An evaluation of interactive tabletops in elementary mathematics education

[1]  Gary J. Duhon,et al.  Evaluating the generalization of math fact fluency gains across paper and computer performance modalities. , 2012, Journal of school psychology.

[2]  Matej Zajc,et al.  An interactive tangible user interface application for learning addition concepts , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[3]  Emma Mercier,et al.  Multi-touch tables and the relationship with collaborative classroom pedagogies: A synthetic review , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[4]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Interactive tabletops in education , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[5]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Beyond one-size-fits-all: how interactive tabletops support collaborative learning , 2011, IDC.

[6]  Yuhyung Shin,et al.  Role of face‐to‐face and computer‐mediated communication time in the cohesion and performance of mixed‐mode groups , 2011 .

[7]  David McNeill,et al.  A multimodal approach to coding discourse: Collaboration, distributed cognition, and geometric reasoning , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[8]  Ned Kock,et al.  Media Naturalness Reduction and Compensatory Channel Expansion: A Study of Online and Face-to-Face Sections of the Same Course , 2011, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[9]  S. Lubienski,et al.  The Development of Gender Achievement Gaps in Mathematics and Reading During Elementary and Middle School , 2011 .

[10]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Comparing the effects of representational tools in collaborative and individual inquiry learning , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[11]  Helen W. Kang,et al.  Computer-generated geometry instruction: a preliminary study , 2011 .

[12]  Egbert G. Harskamp,et al.  Exploring gender and gender pairing in the knowledge elaboration processes of students using computer-supported collaborative learning , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[13]  A. A. Mohammed,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction on enhancing the classification skill in second- graders at risk for learning disabilities , 2010 .

[14]  M. Linn,et al.  New trends in gender and mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  S. McComb,et al.  Team Decision Making in Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: How Initial Computer-Mediated or Face-to-Face Meetings Set the Stage for Later Outcomes , 2010, Decis. Sci..

[16]  K. Bui,et al.  Gender Similarities in Math Performance from Middle School through High School. , 2010 .

[17]  Katia Passerini,et al.  Computer-supported team-based learning: The impact of motivation, enjoyment and team contributions on learning outcomes , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Amanda B. Diekman,et al.  Seeking Congruity Between Goals and Roles , 2010, Psychological science.

[19]  Rose Tirotta,et al.  Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students' self-reported motivation in mathematics , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Diane Pedrotty Bryant,et al.  Analysis of studies of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance of students with learning disabilities , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Equal Opportunities: Do Shareable Interfaces Promote More Group Participation Than Single User Displays? , 2009, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  Esmeralda Matute,et al.  Gender Differences and Cognitive Correlates of Mathematical Skills in School-Aged Children , 2009, Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence.

[23]  Mark Wilson,et al.  Gender Differences in Large-Scale Math Assessments: PISA Trend 2000 and 2003 , 2009 .

[24]  Kurt Kraiger,et al.  Transforming Our Models of Learning and Development: Web-Based Instruction as Enabler of Third-Generation Instruction , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[25]  Daniel O. Beltran,et al.  Are Computers Good for Children? The Effects of Home Computers on Educational Outcomes , 2008 .

[26]  Anne N. Rinn,et al.  Gender Differences in Gifted Adolescents' Math/Verbal Self-Concepts and Math/Verbal Achievement: Implications for the STEM Fields , 2008 .

[27]  Barry D. Davidson,et al.  Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[28]  R. Bosker,et al.  Exploring cross-national differences in gender gaps in education , 2006 .

[29]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Marilyn E. Strutchens,et al.  A Closer Look at Gender in NAEP Mathematics Achievement and Affect Data: Intersections with Achievement, Race/Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status. , 2006 .

[31]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Development and evaluation of multimedia whiteboard system for improving mathematical problem solving , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  David F. Cihak,et al.  Using Computer-Assisted Instruction and the Nonverbal Reading Approach to Teach Word Identification , 2005 .

[34]  Gail Crombie,et al.  Predictors of Young Adolescents’ Math Grades and Course Enrollment Intentions: Gender Similarities and Differences , 2005 .

[35]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[36]  E. Salas,et al.  An Integrated Model of Training Evaluation and Effectiveness , 2004 .

[37]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Powering E-Learning In the New Millennium: An Overview of E-Learning and Enabling Technology , 2003, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[39]  Olivera Marjanovic,et al.  Learning and teaching in a synchronous collaborative environment , 1999, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[40]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[41]  J. Hyde.  How large are cognitive gender differences? A meta-analysis using !w² and d.. , 1981 .

[42]  J. Lever,et al.  Sex Differences in the Complexity of Children's Play and Games. , 1978 .

[43]  Nina L. Colwill,et al.  The psychology of sex differences , 1978 .

[44]  H. Philp.  MEASUREMENT AND ASSESSMENT , 1958 .

[45]  Sarah M. Kiefer,et al.  Relationships Among Adolescents' Perceptions of Friends' Behaviors, Academic Self-Concept, and Math Performance , 2012 .

[46]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Using an Intelligent Tutor and Math Fluency Training to Improve Math Performance , 2011, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[47]  A. Segal,et al.  Do Gestural Interfaces Promote Thinking? Embodied Interaction: Congruent Gestures and Direct Touch Promote Performance in Math , 2011 .

[48]  Fleur Ruth Prinsen,et al.  Effects on participation of an experimental CSCL-programme to support elaboration: Do all students benefit? , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[49]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Gender and Occupational Outcomes. Longitudinal Assessments of Individual, Social, and Cultural Influences , 2008 .

[50]  Chrystalla Mouza,et al.  A Framework for Addressing Challenges to Classroom Technology Use , 2008 .

[51]  H. Watt,et al.  What motivates females and males to pursue sex-stereotyped careers? , 2008 .

[52]  Derek Glover,et al.  MOTIVATION : THE CONTRIBUTION OF INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARDS TO TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MATHEMATICS , 2005 .

[53]  Carol K. K. Chan,et al.  Learning, assessment and collaboration in computer-supported environments , 2004 .

[54]  Karen Swan,et al.  LEARNING ONLINE: A REVIEW OF CURRENT RESEARCH ON ISSUES OF INTERFACE, TEACHING PRESENCE AND LEARNER CHARACTERISTICS , 2004 .

[55]  G. DuPaul,et al.  Task Engagement and Mathematics Performance in Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Effects of Supplemental Computer Instruction. , 2002 .

[56]  Claire O'Malley,et al.  Computer Supported Collaborative Learning , 1995, NATO ASI Series.