Application of normal wiggly dual hesitant fuzzy sets to site selection for hydrogen underground storage

Abstract The hesitant fuzzy set is a mathematical tool to express multiple values in decision making. If they could not give a resolution, it is important to give priority and importance to a number of different values. Here, we propose normal wiggly dual hesitant fuzzy set (NWDHFS), as an extension of normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy set. We define a new score function of normal wiggly dual hesitant fuzzy information. The NWDHFS can express deep ideas of membership and non-membership information. In this work, we use hesitant fuzzy set to expose the deepest ideas hidden in the thought-level of the decision makers. We show that the NWDHFS can handle the hesitant fuzzy information. It expresses the deeper ideas of hesitant fuzzy set. An illustration is provided to demonstrate the practicality and effectiveness to the application of site selection of the underground storage of hydrogen. We are compelled to look for alternating fuels to suits changing weather conditions and increasing number of vehicles. This alternative fuel is necessary to control global warming and to be economically viable. Based on this, hydrogen gas is selected as a good alternative fuel. The most important statement is the saving of the selected hydrogen gas. Thus, when saving hydrogen fuel, a safe storage space must be selected. Here, we use the MCDM ideas by use of proposed NWDHFV method is to select the appropriate hydrogen underground storage location.

[1]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[2]  K. Atanassov More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1989 .

[3]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Dual hesitant fuzzy VIKOR method for multi-criteria group decision making based on fuzzy measure and new comparison method , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[4]  Selman Aydin,et al.  The best fuel selection with hybrid multiple-criteria decision making approaches in a CI engine fueled with their blends and pure biodiesels produced from different sources , 2019, Renewable Energy.

[5]  Ahmet Beskese,et al.  Sustainability analysis of different hydrogen production options using hesitant fuzzy AHP , 2018, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[6]  R. Tarkowski,et al.  Screening and ranking framework for underground hydrogen storage site selection in Poland , 2018 .

[7]  Bernard W. Ikua,et al.  Selection of optimum fish oil fuel blend to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions in an IC engine—A hybrid multiple criteria decision aid approach , 2016 .

[8]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets , 2012, J. Appl. Math..

[9]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic VIKOR Method and Its Application in Qualitative Multiple Criteria Decision Making , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[10]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Site selection in waste management by the VIKOR method using linguistic assessment , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[11]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[12]  Harish Garg,et al.  Entropy Based Multi-criteria Decision Making Method under Fuzzy Environment and Unknown Attribute Weights , 2015 .

[13]  Muhammet Deveci Site selection for hydrogen underground storage using interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy sets , 2018 .

[14]  Bong-Jin Gim,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen storage systems for automobiles in Korea using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2014 .

[15]  Fernando Silva Parreiras,et al.  A review on multi-criteria decision-making for energy efficiency in automotive engineering , 2020, Applied Computing and Informatics.

[16]  Çağlar Conker,et al.  A novel fuzzy logic based safe operation oriented control technique for driving HHO dry cell systems based on PWM duty cycle , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[17]  Abhishekh,et al.  TOPSIS for Multi Criteria Decision Making in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment , 2016 .

[18]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for fault-tree analysis on printed circuit board assembly , 2006, Microelectron. Reliab..

[19]  Liang-Hsuan Chen,et al.  Considering the decision maker's attitudinal character to solve multi-criteria decision-making problems in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[20]  Henrietta W. Langmi,et al.  South African hydrogen infrastructure (HySA infrastructure) for fuel cells and energy storage: Overview of a projects portfolio , 2017 .

[21]  Rakesh Kumar Bajaj,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Making with Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Number based on Distance Measure & Parametric Entropy Approach , 2018 .

[22]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Selection of sustainable urban transportation alternatives using an integrated intuitionistic fuzzy Choquet integral approach , 2018 .

[23]  V. Torra,et al.  A framework for linguistic logic programming , 2010 .

[24]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Fuzzy Multi-actor Multi-criteria Decision Making for sustainability assessment of biomass-based technologies for hydrogen production , 2013 .

[25]  Lincoln Paterson,et al.  Physical, chemical and energy aspects of underground hydrogen storage , 1979 .

[26]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[27]  Shu-Ping Wan,et al.  Extended VIKOR method for multiple criteria decision-making with linguistic hesitant fuzzy information , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[28]  W. David,et al.  Reversible ammonia-based and liquid organic hydrogen carriers for high-density hydrogen storage: Recent progress , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[29]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy sets and their application to environmental quality evaluation , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[30]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Extended hesitant fuzzy sets , 2017 .

[31]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Entropy Measures for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets Using the Concept of Interval-Transformed Hesitant Fuzzy Elements , 2018, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[32]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy entropy and cross‐entropy and their use in multiattribute decision‐making , 2012, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[33]  Francisco Chiclana,et al.  A risk attitudinal ranking method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers based on novel attitudinal expected score and accuracy functions , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[34]  İhsan Kaya,et al.  A comprehensive review of fuzzy multi criteria decision making methodologies for energy policy making , 2019, Energy Strategy Reviews.

[35]  Chia-Wei Hsu,et al.  Site selection for carbon dioxide geological storage using analytic network process , 2012 .

[36]  Ahmad Mousaei,et al.  A Decision Support System (DSS) to Select the Premier Fuel to Develop in the Value Chain of Natural Gas , 2015 .

[37]  Fan Zhang,et al.  The survey of key technologies in hydrogen energy storage , 2016 .

[38]  R. Rakkiyappan,et al.  Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy entropy based VIKOR method for industrial robots selection , 2019, Expert Syst. Appl..

[39]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Multiplicative Consistency of hesitant fuzzy Preference Relation and its Application in Group Decision Making , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[40]  A. Sauhats,et al.  Optimal investment and operational planning of a storage power plant , 2016 .

[41]  Yasunori Kikuchi,et al.  A region-specific analysis of technology implementation of hydrogen energy in Japan , 2017, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[42]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Sets: State of the Art and Future Directions , 2014, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[43]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[44]  İbrahim Zeki Akyurt,et al.  Hydrogen mobility roll-up site selection using intuitionistic fuzzy sets based WASPAS, COPRAS and EDAS , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.