Seed Plant Relationships and the Systematic Position of Gnetales Based on Nuclear and Chloroplast DNA: Conflicting Data, Rooting Problems, and the Monophyly of Conifers

We investigated the systematic position of Gnetales and other seed plant groups using molecular data from 119 land plant species. More than 100 new sequences of rbcL, atpB, 26S, and 18S ribosomal DNA were analyzed together with available GenBank sequences. To evaluate thoroughly the phylogenetic information of each gene, the four data sets were analyzed both separately and combined using different character coding. We found no supported conflict between codon positions in the plastid sequences, but we found a more complex pattern, indicating conflict between transitions and transversions, within each position. Including all information, plastid data results in a “Gnetales basal” phylogeny, whereas nuclear data weakly supports anthophytes. When transitions are excluded, Gnetales associate with conifers. Our study does not answer all questions on seed plant phylogeny, but it does show conifers as monophyletic with high support, rejecting a close relationship between Gnetales and the conifer family Pinaceae. Nuclear and chloroplast data produced essentially identical phylogenies except for the position of the seed plant root, and a sister relationship between Gnetales and angiosperms could not be fully ruled out. These results strongly conflict with previously published analyses of mitochondrial data.

[1]  Kevin C. Nixon,et al.  A Reevaluation of Seed Plant Phylogeny , 1994 .

[2]  M. P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) Version 4 , 2000 .

[3]  D. Soltis,et al.  Basal Lineages of Angiosperms: Relationships and Implications for Floral Evolution , 2000, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[4]  James F. Smith Phylogenetics of seed plants : An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL , 1993 .

[5]  C. Bult,et al.  TESTING SIGNIFICANCE OF INCONGRUENCE , 1994 .

[6]  J. Parkin,et al.  Studies on the Evolution of the AngiospermsThe Relationship of the Angiosperms to the Gnetales , 1908 .

[7]  C. dePamphilis,et al.  Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three genomic compartments: extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales' closest relatives are conifers. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D. Soltis,et al.  Phylogeny of Basal Angiosperms: Analyses of Five Genes from Three Genomes1 , 2000, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[9]  W. Kress,et al.  Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences , 2000 .

[10]  Peter R. Crane,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms , 1985 .

[11]  S. B. Hoot,et al.  The Utility of atpB Gene Sequences in Resolving Phylogenetic Relationships: Comparison with rbcL and 18S Ribosomal DNA Sequences in the Lardizabalaceae , 1995 .

[12]  M. Ruvolo,et al.  Molecular evolutionary dynamics of cytochrome b in strepsirrhine primates: the phylogenetic significance of third-position transversions. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  J. Farris,et al.  Homoplasy Increases Phylogenetic Structure , 1999 .

[14]  P. Crane The Fossil History of the Gnetales , 1996, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[15]  H. Saedler,et al.  MADS-box genes reveal that gnetophytes are more closely related to conifers than to flowering plants. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Marc W. Allard,et al.  The Random Cladist: A Review of the Software Package RANDOM CLADISTICS , 1999 .

[17]  J. Farris,et al.  PARSIMONY JACKKNIFING OUTPERFORMS NEIGHBOR‐JOINING , 1996, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[18]  K. Bremer THE LIMITS OF AMINO ACID SEQUENCE DATA IN ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENETIC RECONSTRUCTION , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  J. Doyle PHYLOGENY OF VASCULAR PLANTS , 1998 .

[20]  J. Farris THE RETENTION INDEX AND THE RESCALED CONSISTENCY INDEX , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[21]  D. Soltis,et al.  The phylogenetic potential of entire 26S rDNA sequences in plants. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.

[22]  N. Wikström,et al.  Phylogeny of Lycopodiaceae (Lycopsida) and the Relationships of Phylloglossum drummondii Kunze Based on rbcL Sequences , 1997, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[23]  S. Carlquist Wood, Bark, and Stem Anatomy of Gnetales: A Summary , 1996, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[24]  J. Palmer,et al.  Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gnetales from conifers. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Doyle Molecules, morphology, fossils, and the relationship of angiosperms and Gnetales. , 1998, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[26]  J. Farris,et al.  Quantitative Phyletics and the Evolution of Anurans , 1969 .

[27]  W. Martin,et al.  Gnetum and the Angiosperms: Molecular Evidence that Their Shared Morphological Characters Are Convergent, Rather than Homologous , 1999 .

[28]  J. Doyle Seed Plant Phylogeny and the Relationships of Gnetales , 1996, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[29]  Ross A. Overbeek,et al.  The genetic data environment an expandable GUI for multiple sequence analysis , 1994, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[30]  M. Sanderson,et al.  Error, bias, and long-branch attraction in data for two chloroplast photosystem genes in seed plants. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[31]  Mats Björklund,et al.  Are Third Positions Really That Bad? A Test Using Vertebrate Cytochrome b , 1999, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[32]  J. Farris,et al.  Congruence among Mammalian Mitochondrial Genes , 1999 .

[33]  G. Zurawski Evolution of Higher-Plant Chloroplast DNA-Encoded Genes: Implications for Structure-Function and Phylogenetic Studies , 1987 .

[34]  R. Olmstead,et al.  Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. , 2000, American journal of botany.

[35]  P. Crane,et al.  The origin and early diversification of land plants : a cladistic study , 1997 .

[36]  G. Rothwell,et al.  Lignophyte phylogeny and the evolution of spermatophytes : a numerical cladistic analysis , 1994 .

[37]  D. Swofford PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .

[38]  R Staden,et al.  The staden sequence analysis package , 1996, Molecular biotechnology.

[39]  I. Bailey THE DEVELOPMENT OF VESSELS IN ANGIOSPERMS AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE IN MORPHOLOGICAL RESEARCH , 1944 .

[40]  Mark W. Chase,et al.  The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes , 1999, Nature.

[41]  K. Bremer,et al.  BRANCH SUPPORT AND TREE STABILITY , 1994 .

[42]  A. Meyer,et al.  Shortcomings of the cytochrome b gene as a molecular marker. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  J. Farris,et al.  The implications of congruence in Menidia , 1981 .

[44]  Michael J. Donoghue,et al.  Seed plant phylogeny: Demise of the anthophyte hypothesis? , 2000, Current Biology.

[45]  Paul G. Wolf,et al.  Horsetails and ferns are a monophyletic group and the closest living relatives to seed plants , 2001, Nature.

[46]  W. P. Thompson Independent Evolution of Vessels in Gnetales and Angiosperms , 1918, Botanical Gazette.

[47]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Integration of morphological and ribosomal RNA data on the origin of angiosperms , 1994 .

[48]  M. Jager,et al.  Phylogenetic relationships of conifers inferred from partial 28S rRNA gene sequences. , 1998, American journal of botany.

[49]  J. Farris Estimating Phylogenetic Trees from Distance Matrices , 1972, The American Naturalist.