MCBioCH4: A computational model for biogas and biomethane evaluation

Abstract The production and use of biogas and biomethane by anaerobic digestion is part of the critically needed energy transition, and it is achieving a growing interest in Europe. The planning and design of biogas/biomethane solutions necessitates the support of modelling tools for the calculation and evaluation of mass, energy and emission flows originated by different process and technological configurations. In the present study, a model for the preliminary evaluation of biogas and biomethane systems is presented. The model (named MCBioCH4) focuses on triple targets: i) obtaining information about the productivity of biogas/biomethane plants regarding achievable gas flow rates; ii) determining the plant energy expenditures and subsequently the economically exploitable energy flow shares; and iii) assessing the entire environmental impact of the system. The design of MCBioCH4 was specifically addressed to dual objectives: i) provide support to the preliminary assessment and comparison of different potential plant configurations and technological solutions, and ii) assist users in the complete definition of mass, energy and environmental flows, through the implementation of default datasets and assisted data input. The model is a standalone application fully equipped with graphical user interfaces. A set of default parameters was implemented in MCBioCH4, based on a detailed literature review. Alternatively, customized input parameters may be introduced by the user. If biogas scenarios are selected, the model simulates a combustion in a cogeneration unit. If biomethane scenarios are selected, the user is allowed to define the type and features of the upgrading technology. Two different options are implemented for biomethane: injection to the natural gas distribution grid, or use as a transportation fuel. The emission of carbon dioxide equivalent associated to each phase of the process is estimated by the model, based on a cradle-to-grave approach. Default emission factors are available, but these can be customized by the user. MCBioCH4 was tested on a case study in Italy. It provides a valuable support to project developers and administrations in defining the most economically and environmentally sustainable plant configurations.

[1]  Martina Poeschl,et al.  Environmental impacts of biogas deployment – Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways , 2012 .

[2]  P. Kaparaju,et al.  Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by adopting anaerobic digestion technology on dairy, sow and pig farms in Finland , 2011 .

[3]  O. Hijazi,et al.  Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe , 2016 .

[4]  Bogomir Muršec,et al.  Biogas production from maize hybrids. , 2010 .

[5]  Adenise Lorenci Woiciechowski,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment of Biofuels , 2016 .

[6]  May-Britt Hägg,et al.  Techno-economic evaluation of biogas upgrading process using CO2 facilitated transport membrane , 2010 .

[7]  Richard M. Dinsdale,et al.  An evaluation of the policy and techno-economic factors affecting the potential for biogas upgrading for transport fuel use in the UK , 2011 .

[8]  J. I. Eze,et al.  Maximizing the potentials of biogas through upgrading , 2010 .

[9]  Carlos Peregrina,et al.  Techno-economic and Life Cycle Assessment of methane production via biogas upgrading and power to gas technology , 2017 .

[10]  F. Graf,et al.  Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review , 2016 .

[11]  Shane Ward,et al.  Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways , 2010 .

[12]  Vincent G. Gomes,et al.  Pressure swing adsorption for carbon dioxide sequestration from exhaust gases , 2002 .

[13]  Fredric Bauer,et al.  Biogas upgrading - Review of commercial technologies , 2013 .

[14]  Ole Jørgen Hanssen,et al.  The BioValueChain model: a Norwegian model for calculating environmental impacts of biogas value chains , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[15]  Guftaar Ahmad Sardar Sidhu,et al.  A comparative review of China, India and Pakistan renewable energy sectors and sharing opportunities , 2016 .

[16]  N. Scarlat,et al.  Renewable energy policy framework and bioenergy contribution in the European Union – An overview from National Renewable Energy Action Plans and Progress Reports , 2015 .

[17]  Grazia Leonzio,et al.  Upgrading of biogas to bio-methane with chemical absorption process: simulation and environmental impact , 2016 .

[18]  Miroslaw L. Wyszynski,et al.  Biogas upgrade to syn-gas (H 2CO) via dry and oxidative reforming , 2011 .

[19]  Yajing Xu,et al.  Biogas upgrading technologies: Energetic analysis and environmental impact assessment , 2015 .

[20]  David Jeison,et al.  A review on the state-of-the-art of physical/chemical and biological technologies for biogas upgrading , 2015, Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology.

[21]  I. Youm,et al.  Cereal crops for biogas production: A review of possible impact of elevated CO2 , 2017 .

[22]  Cinzia Buratti,et al.  Assessment of GHG emissions of biomethane from energy cereal crops in Umbria, Italy , 2013 .

[23]  J. Bacenetti,et al.  Environmental assessment of two different crop systems in terms of biomethane potential production. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  Cristina Cantale,et al.  Triticale for Bioenergy Production , 2016 .

[25]  Siwa Msangi,et al.  Global Scenarios for Biofuels: Impacts and Implications , 2008 .

[26]  Muyiwa S. Adaramola,et al.  A Review of Commercial Biogas Systems and Lessons for Africa , 2018, Energies.

[27]  Rosaria Augelletti,et al.  Pressure swing adsorption for biogas upgrading. A new process configuration for the separation of biomethane and carbon dioxide , 2017 .

[28]  Martin Miltner,et al.  Membrane biogas upgrading processes for the production of natural gas substitute , 2010 .

[29]  Giuseppe Genon,et al.  Global and local emissions of a biogas plant considering the production of biomethane as an alternative end-use solution. , 2015 .

[30]  V. Tyagi,et al.  Anaerobic co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW): Progress and challenges , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[31]  P Mostbauer,et al.  Climate balance of biogas upgrading systems. , 2010, Waste management.

[32]  Nicolae Scarlat,et al.  Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe , 2018, Renewable Energy.

[33]  Niamh M. Power,et al.  Which is the preferable transport fuel on a greenhouse gas basis; biomethane or ethanol? , 2009 .

[34]  Biagio Pecorino,et al.  Biogasdoneright™: An innovative new system is commercialized in Italy , 2016 .

[35]  Soon Woong Chang,et al.  Perspective on anaerobic digestion for biomethanation in cold environments , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[36]  Ian M. O'Hara,et al.  Environmental and economic life cycle assessment of energy recovery from sewage sludge through different anaerobic digestion pathways , 2017 .

[37]  Carlos A. Grande,et al.  Upgrade of Methane from Landfill Gas by Pressure Swing Adsorption , 2005 .

[38]  Elena Magaril,et al.  PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION OF ENERGY AND CLIMATE ADAPTATION: GLOBAL TASKS AND LOCAL ROUTES , 2017 .

[39]  J. Bekkering,et al.  Optimisation of a green gas supply chain--a review. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[40]  Devon E. Worth,et al.  Fugitive methane emissions from an agricultural biodigester , 2011 .

[41]  Mikael Lantz,et al.  Environmental performance of biogas produced from industrial residues including competition with animal feed – life-cycle calculations according to different methodologies and standards , 2013 .

[42]  Ingunn Saur Modahl,et al.  Relation between greenhouse gas emissions and economic profit for different configurations of biogas value chains: A case study on different levels of sector integration , 2018 .

[43]  Giacobbe Braccio,et al.  Biogas upgrading via membrane process: Modelling of pilot plant scale and the end uses for the grid injection , 2013 .

[44]  Xavier Gabarrell,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biogas upgrading technologies. , 2012, Waste management.

[45]  Qie Sun,et al.  Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation , 2015 .

[46]  Haslenda Hashim,et al.  Biogas as a renewable energy fuel – A review of biogas upgrading, utilisation and storage , 2017 .

[47]  Xavier Gabarrell,et al.  Potential CO2 savings through biomethane generation from municipal waste biogas , 2014 .

[48]  Deborah Panepinto,et al.  Production of green energy from co-digestion: perspectives for the Province of Cuneo, energetic balance and environmental sustainability , 2013, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[49]  Victor M Zavala,et al.  Economic and Environmental Analysis for Advancing Sustainable Management of Livestock Waste: A Wisconsin Case Study. , 2018, ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering.

[50]  Hanping Mao,et al.  A techno-economic evaluation of anaerobic biogas producing systems in developing countries. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[51]  M. Segreto,et al.  Environmental impact of biogas: A short review of current knowledge , 2018, Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering.

[52]  Gaetano Chinnici,et al.  Assessment of the potential energy supply and biomethane from the anaerobic digestion of agro-food feedstocks in Sicily , 2018 .

[53]  Črtomir Rozman,et al.  A Multi-Criteria Assessment of Energy Crops for Biogas Production , 2010 .