ACCF and AHA Presidents' Letter on MEDCAC.

[1]  F. Prinzen,et al.  Baseline left ventricular dP/dtmax rather than the acute improvement in dP/dtmax predicts clinical outcome in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2011, European journal of heart failure.

[2]  M. Ginks,et al.  Invasive acute hemodynamic response to guide left ventricular lead implantation predicts chronic remodeling in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Gary Friday,et al.  2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guideline , 2011, Circulation.

[4]  J. Halperin,et al.  2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guideline , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  Nicolas Derval,et al.  Optimizing hemodynamics in heart failure patients by systematic screening of left ventricular pacing sites: the lateral left ventricular wall and the coronary sinus are rarely the best sites. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Optimal left ventricular lead position predicts reverse remodeling and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.