Seed Plant Relationships and the Systematic Position of Gnetales Based on Nuclear and Chloroplast DNA: Conflicting Data, Rooting Problems, and the Monophyly of Conifers
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Kevin C. Nixon,et al. A Reevaluation of Seed Plant Phylogeny , 1994 .
[2] M. P. Cummings,et al. PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) Version 4 , 2000 .
[3] D. Soltis,et al. Basal Lineages of Angiosperms: Relationships and Implications for Floral Evolution , 2000, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[4] James F. Smith. Phylogenetics of seed plants : An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL , 1993 .
[5] C. Bult,et al. TESTING SIGNIFICANCE OF INCONGRUENCE , 1994 .
[6] J. Parkin,et al. Studies on the Evolution of the AngiospermsThe Relationship of the Angiosperms to the Gnetales , 1908 .
[7] C. dePamphilis,et al. Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three genomic compartments: extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales' closest relatives are conifers. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[8] D. Soltis,et al. Phylogeny of Basal Angiosperms: Analyses of Five Genes from Three Genomes1 , 2000, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[9] W. Kress,et al. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences , 2000 .
[10] Peter R. Crane,et al. Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms , 1985 .
[11] S. B. Hoot,et al. The Utility of atpB Gene Sequences in Resolving Phylogenetic Relationships: Comparison with rbcL and 18S Ribosomal DNA Sequences in the Lardizabalaceae , 1995 .
[12] M. Ruvolo,et al. Molecular evolutionary dynamics of cytochrome b in strepsirrhine primates: the phylogenetic significance of third-position transversions. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.
[13] J. Farris,et al. Homoplasy Increases Phylogenetic Structure , 1999 .
[14] P. Crane. The Fossil History of the Gnetales , 1996, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[15] H. Saedler,et al. MADS-box genes reveal that gnetophytes are more closely related to conifers than to flowering plants. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[16] Marc W. Allard,et al. The Random Cladist: A Review of the Software Package RANDOM CLADISTICS , 1999 .
[17] J. Farris,et al. PARSIMONY JACKKNIFING OUTPERFORMS NEIGHBOR‐JOINING , 1996, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[18] K. Bremer. THE LIMITS OF AMINO ACID SEQUENCE DATA IN ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENETIC RECONSTRUCTION , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[19] J. Doyle. PHYLOGENY OF VASCULAR PLANTS , 1998 .
[20] J. Farris. THE RETENTION INDEX AND THE RESCALED CONSISTENCY INDEX , 1989, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[21] D. Soltis,et al. The phylogenetic potential of entire 26S rDNA sequences in plants. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.
[22] N. Wikström,et al. Phylogeny of Lycopodiaceae (Lycopsida) and the Relationships of Phylloglossum drummondii Kunze Based on rbcL Sequences , 1997, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[23] S. Carlquist. Wood, Bark, and Stem Anatomy of Gnetales: A Summary , 1996, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[24] J. Palmer,et al. Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origin of Gnetales from conifers. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[25] J. Doyle. Molecules, morphology, fossils, and the relationship of angiosperms and Gnetales. , 1998, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[26] J. Farris,et al. Quantitative Phyletics and the Evolution of Anurans , 1969 .
[27] W. Martin,et al. Gnetum and the Angiosperms: Molecular Evidence that Their Shared Morphological Characters Are Convergent, Rather than Homologous , 1999 .
[28] J. Doyle. Seed Plant Phylogeny and the Relationships of Gnetales , 1996, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[29] Ross A. Overbeek,et al. The genetic data environment an expandable GUI for multiple sequence analysis , 1994, Comput. Appl. Biosci..
[30] M. Sanderson,et al. Error, bias, and long-branch attraction in data for two chloroplast photosystem genes in seed plants. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.
[31] Mats Björklund,et al. Are Third Positions Really That Bad? A Test Using Vertebrate Cytochrome b , 1999, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.
[32] J. Farris,et al. Congruence among Mammalian Mitochondrial Genes , 1999 .
[33] G. Zurawski. Evolution of Higher-Plant Chloroplast DNA-Encoded Genes: Implications for Structure-Function and Phylogenetic Studies , 1987 .
[34] R. Olmstead,et al. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. , 2000, American journal of botany.
[35] P. Crane,et al. The origin and early diversification of land plants : a cladistic study , 1997 .
[36] G. Rothwell,et al. Lignophyte phylogeny and the evolution of spermatophytes : a numerical cladistic analysis , 1994 .
[37] D. Swofford. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10 , 2002 .
[38] R Staden,et al. The staden sequence analysis package , 1996, Molecular biotechnology.
[39] I. Bailey. THE DEVELOPMENT OF VESSELS IN ANGIOSPERMS AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE IN MORPHOLOGICAL RESEARCH , 1944 .
[40] Mark W. Chase,et al. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes , 1999, Nature.
[41] K. Bremer,et al. BRANCH SUPPORT AND TREE STABILITY , 1994 .
[42] A. Meyer,et al. Shortcomings of the cytochrome b gene as a molecular marker. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[43] J. Farris,et al. The implications of congruence in Menidia , 1981 .
[44] Michael J. Donoghue,et al. Seed plant phylogeny: Demise of the anthophyte hypothesis? , 2000, Current Biology.
[45] Paul G. Wolf,et al. Horsetails and ferns are a monophyletic group and the closest living relatives to seed plants , 2001, Nature.
[46] W. P. Thompson. Independent Evolution of Vessels in Gnetales and Angiosperms , 1918, Botanical Gazette.
[47] M. Donoghue,et al. Integration of morphological and ribosomal RNA data on the origin of angiosperms , 1994 .
[48] M. Jager,et al. Phylogenetic relationships of conifers inferred from partial 28S rRNA gene sequences. , 1998, American journal of botany.
[49] J. Farris. Estimating Phylogenetic Trees from Distance Matrices , 1972, The American Naturalist.