. Negi | Kumiko Ishikawa | Takayuki Nagai
[1] S. Graham,et al. Comparison of Objective Diagnostic Tests in Glaucoma: Heidelberg Retinal Tomography and Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials , 2006, Journal of glaucoma.
[2] Ivan Goldberg,et al. Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.
[3] Donald C. Hood,et al. A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records , 2002, Documenta Ophthalmologica.
[4] S. Graham,et al. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[5] J. Caprioli,et al. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.
[6] Douglas R. Anderson. Automated Static Perimetry , 1992 .
[7] Thomas Meigen,et al. Optimizing electrode positions and analysis strategies for multifocal VEP recordings by ROC analysis , 2007, Vision Research.
[8] Makoto Nakamura,et al. Optimal conditions for multifocal VEP recording for normal Japanese population established by receiver operating characteristic analysis , 2011, Documenta Ophthalmologica.
[9] Donald C. Hood,et al. A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage , 2007, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.
[10] S. Graham,et al. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.
[11] S. Graham,et al. Objective perimetry in glaucoma. , 2000, Ophthalmology.
[12] S. Klein,et al. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[13] E. DeLong,et al. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.
[14] S Vida,et al. A computer program for non-parametric receiver operating characteristic analysis. , 1993, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.
[15] Nitin Ohri,et al. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[16] D. Henson,et al. Test-retest variability of multifocal visual evoked potential and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[17] Makoto Nakamura,et al. Regional relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and corresponding visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes. , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.
[18] S Kangovi,et al. An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[19] Donald C Hood,et al. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma , 2003, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.
[20] J. Hanley,et al. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.
[21] V. Greenstein,et al. Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: evidence of a linear relationship. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.
[22] Chris A Johnson,et al. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.
[23] D. Hood,et al. Detecting Glaucomatous Damage with Multifocal Visual Evoked Potentials: How Can a Monocular Test Work? , 2003, Journal of glaucoma.
[24] J. R. Landis,et al. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.