Learning Goals in an Exemplary Science Teacher's Practice: Cognitive and Social Factors in Teaching for Conceptual Change.

The conversations of elementary school students in the classroom of Sister M. Gertrude Hennessey have captured the attention of science educators, scientists, and cognitive psychologists. Research studies documenting student outcomes have been presented in professional journals and at professional meetings. While there are many unique aspects of learning that the students in this classroom exhibit during conversations with one another and their teacher, the extraordinary performance of these students inevitably raises the question: How does Sister Gertrude do it? What are significant components of her instruction that support the student outcomes reported in studies of her students? In this article, we provide a detailed account of her instruction, an account that can help us understand how she facilitates conceptual change learning through a carefully chosen set of learning goals. Through instruction that established these learning goals, Sister facilitated a learning environment in which students spoke about their ideas, offered justifications for ideas, recognized the limitations of an idea, and negotiated knowledge claims in ways similar to some of those in the scientific community. In presenting this case study, we are conscious of the implications that answers to our questions about Sister Gertrude's instruction could have for other teachers as well. In other words, we are interested in whether the learning that takes place in Sister's classroom is the product of a unique and singular environment, or whether the instructional principles she uses, once incorporated into the practices of other teachers, might result in similar student outcomes. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Sci Ed83:738–760, 1999.

[1]  P. Scott,et al.  Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the Classroom , 1994 .

[2]  Peter J. Fensham,et al.  The importance of reflection in improving science teaching and learning , 1991 .

[3]  J. Baird,et al.  Improving learning through enhanced metacognition: a classroom study , 1986 .

[4]  M. Beeth Teaching for Conceptual Change: Using Status as a Metacognitive Tool. , 1998 .

[5]  D. Kuhn,et al.  The development of scientific thinking skills , 1988 .

[6]  Mariana G. Hewson,et al.  The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction , 1984 .

[7]  P. Hewson,et al.  The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom , 1989 .

[8]  Jim Garrison,et al.  Realism, Deweyan Pragmatism, and Educational Research , 1994 .

[9]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[10]  Richard T. White,et al.  Metalearning and conceptual change , 1989 .

[11]  Michael E. Beeth Teaching Science in Fifth Grade: Instructional Goals That Support Conceptual Change. , 1998 .

[12]  M. Beeth Facilitating Conceptual Change Learning: The Need for Teachers to Support Metacognition , 1998 .

[13]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[14]  R. Osborne,et al.  Learning science: A generative process , 1983 .

[15]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[16]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[17]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[18]  Peter W. Hewson,et al.  An appropriate conception of teaching science: A view from studies of science learning , 1988 .

[19]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change , 1993 .

[20]  Peter W. Hewson,et al.  A Conceptual Change Approach to Learning Science , 1981 .