Measuring lumbar back motion during functional activities using a portable strain gauge sensor-based system: A comparative evaluation and reliability study.

Quantifying lumbar back motion during functional activities in real-life environments may contribute to a better understanding of common pathologies such as spinal disorders. The current study therefore aimed at the comparative evaluation of the Epionics SPINE system, a portable device for measuring sagittal lumbar back motion during functional activities. Twenty healthy participants were therefore evaluated with the Epionics SPINE and a Vicon motion capture system in two identical separate research visits. They performed the following activities: standing, sitting, chair rising, box lifting, walking, running and a counter movement jump (CMJ). Lumbar lordosis angles were extracted as continuous values as well as average and range of motion (ROM) parameters. Agreement between the systems was evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses, whereas within- and between-session reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and minimal detectable changes (MDC). The analysis showed excellent agreement between the systems for chair rising, box lifting and CMJ with a systematic underestimation of lumbar lordosis angles during walking and running. Reliability was moderate to high for all continuous and discrete parameters (ICC ≥ 0.62), except for ROM during running (ICC = 0.29). MDC values were generally below 15°, except for CMJ (peak values up to 20° within and 25° between the sessions). The Epionics SPINE system performed similarly to a Vicon motion capture system for measuring lumbar lordosis angles during functional activities and showed high consistency within and between measurement sessions. These findings can serve researchers and clinicians as a bench mark for future investigations using the system in populations with spinal pathologies.

[1]  A. Mcgregor,et al.  Spinal segments do not move together predictably during daily activities , 2019, Gait & posture.

[2]  Julien Favre,et al.  Chronic low back pain patients walk with locally altered spinal kinematics. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Alison H. McGregor,et al.  Wearable technology for spine movement assessment: A systematic review , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  M. Dreischarf,et al.  The effects of age and gender on the lumbopelvic rhythm in the sagittal plane in 309 subjects. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Comparative evaluation of a novel measurement tool to assess lumbar spine posture and range of motion , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[6]  William R Taylor,et al.  A novel system for the dynamic assessment of back shape. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  S. Armand,et al.  The relationship between different body mass index categories and chair rise performance in adult women. , 2013, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[8]  William R Taylor,et al.  Spinal kinematics during gait in healthy individuals across different age groups. , 2017, Human movement science.

[9]  F. Graichen,et al.  How do we stand? Variations during repeated standing phases of asymptomatic subjects and low back pain patients. , 2017, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  F. Rojas,et al.  An analysis of two styles of arm action in the vertical countermovement jump , 2014, Sports biomechanics.

[11]  Todd C. Pataky,et al.  One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping in Python , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[12]  Karlie Gross,et al.  Differences in lumbar spine and lower extremity kinematics during a step down functional task in people with and people without low back pain , 2017, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  R. Adler,et al.  Random Fields and Geometry , 2007 .

[14]  Kaila L. Stipancic,et al.  Minimally Detectable Change and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of a Decline in Sentence Intelligibility and Speaking Rate for Individuals With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. , 2018, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[15]  William R Taylor,et al.  Automatic distinction of upper body motions in the main anatomical planes. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  Lucas C Ferreira,et al.  Reach Height and Jump Displacement: Implications for Standardization of Reach Determination , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[17]  R. List,et al.  Kinematics of the Trunk and the Lower Extremities During Restricted and Unrestricted Squats , 2013, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[18]  C. Meylan,et al.  Variability and Influence of Eccentric Kinematics on Unilateral Vertical, Horizontal, and Lateral Countermovement Jump Performance , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[19]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Measurement of the number of lumbar spinal movements in the sagittal plane in a 24-hour period , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[20]  R. V. van Deursen,et al.  Non-specific chronic low back pain: differences in spinal kinematics in subgroups during functional tasks , 2017, European Spine Journal.

[21]  Silvio Lorenzetti,et al.  Soft Tissue Artefacts of the Human Back: Comparison of the Sagittal Curvature of the Spine Measured Using Skin Markers and an Open Upright MRI , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  Alexandra Pfister,et al.  Comparative abilities of Microsoft Kinect and Vicon 3D motion capture for gait analysis , 2014, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[23]  Trevor Kingsbury,et al.  Reliability of 3D gait data across multiple laboratories. , 2016, Gait & posture.

[24]  Julien Favre,et al.  Multi-segment analysis of spinal kinematics during sit-to-stand in patients with chronic low back pain. , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  J. Weir Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. , 2005, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[26]  A. Rohlmann,et al.  Velocity of Lordosis Angle during Spinal Flexion and Extension , 2012, PloS one.

[27]  Reinald Brunner,et al.  Using Skin Markers for Spinal Curvature Quantification in Main Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Explorative Radiographic Study , 2015, PloS one.

[28]  Sandra Reitmaier,et al.  What does the shape of our back tell us? Correlation between sacrum orientation and lumbar lordosis. , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[29]  M. Dreischarf,et al.  Differences between clinical "snap-shot" and "real-life" assessments of lumbar spine alignment and motion - What is the "real" lumbar lordosis of a human being? , 2016, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Sara P. Gombatto,et al.  Lumbar spine kinematics during walking in people with and people without low back pain. , 2015, Gait & posture.

[31]  Katrin Schweizer,et al.  Upper body movements in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy walking with and without an ankle-foot orthosis. , 2014, Clinical biomechanics.

[32]  Antonius Rohlmann,et al.  Age-Related Loss of Lumbar Spinal Lordosis and Mobility – A Study of 323 Asymptomatic Volunteers , 2014, PloS one.

[33]  Peter S Theobald,et al.  Reliability of an accelerometer-based system for quantifying multiregional spinal range of motion. , 2015, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[34]  D. Altman,et al.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[35]  J. Wilken,et al.  Reliability and Minimal Detectible Change values for gait kinematics and kinetics in healthy adults. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[36]  A. Leardini,et al.  Data management in gait analysis for clinical applications. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[37]  Angelo M. Sabatini,et al.  Estimating Orientation Using Magnetic and Inertial Sensors and Different Sensor Fusion Approaches: Accuracy Assessment in Manual and Locomotion Tasks , 2014, Sensors.