Tools for measuring, modelling, and valuing ecosystem services

Increasing interest in measuring, modelling and valuing ecosystem services (ES), the benefits that ecosystems provide to people, has resulted in the development of an array of ES assessment tools in recent years. Selecting an appropriate tool for measuring and modelling ES can be challenging. This document provides guidance for practitioners on existing tools that can be applied to measure or model ES provided by important sites for biodiversity and nature conservation, including Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs), natural World Heritage sites (WHS), and protected areas (PAs). Selecting an appropriate tool requires identifying the specific question being addressed, what sorts of results or outputs are required, and consideration of practical factors such as the level of expertise, time and data required for applying any given tool. This guide builds on existing reviews of ES assessment tools, but has an explicit focus on assessing ES for sites of importance for biodiversity and nature conservation.

[1]  Perrine Hamel,et al.  Assessing ecosystem service provision under climate change to support conservation and development planning in Myanmar , 2017, PloS one.

[2]  N. Dudley,et al.  Arguments for Protected Areas: Multiple Benefits for Conservation and Use , 2010 .

[3]  D. Semmens,et al.  A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services , 2011 .

[4]  Gary W. Johnson,et al.  ARIES (ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services ): a new tool for ecosystem services assessment, planning, and valuation. , 2009 .

[5]  Simon Willcock,et al.  Do ecosystem service maps and models meet stakeholders’ needs? A preliminary survey across sub-Saharan Africa , 2016 .

[6]  Daniel Juhn,et al.  Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Service Co-Benefits of Biodiversity Priority Areas in Madagascar , 2016, PloS one.

[7]  Mark Mulligan,et al.  WaterWorld: a self-parameterising, physically-based model for application in data-poor but problem-rich environments globally , 2013 .

[8]  Gary W. Johnson,et al.  A Methodology for Adaptable and Robust Ecosystem Services Assessment , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  Ioannis N. Athanasiadis,et al.  Machine learning for ecosystem services , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[10]  N. Kingston,et al.  Protected Planet Report 2014 , 2014 .

[11]  C. Kormos,et al.  IUCN World Heritage Outlook 2: A conservation assessment of all natural World Heritage sites , 2017 .

[12]  Li Yan-fe,et al.  Retrospection on the "Integrity" Principle of World Heritage——Review of the 4 Concepts of the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention , 2009 .