Fieldwork Roles and Informational Yield

One of the basic premises of role theory is that all roles, by virtue of their attendant rights and obligations, function as avenues and barriers to other roles and their information bases and perspectives. Using this premise as a point of departure, this article examines how different fieldwork roles facilitate and impede access to different types of information. The types of information considered include (1) direct experience, (2) observationally derived data, (3) members' narrations or their accounts and recounts of their practices and activities, and (4) the “hard data” variety associated with institutional record keeping and formal communication practices. Access to these varieties of information are analyzed in terms of four distinct fieldwork roles employed in studies of recruitment and conversion to a religious “cult,” decision making and intergroup competition and cooperation in the peace movement, and homelessness in a sun belt city. The analysis concludes with a discussion of a number of methodological implications regarding the relationship between different fieldwork roles and their relative informational yield.

[1]  Ralph H. Turner,et al.  Role-Taking, Role Standpoint, and Reference-Group Behavior , 1956, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Morris S. Schwartz,et al.  Problems in Participant Observation , 1955, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .

[4]  Arnold M. Rose,et al.  Human Behavior and Social Processes , 2013 .

[5]  R. Emerson,et al.  Observational Field Work , 1981 .

[6]  S. Stryker.  Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version , 1980 .

[7]  L. Zurcher,et al.  Social Roles: Conformity, Conflict and Creativity , 1983 .

[8]  George J. McCall,et al.  Issues in Participant Observation; A Text and Reader. , 1969 .

[9]  A. Schutz.  Collected Papers I. The Problem of Social Reality , 1972 .

[10]  Elijah Anderson,et al.  A place on the corner , 1978 .

[11]  George J. Mccall.  Observing the Law: Field Methods in the Study of Crime and the Criminal Justice System , 1977 .

[12]  R. Burgess.  In the Field: An Introduction to Field Research , 1984 .

[13]  A. Macintyre,et al.  After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. , 1981 .

[14]  R. Collins.  Sociological theory, 1983 , 1983 .

[15]  Steven J. Taylor.  Introduction to qualitative research methods , 1975 .

[16]  T. Abel,et al.  Mind, Self, and Society , 1934 .

[17]  B. Thorne,et al.  Protest and the problem of credibility: Uses of Knowledge and Risk-Taking in the Draft Resistance Movement of the 1960's , 1975 .

[18]  Robert R. Faulkner,et al.  Qualitative Sociology: A Method to the Madness , 1979, Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews.

[19]  S. Bruyn.  The Human Perspective in Sociology: The Methodology of Participant Observation , 1986 .

[20]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[21]  R. Gold.  Roles in Sociological Field Observations , 1958 .

[22]  J. Hewitt.  Self and Society: A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology , 1976 .

[23]  Cécile Alves,et al.  Tally's Corner , 1967 .

[24]  G. Mead.  The Philosophy Of The Present , 1959 .

[25]  E. Goffman.  Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[26]  Barrie Thome.  Political Activist As Participant Observer: Conflicts Of Commitment In A Study Of The Draft Resistance Movement Of The 1960's* , 1979 .

[27]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[28]  W. James,et al.  The Will to Believe , 1997, Arguing About Knowledge.

[29]  W. Fisher.  Narration As a Human Communication Paradigm: The Case of Public Moral Argument , 1984 .

[30]  William Foote Whyte,et al.  Street Corner Society , 1943 .

[31]  B. Biddle,et al.  Role Theory: Concepts and Research , 1966 .

[32]  M. Bulmer.  When is disguise justified? Alternatives to covert participant observation , 1982 .

[33]  R. Linton.  The Study of Man , 1937 .

[34]  D. Snow.  A Dramaturgical Analysis Of Movement Accommodation: Building Idiosyncrasy Credit As A Movement Mobilization Strategy* , 1979 .

[35]  D. Snow,et al.  The Lofland-Stark Conversion Model: A Critical Reassessment , 1980 .